湖州地震台钻孔体应变仪和伸缩仪记录资料对比
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
先对安装在湖州地震台"7号"人防山洞内的伸缩仪记录的线应变求得面应变,以及对安装在同一个山洞内的钻孔体应变仪进行气压消除后,对两者的同步观测数据进行对比和分析。以地球应变固体潮为参照,确定两种应变观测数据基本一致。证明这两种基线长度和安装方式不同的仪器,观测到的地层面应变在固体潮频段具有可比性。
In this article, plane strain data were obtained from the line side strain recorded by extensometer installed in No.7 air defense cave of Huzhou Seismic Station, and the record of body drilling volume strain meter installed in the same cave, after eliminating gas pressure.Both synchronous data were compared and analyzed.Taking the strain solid tide of the Earth as the reference, it is found that the two types of data are basically the same strain and is proved that the surface strains observed by the two type equipments, with different length of the baseline and installation modes, are comparable in the band of solid tide.
引文
明成山,李金锦,李哲.锦州地震台体积式钻孔应变仪的映震情况[J].地震地磁观测与研究,2005,26(增刊):48-52.
    张学阳.潮汐观测中高精度气压辅助观测的必要性及气压效应的校正[J].地壳形变与地震,1987,4(4) :273-280.
    中国地震局编制.地震几前兆数字观测技术规范[M].北京:地震出版社,2001.
    梅尔基奥尔P.杜品仁等译.行星地球的固体潮[M].北京:科学出版社,1984.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心