小西湖黄河大桥剪力滞效应试验和理论研究对比
|
摘要
兰州市小西湖黄河大桥采用矮塔斜拉桥方案,桥跨布置为81.2 m+136 m+81.2 m,单索面,主梁采用梯形截面单箱三室箱梁,是我国仅有的几座部分斜拉桥之一。针对大桥设计中部分斜拉桥箱梁的剪力滞效应及抗震性能等关键技术问题,采用主桥整体有机玻璃缩尺模型进行了剪力滞效应及动力特性的模型试验研究,并同时对该模型进行了理论对比研究。模型试验结果与有限元分析结果吻合较好,说明采用有限元方法能够较好地计算出部分斜拉桥的剪力滞效应和动力特性。因此,可以通过有限元分析计算出实桥的剪力滞效应和动力性能。
The project of Xiaoxihu Yellow River Bridge in Lanzhou was chosen as partial cable stayed bridge,whose span is 81.2m+136m+81.2m with single rank ropes.The height of the tower is 17m and the main beam was adopted as three cell single box whose beam was fixed to the tower and the piers were separated from the beam.In view of some key techniques such as shear lag effect and aseismatic performance during bridge design,organic glass scaled model is applied to have a experiment and a theory research at one time.The experiment result is basically same as the theory calculation,which indicated that shear lag effect and dy?namical performance can be well calculated by FEA method.As a result,FEA method may be used to calcu?late shear lag effect and dynamical performance of the real bridge model.
The project of Xiaoxihu Yellow River Bridge in Lanzhou was chosen as partial cable stayed bridge,whose span is 81.2m+136m+81.2m with single rank ropes.The height of the tower is 17m and the main beam was adopted as three cell single box whose beam was fixed to the tower and the piers were separated from the beam.In view of some key techniques such as shear lag effect and aseismatic performance during bridge design,organic glass scaled model is applied to have a experiment and a theory research at one time.The experiment result is basically same as the theory calculation,which indicated that shear lag effect and dy?namical performance can be well calculated by FEA method.As a result,FEA method may be used to calcu?late shear lag effect and dynamical performance of the real bridge model.
引文
[1]张启伟,张士铎.单索面斜拉桥箱梁恒载剪力滞效应分析[J].中国公路学报,1997,10(1):39~43.
[2]曹国辉,方志.钢筋混凝土箱梁剪力滞效应试验研究[J].中南公路工程,2000,25(3):26~28.
[3]吴海林,季文玉.箱梁剪力滞效应影响参数分析[J].工程力学,2000,2(C00):572~577.
[4]彭卫,陆光闾.混凝土箱梁的剪力滞效应对徐变的影响[J].桥梁建设,1998,(1):28~30.
[5]谢旭,黄剑源.薄壁箱型梁剪力滞效应分析的刚度法[J].工程力学,1995,12(2):95~102.
[6]程翔云,罗旗帜.箱梁在压弯荷载共同作用下的剪力滞[J].土木工程学报,1991,24(1):52~64.
[7]陈兴冲.采用不同隔震支座时桥梁隔震性能的比较[J].工程力学,1999.
[8]徐忠根,周福霖.日本桥梁隔震规范评述[J].世界地震工程,1999.
[9]李建中,袁万城.连续梁桥减,隔震体系的优化设计[J].土木工程学报,1998.
[10]周云,周福霖.桥梁震害与减震防灾新对策[J].世界地震工程,1997.
[11]曾攀,闫贵平.隔震桥梁延性地震响应分析理论探讨[J].工程力学,2000.
[12]叶爱君,胡世德,等.大跨度桥梁抗震设计实用方法[J].土木工程学报,2001.
[13]Psycharis I N,Jennings P C.Rocking of slender rigid bodiesallowed to uplift[J].Earthquake Engineering and StructuralDynamics,1983,(11):57~76.
[14]Yim C-S,Chopra A K.Earthquake response of structureswith partial uplift on Winkler foundation[J].EarthquakeEngineering and Structural Dynamics,1984,(12):263~281.
[2]曹国辉,方志.钢筋混凝土箱梁剪力滞效应试验研究[J].中南公路工程,2000,25(3):26~28.
[3]吴海林,季文玉.箱梁剪力滞效应影响参数分析[J].工程力学,2000,2(C00):572~577.
[4]彭卫,陆光闾.混凝土箱梁的剪力滞效应对徐变的影响[J].桥梁建设,1998,(1):28~30.
[5]谢旭,黄剑源.薄壁箱型梁剪力滞效应分析的刚度法[J].工程力学,1995,12(2):95~102.
[6]程翔云,罗旗帜.箱梁在压弯荷载共同作用下的剪力滞[J].土木工程学报,1991,24(1):52~64.
[7]陈兴冲.采用不同隔震支座时桥梁隔震性能的比较[J].工程力学,1999.
[8]徐忠根,周福霖.日本桥梁隔震规范评述[J].世界地震工程,1999.
[9]李建中,袁万城.连续梁桥减,隔震体系的优化设计[J].土木工程学报,1998.
[10]周云,周福霖.桥梁震害与减震防灾新对策[J].世界地震工程,1997.
[11]曾攀,闫贵平.隔震桥梁延性地震响应分析理论探讨[J].工程力学,2000.
[12]叶爱君,胡世德,等.大跨度桥梁抗震设计实用方法[J].土木工程学报,2001.
[13]Psycharis I N,Jennings P C.Rocking of slender rigid bodiesallowed to uplift[J].Earthquake Engineering and StructuralDynamics,1983,(11):57~76.
[14]Yim C-S,Chopra A K.Earthquake response of structureswith partial uplift on Winkler foundation[J].EarthquakeEngineering and Structural Dynamics,1984,(12):263~281.
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心