是假设有误还是运气不佳:地震危险性图为什么需要客观检验
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
<正>近年来,许多破坏性大地震都发生在地震危险性图中明确标注为危险性相对较低的地方。令人惊奇的是,虽然许多国家都在使用这样的地震危险性图,但其效果却从未得到客观验证。
引文
[1]Gardner D.Future Babble:Why Expert Predictions Fail———and Why We Believe Them Anyway.McClel-land&Stewart,Toronto,2010
    [2]Kerr R.Seismic crystal ball proving mostly cloudy around the world.Science,2011,332:912-913
    [3]Geller R J.Shake-up time for Japanese seismology.Nature,2011,472:407-409
    [4]Moseley J B,O’Malley K,Petersen N J,et al.A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee.New England Journal of Medicine,2002,347(2):81-88
    [5]Stephenson D B.Use of the“Odds Ratio”for diagnosing forecast skill.Weather and Forecasting,2000,15:221-232
    [6]Jackson D D,Kagan Y Y.The2004Parkfield earthquake,the1985prediction,and characteristic earth-quakes:Lessons for the future.Bull.Seism.Soc.Am.,2006,96:S397-S409
    [7]Stein S,Okal E.The size of the2011Tohoku earthquake needn’t have been a surprise.Eos,2011,92:227-228
    [8]Swafford L,Stein S.Limitations of the short earthquake record for seismicity and seismic hazard studies.In:Stein S and Mazzotti S(eds.),Continental Intraplate Earthquakes,Special Paper,2007,425:49-58.Geological Society of America,Boulder,Colorado
    [9]Liu M,Stein S,Wang H.2000years of migrating earthquakes in north China:How earthquakes in mid-continents differ from those at plate boundaries.Lithosphere,2011,3(2):128-132

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心