关于饱和砂土液化判别方法的几点思考

英文篇名：Considerations on Discriminating Methods of Sandy Soil Liquefaction
中文刊名：公路
英文刊名：Highway
作者：佘跃心
英文作者：SHE Yue xin (1 Huaiyin Institute of Technology ; Huai'an 223001 ; Hehai University ; Nanjing 210098 ; China)
中文关键词：临界标贯击数 ; 剪应力比 ; 场地液化
英文关键词：critical standard penetration hammer ; shear stress ratio ; site liquefaction
出版日期：2002-08-30
机构：淮阴工学院建筑工程系淮安市223001,河海大学岩土工程研究所南京市210098
年：2002
期：08
出版单位：公路

摘要

针对 GBJ11-89或 GBJG5 0 0 11-2 0 0 1抗震设计规范液化判别式土层埋深对临界标贯值影响、液化判别等几个方面做了分析 ,并将规范判别式与修正 Seed简化法做了比较。分析结果表明随土层埋深增加临界标贯击数增加是符合液化原理的 ,也不能因为某些极端情况否认规范判别式的正确性
Discussion and analysis are made for the impact of sands depth on critical standard penetration hammer and discrimination of liquefaction, and then the formula of liquefaction discrimination is compared with Seed's simplified procedure. The results are consistent with the liquefaction principle that critical standard penetration hammer increases with the increasing of sands depth, and the validity of liquefaction discrimination formula can't be denied because of some extreme conditions.

引文

[1]　Seed,H.B.,Idriss,I.M.(1971).Simplified procedurefor evaluating soil liquefaction potential.J.SoilMech.AndFound.Div.,ASCE,97(9).
    [2]　Seed,H.B.,Tokimatsu,K.,Harder,L .F.,Chung,R.M.(1985).Influence ofSPT procedures in soilliquefaction resistance evaluations.J.Geotech.Engrg.,ASCE,111(12).
    [3]　周锡元,王广军,苏经宇.场地地基设计地震.北京:地震出版社
    [4]　刘金韬,金晓媚.饱和砂土液化判别方法中问题浅析.工程地质学报,2000(3).
    [5]　赵伟,张晓炜.关于地震液化判别公式的探讨.公路,2001(9).
    [6]　T.L.Youd,I.M.Idriss.Liquefaction resistance ofsoils:summary report from the1996NCEER and1998NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation ofliquefaction resistance of soils.J.Geotech. andGeoenvir.Engreg.ASCE,127(4).
    [7]　石兆吉,张荣祥,顾宝和.砂土液化判别和评价综合方法研究.地震工程和工程振动,1997(1).
    [8]　Juang,C.H.,Chon,C.J.,TaoJiang,Andurs,R.D.(2000).Rsik-based liquefaction potential evaluationusing standard penetration tests[J].Can.Geotech.J