汶川地震人员死亡率及经济易损性探讨
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
由于高震级、高烈度地震的发生在某一区域是小样本事件,基于区域历史震例的震害预测方法对强震损失的快速评估结果具有很大的局限性;因此探讨利用时效性高的孤立强震震例进行震后的快速评估分析具有重要的现实意义。系统整理了汶川地震的震害资料,以烈度区和行政区划为分类单元建立了汶川地震损失数据库。利用震区内130个县、市的震害数据,选用USGS PAGER系统中的人员死亡率与地震烈度的函数模型计算得到了区域适用的人员死亡率。利用汶川地震的经济损失记录,建立了极灾区、严重灾区、重灾区和受灾区的经济损失比,在此基础上,利用历史震例对人员死亡率及经济损失比的有效性进行了验证。结果表明,模型及相应的损失率能够较好地估计川滇地区强震可能造成的人员死亡及经济损失。
Earthquake loss assessment methods based on the case statistics of the regional low-intensity earthquakes have limitations due to the scarcity of high-magnitude,high-intensity earthquakes in a specific region.Thus,the loss assessment methods based on historical cases can not meet assessment requirements of the current socio-economic vulnerability.For this reason,exploring suitable methods which use the latest single case of strong earthquake to estimate the current seismic vulnerability of the region has practical significance.This paper compiles earthquake damage data systematically,establishes Wenchuan earthquake loss database using intensity and administrative divisions as classification rule.Using the earthquake disaster data in 130 counties/cities and the empirical mortality model in USGS PAGER,we got regional applicable mortality.Besides,using the economic loss records,this paper establishes the GDP-direct-economic losses-ratio for the extremely,severely,heavily destroyed areas and affected areas respectively.By comparing the actual losses of some earthquakes happening in Yunnan Province with the estimation using the mortality and GDP-direct-economic-losses ratio,we can find the effectiveness of these models in Sichuan & Yunnan provinces.
引文
[1]陈颙,陈棋福,陈凌.地震损失预测评估中的易损性分析[J].中国地震,1999,15(2):97-105.CHEN Yong,CHEN Qifu,CHEN Ling.Vulnerability analysis in earthquake loss estimate[J].China Earthquake,1999,15(2):97-105.(inChinese)
    [2]刘吉夫.宏观震害预测方法在小尺度空间上的适用性研究[D].北京:中国地震局地球物理所,2006.LIU Jifu.The Study on Applicability of Macroscopic Vulnerability in Small Scale Space[D].Beijing:The Geophysics Institute of ChinaEarthquake Bureau.2006.(in Chinese)
    [3]王晓青,丁香,王龙,等.四川汶川8级大地震灾害损失快速评估研究[J].地震学报,2009,31(2):205-211.WANG Xiaoqing,DING Xiang,WANG Long,et al.A study on fast earthquake loss assessment and its application to 2008 Wenchuan M8earthquake[J].Earthquake Science,2009,31(2):205-211.(in Chinese)
    [4]李晓杰,姜立新,杨天青.强震人员损失回归预测方法[J].西北地震学报,2012,34(1):44-49.LI Xiaojie,JIANG lixin,YANG Tianqing.Estimation of strong earthquake casualties using empirical regression Method[J].NorthwesternSeismological Journal,2012,34(1):44-49.(in Chinese)
    [5]姜立新,聂高众,帅向华,等.我国地震应急指挥技术体系初探[J].自然灾害学报,2003,12(2):1-6.JIANG Lixin,NIE Gaozhong,SHUAI Xianghua,et al.Primary exploration of earthquake emergency command system in China[J].Journal ofNatural Disasters,2003,12(2):1-6.(in Chinese)
    [6]帅向华,姜立新,王栋梁.国家地震应急指挥软件系统研究[J].自然灾害学报,2009,18(3):99-104.SHUAI Xianghua,JIANG Lixin,WANG Dongliang.Study of national earthquake emergency command software system[J].Journal of NaturalDisasters,2009,18(3):99-104.(in Chinese)
    [7]CHEN Qifu,CHEN Yong,LIU Jie,et al.Quick and approximate estimation of earthquake loss based on macroscopic index of exposure andpopulation distribution[J].Natural Hazards,1997,15:217-229.
    [8]Jaiswal K,Wald D J,Hearne M.Estimating casualties for large earthquakes worldwide using an empirical approach[D].USGS Open-FileReport,2009.
    [9]Proter K A,Jaiseal K S,Wald D J,et al.Fatality models for the U.S.Geological Survey’s prompt assessment of global earthquakes for responsesystem[C].Beijing,China.The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering,2008.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心