大跨度预应力混凝土连续刚构桥动力特性及P-Δ效应分析
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
以某已建成的连续刚构桥为研究对象,采用Midas/civil 2010有限元程序,建立连续刚构桥有限元模型,分析了连续刚构桥采用钢筋混凝土双薄壁实心墩、双薄壁空心墩和单柱式空心墩三种截面形式的动力特性和分别在纵向地震和横桥向地震作用下结构的PΔ效应。研究结果表明:三种不同截面类型的桥梁自振频率依次增大,不同的桥墩截面形式使桥梁结构的振型序列发生变化;在三种桥墩截面形式下,考虑P-Δ效应后,对纵向地震响应的影响显著而对横向地震响应的影响较小,但P-Δ效应并不影响桥梁结构的时程曲线趋势。
With a completed continuous rigid-frame bridge as the object of our research,the finite element program Midas/civil 2010 is used to help establish a finite element calculating model for the continuous rigid-frame bridge.The dynamic characteristics and P-Δ effects of the continuous rigid frame bridge respectively with the double thin-walled solid pillars,the double thin-walled hollow pillars and the single-column hollow pillar respectively under the action of the longitudinal earthquake and the bridge-crossing earthquake are analyzed in the paper.The research results show that the self-vibration frequencies of the three kinds of bridges increase in turn.The mode shape sequence changes with the different cross-section types of the pier.With all the three different cross-section types taken into consideration,the influence of the P-Δ effects on the longitudinal seismic response is obvious while the influence of the P-Δ effects on the lateral seismic response is comparatively small.However,the P-Δ effects have no impact on the trend of the time-history curve.
引文
[1]周勇军,贺拴海,张岗,等.桥墩截面形式对弯连续刚构桥地震响应的影响[J].公路交通科技,2009,26(2):68-71
    [2]李子春.桥墩形式对连续刚构桥动力特性的影响[J].中国公路学报,2011,24(2):70-76
    [3]王维,李斌.不同桥墩形式对连续刚构桥抗震性能影响[J].公路工程,2007,32(5):101-104
    [4]陈海波,刘保东.大跨度高墩连续刚构桥空间地震响应分析[J].工程抗震与加固改造,2005,27(3):78-80
    [5]童申家,童岳生.水平地震力作用下框架结构二阶效应影响分析[J].工业建筑,2000,30(8):17-20
    [6]董淑喜,靳奉涛.青岛海湾大桥沧口航道桥自振特性分析[J].公路,2009(09):11-13
    [7]徐贤昭,董继恩,王欣南.石佛沟特大桥抗震特性探讨[J].中外公路,2010(05):200-203
    [8]宋一凡.公路桥梁动力学[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2000

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心