临猗5.0级地震前后品质因子值变化特征研究
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
利用西安数字地震遥测台网记录的数字地震资料,采用P波初动半周期残差法求得 1998 年 7月临猗5.0级地震前后不同路径的Q(品质因子)值变化,发现在地震发生前Q值为87~203,震后Q值为67~164,震前震中区附近出现明显的高Q值异常。结果表明,地震前的高Q值异常可以作为地震预测的一种手段。
By using the digital data recorded by Xi’an digital telemetry seismic network,the temporal change in Q-factor before and after Linyi earthquake with M_L=5.0 in July,1998 is determined through the method for half period of the first arrival P wave. It is pointed that the Q-factor is 87~203 before the earthquake and is 67~164 after the earthquake,and clear anomaly with high Q-factor appeared in the nearby areas of the epicenter before the earthquake. The result shows that anomaly with high Q-factor before a earthquake can be used as a method for earthquake forecast.
引文
[1] AkiK.Scattering and attenuation[J].BullSeimSocAmer,1982,72:319~330.
    [2] WinklerK,NurA Seismic attenuation:effects of pore flu ids and frictional sliding[J].Geophysics,1982,47:1~15.
    [3] 国家地震局科技监测司.地震现场工作大纲和震情分析指南[M].北京:地震出版社,1990.
    [4] 张国民,傅征祥,桂燮泰,等.地震预报引论[M].北京:地震出版社,2001.
    [5] GladwinM T,StaceyF D.An elastic degradation of acoustic pul ses in rock[J].PhysEarthPlanetInter,1974,8:332~336.
    [6] 王卫东,王平,杜长娥渭河断陷盆地及邻近地区地震活动的深部背景[J]地球科学与环境学报,2004,26(3):57~60
    [7] 卓钰如.不同类型地震发生区域的Q 值特征[J].地震,1985,(2):44~48.
    [8] 林邦慧.1977年5月12日宁河地震烈度明显偏低的探讨[J].地球物理学报,1979,22(1):14~24.
    [9] MasakazuOhtake.Temporal change ofQP 1 in focal area of1984 westernNagano,Japan earthquake as derived form pulsewidth analysis[J].J GeophysRes,1987,92(B6):4846~4852.
    [10] 刘祖源岩石中地震波衰减的实验研究[J].地震科学研究,1983,(6):34~40.
    [11] 徐果明岩石的饱和度对地震波衰减的影响[J].地震地磁观测与研究,1985,6(6):123~127.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心