水体作用下U形薄壁渡槽的振动特性

英文篇名：Dynamic Characteristics Research of U-shape Thin-wall Aqueduct under the Action of Fluid
中文刊名：噪声与振动控制
英文刊名：Noise and Vibration Control
作者：王清云 ; 孙元元 ; 周生通 ; 白新理
英文作者：WANG Qing-yun1 ; SUN Yuan-yuan1 ; ZHOU Sheng-tong2 ; BAI Xin-li1(1.School of Civil Engineering and Communication ; North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power ; Zhengzhou 450011 ; China ; 2.State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration ; Shanghai Jiaotong University ; Shanghai 200240 ; China)
中文关键词：振动与波 ; U形薄壁渡槽 ; 势流模型 ; Westergard模型 ; iWestergard模型 ; 振动特性
英文关键词：vibration and wave ; u-shape thin-wall aqueduct ; potential-based fluid model ; Westergaard model ; i Westergaard model ; dynamic characteristics
出版日期：2012-08-18
机构：华北水利水电学院土木与交通学院;上海交通大学机械系统与振动国家重点实验室;
年：2012
期：04
出版单位：噪声与振动控制

摘要

基于势流体理论和Westergaard理论建立两种考虑水体作用的U型薄壁渡槽有限元模型。在两种模型的基础上做模态分析,得到了不同水深下的U形薄壁渡槽的振动特性。对比分析两种模型不同水深下的模态计算结果,得到了:(1)随水深增加,渡槽结构固有频率降低;(2)Westergaard模型计算结果低于势流模型;(3)水深对同一振型频率的影响程度在两种模型中也是不同。在结果对比分析的基础上,提出一种改进的Westergaard模型(iWestergaard模型),结果显示改进的Westergaard模型结果与势流结果吻合的很好。
Two types of U-shape thin-wall aqueduct models with considering the action of fluid were established according to the potential-based fluid theory and Westergaard theory respectively.With these two models,modal analysis of the aqueduct was conducted,and the effects of water depth on the modal results were also analyzed.Comparing modal results of between these two models,it was found that:(1) the natural frequencies of aqueduct decrease with the increase of water depth;(2) the modal results of Westergaard model are lower than these of potential-based fluid model;moreover,(3) the effects of water depth on the natural frequencies corresponding to the same mode shapes are also different in these two models.On the basis of the comprehensive results comparisons and analysis,an improved Westergaard model(iWestergaard model) was proposed,results showed that the results of i Westergaard model are agree well with these of potential-based fluid model.

引文

[1]Lesmez M W,Wiggert D C,Hatfield F J.Modal analysisof vibrations in liquid-filled piping systems[J].ASMEJournal of Fluids Engineering,1990,112:311-318.
    [2]沈荣瀛,胡剑凌.充液管道振动研究[J].噪声与振动控制,1996,5:18-23.
    [3]毛庆,张景绘.处理载流管道流固耦合效应的附加质量法[C].上海:第十三届全国反应堆结构力学会议论文集,2004.
    [4]金长明,王赣城,高康,陈婷艳,李鸿光.充液管道的传递矩阵法分析[J].噪声与振动控制,2009,6:30-33.
    [5]张多新,王清云,白新理.大型渡槽结构动力学研究进展[J].自然灾害学报,2011,20(4):22-30.
    [6]白新理,郭瑞卿等.双洎河渡槽动力特性分析[J].中国水运,2007,7(10):102-103.
    [7]白新理,李玉河,周生通,王清云.基于遗传算法的沙河渡槽优化设计[J].人民长江,2008,39(20):31-33.
    [8]Bathe K.J.Finite element procedures[M].Prentice Hall,1996.
    [9]ADINA R&D,Inc.ADINA theory and modeling guide volume I:ADINA solids&structures[R].Report ARD 10-7,2010.
    [10]赵光恒.结构动力学[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,1976:144-162.
    [11]高况现,李正农,等.渡槽结构地震反应分析[J].水力发电学报,2004,23(5):41-43.
    [12]周生通.考虑流固耦合的U形渡槽地震反应分析[D].郑州:华北水利水电学院,2009.