钢筋混凝土大比例模型框架角柱突然失效模拟试验研究
|
摘要
结构在偶然荷载作用下的连续性倒塌是严重危害公共安全的问题。对经过抗震设计的3跨3层钢筋混凝土二分之一比例钢筋混凝土框架模型进行角柱突然卸载试验,研究结构的动力反应、失效机理及荷载传递路径的改变。框架系按美国和中国的抗震设计规范设计。在试验中用素混凝土块替代需拆除的柱,并以氢气炮冲击作用拆除角柱。框架角柱失效后,原框架柱所承受的作用力通过框架梁和楼板传递到四周的柱,在拆除第一根柱和第二根柱后角柱位置的位移分别为6.3 mm和20.6 mm,整体结构未发生倒塌破坏。研究结果表明经过抗震设计的框架结构具有良好的抗倒塌性能。采用有限元分析软件Sap2000对试验模型进行了分析,其结果与试验吻合较好。
The progressive collapse of structures under accidental actions is a serious threat to the public safety.This paper reports the dynamic response,failure mechanism and load-transmitting route change of a 3-bay and 3-story half-scale reinforced concrete frame model subjected to sudden corner column removal.The frame was designed according to the US and Chinese seismic design codes.In the experiment,the column to be removed was replaced by concrete blocks which were blasted out by a hydrogen gas-gun.After the failure of the column,the force that was withstood by the columns were transferred to the surrounding columns,and the displacements at the removed column nodes were 6.3mm and 20.6mm respectively following the removal of the first corner column and the column next to the corner.The structure did not collapse during the experiment,which showed good resistance to total collapse due to the proper seismic design.In addition,simulations of the experiment were conducted using software Sap2000,and the analysis results are in good agreement with the experimental results.
The progressive collapse of structures under accidental actions is a serious threat to the public safety.This paper reports the dynamic response,failure mechanism and load-transmitting route change of a 3-bay and 3-story half-scale reinforced concrete frame model subjected to sudden corner column removal.The frame was designed according to the US and Chinese seismic design codes.In the experiment,the column to be removed was replaced by concrete blocks which were blasted out by a hydrogen gas-gun.After the failure of the column,the force that was withstood by the columns were transferred to the surrounding columns,and the displacements at the removed column nodes were 6.3mm and 20.6mm respectively following the removal of the first corner column and the column next to the corner.The structure did not collapse during the experiment,which showed good resistance to total collapse due to the proper seismic design.In addition,simulations of the experiment were conducted using software Sap2000,and the analysis results are in good agreement with the experimental results.
引文
[1]Ellingwood B R.Mitigating risk from abnormal loads and progressive collapse[J].Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities,2006,20(4):315-323.
[2]Sucuoglu,Haluk,Citipitioqlu,et al.Resistance mechanisms in RC building frames subjected to column failure[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,1994,120(3):765-782.
[3]Marjanishvili S,Agnew E.Comparison of various procedure for progressive collapse analysis[J].Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities,2006,20(4):365-374.
[4]Sasani M,Bazan M,Sagiroglu S.Experimental and analytical progressive collapse evaluation of actual reinforced concrete structure[J].Structural Journal,2007,104(6):731-739.
[5]易伟建,何庆锋,肖岩.钢筋混凝土框架结构抗倒塌性能的试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2007,28(5):104-109.YI Weijian,HE Qingfeng,XIAO Yan.Collapse performance of RC frame structure[J].Journal of Building Structures,2007,28(5):104-109.(in Chinese)
[6]施炜,叶列平,陆新征,等.不同抗震设防RC框架结构抗倒塌能力的研究[J].工程力学,2011,28(3):41-48.SHI Wei,YE Lieping,LU Xinzheng,et al.Study on the collapse-resistant capacity of RC frames with different seismic fortification levels[J].Engineering Mechanics,2011,28(3):41-48.(in Chinese)
[7]李荣涛.混凝土结构火灾爆裂危险性评估研究[J].自然灾害学报,2012,21(1):204-210.LI Rongtao.Research on fire spalling risk assessment of concrete structures[J].Journal of Natural Disasters,2012,21(1):204-210.(in Chinese)
[8]刘培玄,周正华,赵纪生,等.汶川地震典型民居震害特征分析[J].自然灾害学报,2012,21(2):89-94.LIU Peixuan,ZHOU Zhenghua,ZHAO Jisheng,et al.Seismic damage characteristic analysis of typical private residence building in Wenchuan earthquake[J].Journal of Natural Disasters,2012,21(2):89-94.(in Chinese)
[9]GSA2003,Progressive Collapse Analysis and Design Guidelines for New Federal Office Buildings and Major Modernization Project[S].USA:US General Service Administration,2003.
[2]Sucuoglu,Haluk,Citipitioqlu,et al.Resistance mechanisms in RC building frames subjected to column failure[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,1994,120(3):765-782.
[3]Marjanishvili S,Agnew E.Comparison of various procedure for progressive collapse analysis[J].Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities,2006,20(4):365-374.
[4]Sasani M,Bazan M,Sagiroglu S.Experimental and analytical progressive collapse evaluation of actual reinforced concrete structure[J].Structural Journal,2007,104(6):731-739.
[5]易伟建,何庆锋,肖岩.钢筋混凝土框架结构抗倒塌性能的试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2007,28(5):104-109.YI Weijian,HE Qingfeng,XIAO Yan.Collapse performance of RC frame structure[J].Journal of Building Structures,2007,28(5):104-109.(in Chinese)
[6]施炜,叶列平,陆新征,等.不同抗震设防RC框架结构抗倒塌能力的研究[J].工程力学,2011,28(3):41-48.SHI Wei,YE Lieping,LU Xinzheng,et al.Study on the collapse-resistant capacity of RC frames with different seismic fortification levels[J].Engineering Mechanics,2011,28(3):41-48.(in Chinese)
[7]李荣涛.混凝土结构火灾爆裂危险性评估研究[J].自然灾害学报,2012,21(1):204-210.LI Rongtao.Research on fire spalling risk assessment of concrete structures[J].Journal of Natural Disasters,2012,21(1):204-210.(in Chinese)
[8]刘培玄,周正华,赵纪生,等.汶川地震典型民居震害特征分析[J].自然灾害学报,2012,21(2):89-94.LIU Peixuan,ZHOU Zhenghua,ZHAO Jisheng,et al.Seismic damage characteristic analysis of typical private residence building in Wenchuan earthquake[J].Journal of Natural Disasters,2012,21(2):89-94.(in Chinese)
[9]GSA2003,Progressive Collapse Analysis and Design Guidelines for New Federal Office Buildings and Major Modernization Project[S].USA:US General Service Administration,2003.
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心