1995年7月20日河北沙城M_L4.1地震序列破裂过程中应力变化的研究

英文篇名：VARIATION OF STRESS DURING THE RUPTURE PROCESS OF THE 1995 M_L=4.1 SHACHENG, HEBEI, CHINA, EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE
中文刊名：地震学报
英文刊名：Acta Seismologica Sinica
作者：陈学忠 ; 许向彤 ; 翟文杰
英文作者：Chen Xuezhong 1) Xu Xiangtong 1) Zhai Wenjie 2) 1) Institute of Geophysics ; China Earthquake Administration ; Beijing 100081 ; China 2) Earthquake Administration of Liaoning Province ; Shenyang 110031 ; China
中文关键词：沙城地震序列 ; 视应力 ; 应力降 ; 应力变化
英文关键词：Shacheng earthquake sequence ; apparent stress ; stress drop ; variation of stress
出版日期：2005-06-15
机构：中国地震局地球物理研究所 ,中国地震局地球物理研究所 ,辽宁省地震局中国北京100081,中国北京100081,中国沈阳110031
年：2005
期：03
出版单位：地震学报

摘要

根据地震破裂动力学,研究了1995年7月20日河北沙城ML4.1地震序列破裂过程中,视应力和静态应力降与动态应力降之差的变化.结果表明,主震的视应力约为5MPa,而余震的视应力平均约为0.047MPa.在破裂过程中,主震的动态应力降大约为静态应力降的1.6倍,其差值约为2.7MPa;余震的动态应力降一致小于静态应力降,其差值平均约为-0.75MPa.因此,主震发生时,最终应力大于动摩擦应力,与断层突然锁住的模式相符;余震发生时,最终应力小于动摩擦应力,与地震断层错动过头的模式相符.因此,主震和余震的发生过程是有差别的.
According to the rupture dynamics of earthquakes, variations of the apparent stress and the difference between the static stress drop and the dynamic stress drop during the rupture of earthquakes are analyzed for the July 20, 1995 M_L=4.1 Shacheng, Hebei, China, earthquake sequence. Results obtained show that the apparent stress for mainshock is about 5 MPa, and the average apparent stress for aftershocks 0.047 MPa. During the rupture of the mainshock, the dynamic stress drop is approximately 1.6 times greater than the static stress drop with the difference of nearly 2.7 MPa. The dynamic stress drop is less than the static stress drop for all aftershocks with the average difference of -0.75 MPa. Therefore, when the mainshock occurs the final stress on the focal fault is higher than the dynamic frictional stress, corresponding to that the fault is abruptly locked. When the aftershocks occur the final stress on the focal fault is lower than the dynamic frictional stress, corresponding to that the fault overshoots. It can be seen from the above results that there could be some differences in the physic processes between the mainshock and the aftershocks.

引文

陈运泰.2003.地震能量和地震效率[A].见:中国地震局监测预报司编.地震参数数字地震学在地震预测中的应用[C].北京:地震出版社,51～72
    王培德,王鸣,任道容,等.1995.中国欧共体地震科学合作项目“北京西北延庆怀来盆地地震学研究”进展[J].地震地磁观测与研究,16(6):8～14
    徐果明,周蕙兰.1982.地震学原理[M].北京:科学出版社,339
    许向彤,陈运泰,王培德.1997.怀来盆地的构造应力场[J].地震地磁观测与研究,18(1):1～8
    许向彤,陈运泰,王培德.1999.1995年7月20日怀来盆地ML=4.1地震的破裂过程[J].地震学报,21(6):570～582
    许向彤,陈运泰,王培德.2001.1995年7月20日怀来盆地ML4.1地震序列震源参数的精确测定[J].地震学报,23(3):225～238
    AkiK.1967.Scalinglawofseismicspectrum[J].JGeophysRes,72:1217～1231
    BthM,DudaSJ.1964.Earthquakevolume,faultplanearea,seismicenergy,strain,deformation,andrelatedquanti ties[J].AnnGeofisRome,17:353～368
    ChenYT.1996.SeismologicalstudyoftheYanqing Huailaibasin,northwestofBeijing[A].In:DepartmentofInterna tionalScientificandTechnologicalCooperationSSTC,Chinaed.SuccessfulSino EuropeanScienceandTechnology Cooperation1981～1995[C].Beijing:TsinghuaUniversityPress,134～139
    ChoyGL,BoatwrightJL.1995.Globalpatternsofradiatedseismicenergyandapparentstress[J].JGeophysRes,100:18205～18228
    IdeS,BerozaGC.2001.Doesapparentstressvarywithearthquakesize?[J].GeophysResLett,28:3349～3352
    IzutaniY,KanamoriH.2001.Scale dependenceofseismicenergy to momentratioforstrike slipearthquakesinJapan[J].GeophysResLett,28:4007～4010
    SavageJC,WoodMD.1971.Therelationbetweenapparentstressandstressdrop[J].BullSeismSocAmer,61:1381～1388
    WuZL.2001.Scalingofapparentstressfrombroadbandradiatedenergycatalogueandseismicmomentcatalogueandits focalmechanismdependence[J].EarthPlanetsSpace,53:943～948
    WyssM.1970.Apparentstressesofearthquakesonridgescomparedtoapparentstressesofearthquakesintrenches[J].GeophysJRastrSoc,19:479～484