节理岩体隧道围岩稳定性判定指标合理性研究
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
隧道围岩失稳模式和稳定性判据一直是工程界争论的焦点,迄今没有科学合理的标准,常以洞周位移或塑性区经验值作为稳定性判定指标。洞周位移受围岩弹模、隧道形状等因素影响,而且不同部位变形值差异很大,很难找到统一标准;以塑性区作为稳定性判据优于以位移作为判据,围岩塑性化反映连续介质宏观塑性流动力学动态,而不能用于量化判定由优势结构面控制节理岩体破坏的隧道稳定性。文章结合细观节理形态和变化,通过UDEC离散元程序,研究节理岩体隧道失稳模式及量化的稳定性判定指标,探讨了细观结构机制和宏观力学行为关系。结果表明:(1)结构面极大地削弱岩体力学性质及其稳定性,结构面变形与强度性质对于隧道稳定性起着关键控制性作用;(2)节理岩体隧道扰动区可划分为脱落区、张开区和剪切滑移区,其中脱落区表征围岩失稳模式,张开区围岩处于脱落临界状态,即塌方潜在区域;(3)剪切滑移区是诱发围岩发生渐进性破坏主因,提出将剪切滑移区作为节理岩体隧道稳定性判定指标具有严格力学依据,可以定量化评价围岩稳定程度。最后,以在建兰渝铁路木寨岭隧道为例,对比了锚杆支护前后力学效应,验证了以剪切滑移区作为节理岩体隧道稳定性判定指标的可靠性、合理性和现实性。
The instability model and criterion for the stability of tunnels in jointed rock masses have been a subject of debate,and no scientific and reasonable standard has been reached for the subject so far.The empirical value of the displacement around the tunnel and plastic zone is deemed the criterion for stability of surrounding rock;elastic modulus and the shape of a tunnel have a great influence on the displacement around the tunnel.Additionally,displacements around a tunnel are unequal at different positions.For these reasons,it is difficult to settle upon a unified criterion.The empirical value of the plastic zone is superior to the displacement around the tunnel when it comes to the stability criterion.The plastification of surrounding material reflects the plastic dynamic mechanics of continuous media,but it cannot be adopted to quantitatively evaluate the tunnel stability in a jointed rock mass in which failure is induced by a preferred structural plane.Therefore,combined with the shapes and changes of micro-joints,the instability mode and quantitative criterion for the stability of a tunnel are studied by means of UDEC,and the relationship of the mechanisms of micro-structure and macro-mechanical behavior is analyzed.The conclusions are as follows:(1) The structural plane greatly weakens the mechanic property of the rock mass and its stability.Deformation and the strength of the structural plane play the controlling role in tunnel stability;(2) In the jointed rock mass,the disturbance zone of the surrounding rock is divided into failure shape,open zone and shear and slip zone.The failure means the instability mode of the tunnel,and the open zone means that surrounding rock is under the shedding critical condition,which creates a potential landslide area;(3) The shear and slip zone is the main cause of progressive damage of rock masses,so the shear zone is proposed as the criterion for stability of a tunnel in a jointed rock mass.Based on its strict mechanical foundation,the stability of a rock mass can be evaluated quantitatively.Using the Muzhailing Tunnel of the Lanzhou-Chongqing Passenger Dedicated Line as an example,the mechanical effects of surrounding rock are investigated before and after the implementation of bolt support,which verified the reliability,rationality and feasibility of using the shear and slip zone as the criterion for stability of a tunnel in a jointed rock mass.
引文
[1]朱维申,李术才,陈卫忠.节理岩体破坏机理和锚固效应及工程应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2002 Zhu Weishen,Li Shucai,Chen Weizhong.Failure Mechanism and Anchoring Effect of Jointed Rock Mass and Its Engineering Application[M].Beijing:Science Press,2002
    [2]徐筠,赵明阶.节理裂隙岩体渐进破坏机理研究综述[J].地下空间与工程学报,2008,4(3):554-560 Xu Jun,Zhao Mingjie.Research Overview of the Progressive Failure Mechanism for Jointed Rock Mass[J].Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,2008,4(3):554-560
    [3]喻言,柳群义,冯德山.隧道岩体稳定性的非线性单元安全系数分析[J].中南大学学报,2010,41(3):1085-1089 Yu Yan,Liu Qunyi,Feng Deshan.Stability Analysis for Tunnel Rock Mass based on Nonlinear Element Safety Factor[J].Journal of Central South University,2010,41(3):1085-1089
    [4]郑颖人,邱陈瑜,张红,等.关于土体隧洞围岩稳定性分析方法的探索[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(10):1968-1980 Zheng Yingren,Qiu Chenyu,Zhang Hong,et al.Exploration of Stability Analysis Method for Surrounding Rocks of Soil Tunnel[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2008,27(10):1968-1980
    [5]徐干成,白洪才,郑颖人,等.地下工程支护结构[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2001 Xu Gancheng,Bai Hongcai,Zheng Yingren,et al.Support Structure of Underground Engineering[M].Beijing:China WaterPower Press,2001
    [6]蒋建平,汪明武,罗国煜.地下工程中岩土结构面的影响分析[J].工程地质学报,2003,11(4):349-353 Jiang Jianping,Wang Mingwu,Luo Guoyu.Analysis of Effect of Structural Planes in Rock Mass and Soil Mass on Underground Works[J].Journal of Engineering Geology,2003,11(4):349-353
    [7]蒋建平,章杨松,罗国煜,等.优势结构面理论在岩土工程中的应用[J].水利学报,2001,(8):90-96 Jiang Jianping,Zhang Yangsong,Luo Guoyu,et al.The Application of Preferred Plane Theory to Geotechnical Engineering Practice[J].Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,2001,(8):90-96
    [8]张清照,沈明荣,张龙波.结构面在卸载条件下的力学特性研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2009,5(6):1126-1130,1137 Zhang Qingzhao,Shen Mingrong,Zhang Longbo.Study on the Mechanical Properties of Rock Discontinuity under Unloading[J].Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,2009,5(6):1126-1130,1137
    [9]刘磊.节理破碎岩体隧道稳定性及锚固效果研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2010 Liu Lei.Study on Stability of Tunnel in Jointed Fractured Rock Mass and Effect of Anchoringt[D].Chengdu:Southwest Jiaotong University,2010
    [10]B.Shen,N.Barton.The Disturbed Zone around Tunnels in Jointed Rock Masses[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,1997,34(1):117-125
    [11]杜时贵.岩体结构面的工程性质[M].北京:地震出版社,1999 Du Shigui.Engineering Properties of Structural Plane of Rock Mass[M].Beijing:Seismological Press,1999
    [12]王明年,李玉文.公路隧道围岩亚级分级方法[M].成都:西南交通大学出版社,2008 Wang Mingnian,Li Yuwen.Sub-classification Method of Surrounding Rock in Road Tunnelling[M].Chengdu:Southwest Jiaotong University Press,2008

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心