全通道有效磁流变阻尼器的性能测试与滞回模型
|
摘要
传统剪切阀式磁流变阻尼器在活塞上缠绕励磁线圈,导致1/2以上长度阻尼通道无效,影响阻尼器的最大出力。为了克服上述缺陷,在前期概念设计和理论分析的基础上,制作了2个全通道有效的磁流变阻尼器模型,测试了其在不同电流输入状态下阻尼通道处的磁场分布以及力-位移、力-速度等力学性能曲线,并通过对改进型Sigmoid模型的参数识别建立了模型阻尼器的动力滞回模型。研究表明,模型阻尼器阻尼通道处的磁场分布与有限元分析结果基本符合,其磁路结构可较好地实现全通道有效;全通道有效磁流变阻尼器的最大阻尼力比传统剪切阀式磁流变阻尼器的最大阻尼力提高一倍以上,阻尼力调节系数提高70%以上;改进型Sigmoid模型结构形式简单,识别精度高,可作为全通道有效磁流变阻尼器的动力滞回模型。
Because of the coil enwinded on the piston,half length of the damping path can't perform as effective length,which decreases the maximum damping force of the MR damper.In order to overcome this disadvantage,2 MR dampers with full-length effective damping path are fabricated and tested based on the preliminary work includes conceptual design and theoretical analysis.The magnetic flux densities of the damping path,the force-displacement curves of the damper and the force-velocity curves of the damper in states with different current inputs are obtained.The mechanical model of the MR damper with full-length effective damping path is built by parameter identification of improved Sigmoid model.The experiment results show that the new-style magnetic circuit can realize the full-length effective theory,and the magnetic flux densities of the damping path in states are consistent with magnetic finite element analysis results.Compared to the traditional shear-valve mode MR damper of the same size,the maximum output powers of the MR damper with full-length effective damping path are 100% increased at least,and the adjustable range of the output powers is 70% increased at least.The improved Sigmoid model is both simply and precise and can perform as the mechanical model of the MR dampers with full-length damping path effectively.
Because of the coil enwinded on the piston,half length of the damping path can't perform as effective length,which decreases the maximum damping force of the MR damper.In order to overcome this disadvantage,2 MR dampers with full-length effective damping path are fabricated and tested based on the preliminary work includes conceptual design and theoretical analysis.The magnetic flux densities of the damping path,the force-displacement curves of the damper and the force-velocity curves of the damper in states with different current inputs are obtained.The mechanical model of the MR damper with full-length effective damping path is built by parameter identification of improved Sigmoid model.The experiment results show that the new-style magnetic circuit can realize the full-length effective theory,and the magnetic flux densities of the damping path in states are consistent with magnetic finite element analysis results.Compared to the traditional shear-valve mode MR damper of the same size,the maximum output powers of the MR damper with full-length effective damping path are 100% increased at least,and the adjustable range of the output powers is 70% increased at least.The improved Sigmoid model is both simply and precise and can perform as the mechanical model of the MR dampers with full-length damping path effectively.
引文
[1]Yang G,Spencer B F,Carlson J D,et al.Large-scaleMR fluid dampers:modeling,and dynamic perfor-mance considerations[J].Engineering Structures,2002,24(3):309—323.
[2]Yang G.Large-scale magnetorheological fluid damperfor vibration mitigation:modeling,testing and control[D].Indiana:University of Notre Dame,2001.
[3]Dyke S J,Spencer B F,SainM K,et al.An experi-mental study of magnetorheological dampers for seis-mic protection[J].Smart Mater.Struct.,1998,7:693—703.
[4]欧进萍,关新春.磁流变耗能器及其性能[J].地震工程与工程振动,1998,18(3):74—81.
[5]欧进萍.结构振动控制—主动、半主动和智能控制[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.
[6]瞿伟廉,樊友川.磁流变液阻尼器的磁路有限元分析与优化设计方法[J].华中科技大学学报,2006,23(3):1—4.
[7]李忠献,吴林林,徐龙河,等.磁流变阻尼器的构造设计及其阻尼力性能的试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2003,23(1):128—132.
[8]丁阳,张路,李忠献.等.两种全通道有效磁流变阻尼器的设计与性能分析[J].振动工程学报,2008,21(6):565—570.
[9]Wereley N M,Pang L,Kamath G M.Idealized hys-teresis modeling of electrorheological and magnetorhe-ological dampers[J].Journal of Intelligent MaterialSystems and Structures,1998,9(8):642—649.
[10]Spencer B F,Dyke S J,Sain M K,et al.Phenomeno-logical model for magnetorheological damper[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics,ASCE,1997,123(3):230—238.
[11]Li Z X,Xu L H.Performance tests and hysteresisModel of MRF-04K Damper[J].Journal of StructuralEngineering,ASCE,2005,131(8):1 303—1 306.
[12]关新春,欧进萍.磁流变耗能器的阻尼力模型及其参数确定[J].振动与冲击,2001,20(1):5—8.
[13]周强,瞿伟廉.磁流变液阻尼器的两种力学模型和试验验证[J].地震工程与工程振动,2002,22(4):144—150.
[14]姜南,李忠献.相邻结构地震反映MR阻尼器控制的仿真分析[J].地震工程与工程振动,2008,28(2):131—136.
[2]Yang G.Large-scale magnetorheological fluid damperfor vibration mitigation:modeling,testing and control[D].Indiana:University of Notre Dame,2001.
[3]Dyke S J,Spencer B F,SainM K,et al.An experi-mental study of magnetorheological dampers for seis-mic protection[J].Smart Mater.Struct.,1998,7:693—703.
[4]欧进萍,关新春.磁流变耗能器及其性能[J].地震工程与工程振动,1998,18(3):74—81.
[5]欧进萍.结构振动控制—主动、半主动和智能控制[M].北京:科学出版社,2003.
[6]瞿伟廉,樊友川.磁流变液阻尼器的磁路有限元分析与优化设计方法[J].华中科技大学学报,2006,23(3):1—4.
[7]李忠献,吴林林,徐龙河,等.磁流变阻尼器的构造设计及其阻尼力性能的试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2003,23(1):128—132.
[8]丁阳,张路,李忠献.等.两种全通道有效磁流变阻尼器的设计与性能分析[J].振动工程学报,2008,21(6):565—570.
[9]Wereley N M,Pang L,Kamath G M.Idealized hys-teresis modeling of electrorheological and magnetorhe-ological dampers[J].Journal of Intelligent MaterialSystems and Structures,1998,9(8):642—649.
[10]Spencer B F,Dyke S J,Sain M K,et al.Phenomeno-logical model for magnetorheological damper[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics,ASCE,1997,123(3):230—238.
[11]Li Z X,Xu L H.Performance tests and hysteresisModel of MRF-04K Damper[J].Journal of StructuralEngineering,ASCE,2005,131(8):1 303—1 306.
[12]关新春,欧进萍.磁流变耗能器的阻尼力模型及其参数确定[J].振动与冲击,2001,20(1):5—8.
[13]周强,瞿伟廉.磁流变液阻尼器的两种力学模型和试验验证[J].地震工程与工程振动,2002,22(4):144—150.
[14]姜南,李忠献.相邻结构地震反映MR阻尼器控制的仿真分析[J].地震工程与工程振动,2008,28(2):131—136.
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心