复合土钉墙支护结构的静力和动力响应分析

英文篇名：Analysis of Static and Dynamic Response of Composite Soil Nailed Wall Supporting Structure
中文刊名：路基工程
英文刊名：Subgrade Engineering
作者：张森 ; 言志信 ; 张学东
英文作者：ZHANG Sen ; YAN Zhi-xin ; ZHANG Xue-dong (1.School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics ; Lanzhou University ; Lanzhou 730000 ; China ; 2.Key Laboratory of Western Disaster and Environmental Mechanics of Ministry of Education ; Lanzhou 730000 ; China)
中文关键词：复合土钉墙 ; 支护 ; 预应力锚杆 ; 地震 ; 数值模拟
英文关键词：composite soil nailed wall ; support ; prestressed rock bolt ; earthquake ; numerical simulation
出版日期：2011-02-20
机构：兰州大学土木工程与力学学院;西部灾害与环境力学教育部重点实验室;
年：2011
期：01
出版单位：路基工程

摘要

针对国内用FLAC对基坑复合土钉墙支护结构动力响应分析的空白,通过预应力锚杆复合土钉支护的试验基坑以土钉和锚杆的轴力为研究对象,在静力和动力两种工况下进行模拟。结果表明:两种工况下,土钉轴力沿长度方向为两端小、中间大,基本呈枣核形;土钉因所处位置不同发挥的作用有差异,但在动载荷作用下基本都呈增加趋势;预应力锚杆的最大轴力在自由段且相同,地震作用对锚固段轴力影响较大,其最大变化达81.4%;通过支护结构轴力分析,提出了布设预应力锚杆的合理位置。
For the dynamic response of composite soil nailed wall supporting structure has not been analyzed using FLAC in China,the test foundation pit supported by prestressed rock bolt and soil nailing is simulated by studying the axial force of soil nailing and rock bolt under static and dynamic condition.It is indicated that under both conditions,the axial force of soil nailing is weak in ends and strong in the middle along length,basically shaped as a date pit.The action of soil nailing is different in different positions,but it trends to increase under dynamic load.The maximum axial force of prestressed rock bolt is at free section,where it keeps the same.The axial force in anchorage section is largely affected by earthquake,with the maximum changes reaching 81.4 %.Through axial force analysis of supporting structure,the reasonable position of prestressed rock bolt is advanced.

引文

[1]汤连生,宋明健,廖化荣,吴忠诚,徐通.预应力锚索复合土钉支护内力及变形分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2008(2):410-417.
    [2]肖进,许强.土钉桩和土钉挡墙对深基坑的联合支护[J].路基工程,2007(3):114-116.
    [3]周勇,朱彦鹏.土钉-预应力锚杆复合支护在深基坑的应用[J].路基工程,2008(6):32-33.
    [4]孙铁成,张明聚,杨茜.深基坑复合土钉支护模型试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(15):2585-2592.
    [5]熊文林,何则干,陈胜宏.边坡加固中预应力锚索方向角的优化设计[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,4(13):2260-2265.
    [6]范宇洁,郑七振,魏林.预应力锚索锚固体的破坏机制和极限承载能力研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(15):2765-2769.
    [7]何思明,田金昌,周建庭.胶结式预应力锚索锚固段荷载传递特性研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(1):117-121.
    [8]王光彬.土钉支护施工过程及地震作用下的有限元分析[D].兰州理工大学硕士学位论文,2006.
    [9]Itasca Consulting Group,Inc.Example Applications version 6.0,user’smanual[M].Itasca Consulting Group,Inc,2008.
    [10]吴忠诚,汤连生,廖志强,刘晓纲,颜波.深基坑复合土钉墙支护FLAC-3D模拟及大型现场原位测试研究[J].岩土工程学报,2006,28(增刊):1460-1465.
    [11]刘波,韩彦辉.FLAC原理、实例与应用指南[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2005.
    [12]王春放.土钉墙在地震作用下的动力稳定性分析[D].兰州理工大学硕士学位论文,2008.