基于TM遥感数据的汶川地震极重灾区生态恢复研究

英文篇名：Research on Ecological Restoration in Wenchuan Earthquake Badly-damaged Regions Based on TM
中文刊名：地球信息科学学报
英文刊名：Journal of Geo-Information Science
作者：吴春生 ; 王文杰 ; 刘孝富 ; 张哲 ; 郭翔 ; 陈晨 ; 冯宇
英文作者：WU Chunsheng1 ; 2 ; WANG Wenjie2 ; LIU Xiaofu2 ; 3 ; ZHANG Zhe2 ; GUO Xiang1 ; 2 ; CHEN Chen1 ; 2 and FENG Yu2(1.College of Architecture and Urban Planning ; Hunan University of Science and Technology ; Xiangtan 411201 ; China ; 2.Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Science ; Beijing 100012 ; China ; 3.Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster ; Beijing Normal University ; Beijing 100875 ; China)
中文关键词：汶川地震 ; 生态恢复 ; Landsat TM
英文关键词：Wenchuan Earthquake ; ecological recovery ; Landsat TM
出版日期：2012-10-15
机构：湖南科技大学建筑与城乡规划学院;中国环境科学研究院;北京师范大学环境演变与自然灾害教育部重点实验室;
年：2012
期：05
出版单位：地球信息科学学报

摘要

本文以地震极重灾区2006、2008和2011年3期Landsat TM遥感影像为数据源,利用GIS提取灾区土地利用信息,结合坡度和高程等地形因子对灾区主要生态系统面积的变化进行综合分析。结果表明:2008年地震对灾区生态环境造成严重破坏,使研究区农田、森林和草地生态系统分别减少了124.6km2、461.6km2和92.3km2,其中,农田在北川、青川和平武的面积减少量最大,汶川森林面积减少了285.5km2;各生态系统在不同的高程和坡度下受地震影响程度存在很大差异;至2011年,灾区受损生态环境受自然演替和人工修复干扰影响,农田、森林和草地生态系统有所恢复,面积分别增加了82.8km2、58.3km2和174.9km2,其中,草地面积增加量超过受地震破坏损失量,但灾区生态系统整体恢复效果不理想,还需要采取进一步的生态恢复措施。
Wenchuan Earthquake caused great damage to the ecological environment in the disaster-stricken area.In order to know the current recovery of the ecological environment damaged by the earthquake and provide data support for relevant researchers and decision makers,this paper took Landsat TM remote sensing images of June or July during 2006,2008 and 2011 of Wenchuan earthquake disaster-stricken area as data sources,used computerized and artificial visual interpretation method to extract the land uses information of the study area,and combined topographic factors such as elevation and slope to comprehensively analyze the reasons of the change of major ecosystems(farmland,forest and grassland).The results showed that the earthquake damaged the ecosystem of the study area seriously,resulting in substantial shrinking of farmland,forest and grassland by 124.6km2,461.6km2 and 92.3km2 respectively in the study area,and the farmland ecosystem had the most serious loss in Beichuan,Qingchuan and Pingwu counties,while the forest ecosystem lost 285.5km2 in Wenchuan County.The degree of influence on each ecosystem also varies a lot according to different altitudes and slopes.Up to the 2011,the status of the damaged ecosystem had got better in the study area through natural succession and artificial restoration intervention.Farmland,forest and grassland ecosystems had experienced certain degree of recovery,their areas increased 82.8km2,58.3km2 and 174.9km2 respectively.The recovery of farmland and forest ecosystems is not satisfactory while the area of grassland ecosystem had got the most increase,in 2011 which had exceeded the reduced area damaged by the earthquake in 2008,whereas the whole recovery of the ecosystems in research area was not ideal.Further measures of ecological recovery are thus in dire need of.

引文

[1]欧阳志云,徐卫华,王学志,等.汶川大地震对生态系统的影响[J].生态学报,2008,28(12):5801-5809.
    [2]徐新良,江东,庄大方,等.汶川地震灾害核心区生态环境影响评估[J].生态学报,2008,28(12):5899-5908.
    [3]Sun M J,Chen B F,Ren J Z,et al.Natural disastersimpact evaluation of rural householdsvulnerability:The case of Wenchan Earthquake[J].Agriculture andAgricultural Science Procedia,2010,1:52-61.
    [4]王文杰,潘英姿,徐卫华,等.四川汶川地震对生态系统破坏及其生态影响分析[J].环境科学研究,2008,21(5):110-116.
    [5]Wasowsik J,Keefer D K,Lee C T.Toward the nextgeneration of research on earthquake-induced landslides:Current issues and future challenges[J].EngineeringGeology,2011,122(1):1-8.
    [6]王涛,马寅生,龙长兴,等.四川汶川地震断裂活动和次生地质灾害浅析[J].地质通报,2008,27(11):1913-1922.
    [7]王庆安,毛竹,张翔,等.汶川地震极重灾区地形起伏度特征及其与生态环境受损关联分析[J].四川环境,2009,28(5):44-49.
    [8]王秀英,聂高众.汶川M_S8.0级地震诱发崩塌特点及其与地震动参数对应关系初断[J].岩土工程学报,2009,31(9):1378-1383.
    [9]Tang C,Zhu J,Qi X,et al.Landslides induced bythe Wenchuan Earthquake and the subsequent strongrainfall event:A case study in the Beichuan area ofChina[J].Engineering Geology,2011,122(2):22-33.
    [10]崔鹏,韦方强,陈晓清,等.汶川地震次生山地灾害及其减灾对策[J].中国科学院院刊,2008,23(4):317-323.
    [11]徐国栋,方伟华,史培军,等.汶川地震损失快速评估[J].地震工程与工程振动,2008,28(6):74-83.
    [12]王秀英,聂高众,王登伟.利用强震记录分析汶川地震诱发滑坡[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(11):2369-2376.
    [13]张春敏,王根绪.不同地震烈度对灾区景观破坏程度的评价[J].生态学报,2008,28(12):5938-5947.
    [14]张春敏,王根绪.汶川大地震灾害对区域生态系统的影响——以青川、平武和茂县为例[J].生态学报,2008,28(12):5833-5841.
    [15]刘孝富,段培强,王维,等.成都地震重灾区生态影像分区及恢复对策[J].环境科学研究,2010,23(6):711-718.
    [16]包维楷,庞学勇.四川汶川大地震重灾区灾后生态退化及其基本特点[J].应用与环境生物学报,2008,14(4):441-444.
    [17]吴宁,卢涛,罗鹏,等.地震对山地生态系统的影响——以5.12汶川大地震为例[J].生态学报,2008,28(12):5810-5819.
    [18]Lu T,Shi F S,Sun G,et al.Reconstruction of Wen-chuan Earthquake-damaged ecosystems:Four impor-tant questions[J].应用与环境生物学报,2010,16(3):301-304.
    [19]徐卫华,欧阳志云,王学志,等.汶川地震重灾区生态保护重要性评价与对策[J].生态学报,2008,28(12):5820-5825.
    [20]四川省环境保护科学研究院.5.12汶川大地震极重灾区生态破坏评估[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社,2010,13-16.
    [21]靖娟利,李景文,韦春桃.Landsat TM在山区生态环境动态监测中的应用——以广西兴安县为例[J].桂林工学院学报,2006,26(4):529-533.
    [22]戴昌达,雷莉萍.TM图像的光谱信息特征与最佳波段组合[J].环境遥感,1989,4(4):282-292.
    [23]卢玉东,尹黎明,何丙辉,等.利用TM影像在土地利用/覆盖遥感解译中波段选取研究[J].西南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2005,27(4):479-482.
    [24]中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.GB/T21010-2007,土地利用现状分类[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2007,1-9.