两种不同求和路径的叠前时间偏移方法
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
介绍了等效偏移距偏移和非成像炮集偏移的基本原理,二者都是用一个新的偏移距变量代替常规的偏移距,然后对以新的偏移距变量定义的旅行时双曲线进行动校正和叠加,从而实现叠前时间偏移。叠前时间偏移是对双平方根方程定义的旅行时曲面的绕射求和,而这两种方法的区别就在于其在该曲面上定义的求和路径不同。在金属矿勘探中,金属矿脉由于其成因受构造剧烈运动等因素的影响,往往倾角陡,规模小,大多呈非水平层分布,而这两种方法可以为金属矿成像提供较好的成像方法。
This paper describes the basic principle of Equivalent Offset Migration and Non-imaging Shot-record Migration.They both replace the usual offset coordinate with a new offset variable.The result of prestack time migration is followed by NMO and stack over the hyperbolic traveltime curve defined by the new offset variable.It is realized that prestack time migration is diffraction summation over the traveltime surface described by the double square root equation.The difference between the two methods is that they define different summation paths over the traveltime surface.The two methods can used to seismic imaging in the metal ores exploration.
引文
[1]Bancroft J C,Geiger H D.Equivalent offset CRP gathers[C]//64thAnn Internat Mtg,Soc Expl Geophys,Expanded Abstracts:672-675.
    [2]Berryhill J R.System and method of seismic shot-record migration:US,5,544,126[P].1996-08-06.
    [3]Fowler P J.A comparative overview of prestack time migrationmethods[C]//67th Ann Internat Mtg,Soc Expl Geophys,Ex-panded Abstracts,1997:1571-1574.
    [4]渥.伊尔马滋.地震资料分析——地震资料处理、反演和解释[M]刘怀山,王克斌,童思友,等译.北京:石油工业出版社,2006.
    [5]Bancroft J C,Geiger H D,Wang S,et al.Prestack migration byequivalent offsets and CSP gathers:an update[R].1995 ResearchReport,CREWES,1995.
    [6]Bancroft J C,Geiger H D,Margrave G F.The equivalent offsetmethod of prestack time migration[J].Geophysics,1998,63(6):2042-2053.
    [7]Bancroft J C,Li X.Efficient computation of the equivalent offsettraveltimes for EOM[G]//SEG Expanded Abstracts,1998.
    [8]王伟,尹军杰,刘学伟,等.等效偏移距方法及应用[J].地球物理学报,2007,50(6):1823-1830.
    [9]Popovici A M.Berryhill's"pure migration"=Gardner's PSI[R].Stanford Exploration Project,2001,Report 82:1-11.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心