地震作用前后极限平衡法和强度折减法的边坡稳定分析对比

英文篇名：Before and After Earthquake Actions of Slope Stability Analysis with Limiting Equilibrium Method and Strength Reduction Method
中文刊名：岩土工程技术
英文刊名：Geotechnical Engineering Technique
作者：李波 ; 汤爱平 ; 赵安平
英文作者：Li Bo ; Tang Aiping ; Zhao Anping ; College of Water Conservancy and Electric ; Heilongjiang University ; School of Civil Engineering and architecture ; Heilongjiang University
中文关键词：边坡稳定 ; 极限平衡法 ; ANSYS强度折减法 ; 拟静力法
英文关键词：slope stability ; limit equilibrium method ; ANSYS strength reduction method ; pseudo-static method
出版日期：2013-12-08
机构：黑龙江大学水利电力学院;黑龙江大学建筑工程学院;
年：2013
期：06
出版单位：岩土工程技术

摘要

分别运用极限平衡法和ANSYS强度折减法对国内某边坡地震作用前后稳定性进行了分析,考虑地震作用时采用了拟静力法施加水平和垂直两个方向的地震力。根据地震作用前后两种方法得到的边坡稳定系数、滑动面、滑动体的对比分析发现,两种方法得出的安全系数、滑动面相差不大,说明了强度折减法运用到边坡稳定分析中是合理的。强度折减法得出安全系数均比极限平衡法略大,这是由于强度折减法考虑了土体的应力-应变关系,使得计算结果更符合实际。通过地震作用前后边坡的水平位移图的对比,总结了一些规律,为地震区边坡的锚固提出相应的建议。
Respectively comparative study on limiting equilibrium method and ANSYS strength reduction method for the slope stability analysis under the earthquake action.Consider the role of the earthquake in the pseudo-static method applied vertical and horizontal directions of the earthquake force.According to before and after the earthquake action the two methods for slope stability coefficient,sliding surface and sliding body contrast analysis draw some conclusioa Two methods of safety factor and sliding surface that differs little,it is indicated that the strength reduction method applied to the slope stability analysis is reasonable.The strength reduction method that safety coefficient are slightly larger than the limit equilibrium method,this is due to the strength reduction method considering the relationship between the stress and the strain of soil,making the calculation results accord well with practice even more.Through the contrast of horizontal displacement diagram before and after the earthquake action can be found that regular,put forward the corresponding suggestions for earthquake zones of the slope anchor.

引文

[1]刘红帅,薄景山.岩土边坡地震稳定性分析研究评述[J].地震工程与工程振动,2005,20(1):164-171.
    [2]崔京浩.简明土木工程系列专辑-伟大的土木工程[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2006.
    [3]Bishop A W.The use of the slip circle in the stability analysis of slopes[J].Geotechnique,1955,15(1):62-65.
    [4]吴兆营,薄景山,刘红帅,等.岩体边坡地震稳定性动安全系数分析方法[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2004,24(3):237-241.
    [5]吴兆营,景立平,薄景山.土石坝地震稳定性分析评述[J].世界地震工程,2003,19(1):44-50.
    [6]尹紫红.地震作用下的滑坡稳定性分析[J].铁道建筑,2007(9):65-67.
    [7]陈祖煜.土质边坡稳定分析—原理·方法·程序[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2003.
    [8]刘金龙,栾茂田,赵少飞,等.关于强度折减有限元方法中边坡失稳判据的讨论.岩土力学,2005;26(8):1345-1348
    [9]李凯,李红建,陈国荣,等.有限元强度折减法的三维边坡稳定性分析[J].路基工程,2009,26(3):7-8.
    [10]李海波,肖克强,刘亚群.地震荷载作用下顺层岩质边坡安全数分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(12):2385-2394.
    [11]戴妙林,李同春.基于降强法数值计算的复杂岩质边坡动力稳定性安全评价[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(增1):2749-2754.
    [12]赵尚毅,郑颖人,张玉芳.极限分析有限元法讲座—有限元强度折减法中边坡失稳的判据探讨[J].岩土力学,2005,26(2):332-336.
    [13]赵尚毅,郑颖人,时卫民,等.有限元强度折减法求边坡稳定安全系数.岩土工程学报,2002;129(3):343-346.
    [14]徐干成,郑颖人.岩土工程中屈服准则应用的研究[J].岩土工程学报,1990,12(2):93-99.
    [15]王新敏.ANSYS工程结构数值分析[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2007.