汶川地震与玉树地震自救互救调查情况比较研究

英文篇名：Comparative studies of the status of self rescue and mutual aid in Wenchuan and Yushu earthquakes
中文刊名：国际地震动态
英文刊名：Recent Developments in World Seismology
作者：王东明 ; 李永佳 ; 陈洪富中国地震局工程力学研究所 ; 黄宝森 ; 张云昌 ; 胡卫建
英文作者：Wang Dongming1) ; Li Yongjia1) Chen Hongfu3) ; Huang Baosen2) ; Zhang Yunchang2) ; Hu Weijian2) 1) China Earthquake Disaster Prevention Center ; Beijing 100029 ; China 2) National Earthquake Response Support Service(NERSS) ; Beijing 100049 ; China 3) Institute of Engineering Mechanics ; CEA ; Harbin 150080 ; China
中文关键词：地震 ; 问卷调查 ; 自救互救 ; 应急救援 ; 对策
英文关键词：earthquake ; questionnaire ; self rescue and mutual aid ; emergency rescue ; suggestion
出版日期：2012-05-25
机构：中国地震灾害防御中心;中国地震应急搜救中心;
年：2012
期：05
出版单位：国际地震动态

摘要

通过对比汶川地震和玉树地震震后问卷调查数据,对震后灾民自救互救过程中的实际情况开展了系统的分析研究。结果表明:(1)自救互救是地震救援中受困人员获救的主要方式;(2)玉树地震参与自救互救人数比例较高,说明经过汶川地震后,公众的自救互救意识得到较明显的提高,更加主动和积极地参与到震后抢险等社会活动中;(3)在两次地震自救互救过程中,主要的困难在于缺乏救生工具和经验,并且救援工作缺乏组织管理,相互协调能力不足。基于以上调查结果,为全面提升我国地震应急救援水平和应急能力提出了一些建议和对策。
To learn the status of the residents living in the earthquake areas rescuing themselves and each other,the questionnaires were investigated after Wenchuan earthquake and Yushu earthquake.The results showed: ① The proportion of participants in self rescue and mutual aid in Yushu earthquake is higher than that in Wenchuan earthquake,indicating that the awareness of residents was increased.② The main challenges of self-and mutual-rescue in these two earthquakes were lack of tools and experience as well as deficient organization.At last,some suggestions were proposed based on these results.

引文

[1]苏幼坡,徐美珍,刘英利.自救与互救——严重地震灾害后扒救灾民方式.河北理工学院学报(社会科学版),2003,3(3):33-35
    [2]Louise K.Comfort,risk and resilience——Northridge earthquake learning following the Northridgeearthquake of January 17,1994.Contingencies and Crisis Management,1994,2(3):174-188
    [3]Kathleen Tierney.Social aspects of the Northridge earthquake.Preliminary paper#225of disaster re-search center,University of Delaware,1995:1-13
    [4]栗林荣一,蔡之瑞译.1995年1月17日日本神户地震(兵库县南部地震)调查报告.世界地震工程,1995,2:63-73
    [5]The city of Kobe,The Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake Statistics and Restoration Progress,2009:1-3
    [6]Chi-Chi Reconnaissance Team.Chi-Chi,Taiwan Earthquake Event Report.Risk Management Solutions,Inc.2000:6-7
    [7]民政部国家减灾中心,联合国开发计划署.汶川地震救援工作报告,2009:34-41
    [8]强卫.玉树不倒青海常青——关于玉树抗震救灾的形势报告(青海民族大学),2010年9月14日,ht-tp:∥www.qhnews.com/index/system/2010/09/15/010198524.shtml
    [9]中国地震应急搜救中心汶川科考组.第二专题社会公众自救互救、应急避难与救灾需求调查[报告]
    [10]中国地震应急搜救中心玉树科考组.应急救援响应实施情况和救援救灾需求调查[玉树地震科考中期进展工作报告]
    [11]徐德诗,黄建发.我国地震应急与救援发展的思考.国际地震动态,2006(10):1-8
    [12]高建国.中国地震紧急救援理论研究.华南地震,2006,26(1):118-124
    [13]邓砚,聂高众,苏桂武.地震应急的影响因素分析.灾害学,2005,20(2):27-30