黄土室内液化试验饱和方法的研究现状及前景展望

英文篇名：Status quo and prospect of research on saturated methods in loess liquefaction test
中文刊名：世界地震工程
英文刊名：World Earthquake Engineering
作者：王平 ; 王谦 ; 王兰民 ; 马海萍 ; 王鼐
英文作者：WANG Ping1 ; 2 ; 3 ; WANG Qian1 ; 2 ; 3 ; WANG Lanmin1 ; 2 ; 3 ; MA Haiping1 ; WANG Nai1 ; 2 ; 3(1.Lanzhou Institute of Seismology ; China Earthquake Administration(CEA) ; Lanzhou 730000 ; China ; 2.Open Laboratory of Loess Earthquake Engineering ; CEA ; Lanzhou 730000 ; China ; 3.Geotechnical Disaster Prevention Engineering Technology Research Center of Gansu Province ; CEA ; Lanzhou 730000 ; China)
中文关键词：黄土液化 ; 饱和方法 ; 研究现状 ; 展望
英文关键词：loess liquefaction ; saturated method ; research status quo ; prospect
出版日期：2011-12-15
机构：中国地震局兰州地震研究所;中国地震局黄土地震工程开放实验室;甘肃省岩土防灾工程技术研究中心;
年：2011
期：04
出版单位：世界地震工程

摘要

黄土液化是黄土地区的三大典型震害之一,是黄土动力学研究的前沿课题;截至目前,室内动三轴液化试验仍是研究黄土液化的主要方法,而试样饱和度的高低是影响黄土液化试验结果的关键因素;首先从土的性质和饱和的主要指标对砂土和黄土饱和的差异进行了对比,而后通过对现行的主要饱和方法进行了详细的叙述,归纳总结了黄土室内液化试验饱和方法的研究现状,同时结合黄土本身大孔隙、弱胶结的特性,就现行主要饱和方法对黄土饱和的适用性进行了评述,提出了每一方法的优缺点;并结合反压饱和方法在黄土饱和中的应用现状,对该方法在黄土饱和中的应用前景进行了展望。
Loess liquefaction is one of the typical earthquake damages in the loess region,which is the most advanced subjects of loess dynamics in recent years.Up to now,the dynamic triaxial test is still the main method to study loess liquefaction,and the saturated degree is the main influence factors of the test.In this paper,the difference between sand liquefaction and loess liquefaction was compared based on the analysis of the soil characteristics and saturated indexes,and the study situation of saturated methods was summarized based on discusses of the main saturated methods.Meanwhile,the applicability of the methods for loess sample saturated was commented by involving the big pore and weakly cemented properties of the loess.Finally,the prospect of the application of back pressure method in loess sample saturated test was discussed based on the application actualities of the method in the loess saturated test.

引文

[1]王兰民等.黄土动力学[M].地震出版社,2003.
    [2]何开明,王兰民,王峻,曾国熙.黄土液化与砂土液化的差异浅析.地震研究.2001.24(2):146-14
    [3]石兆吉,王兰民.土壤动力特性.液化势及危害性评价[M].北京:地震出版社.1999
    [4]Prakash S,Puri V K.Liquefaction of loessial soils[A]Proceeding of3rd international earthquake microzonation conference[C].1982.Vo1.1:l101-l107.
    [5]Puri V K.Liquefaction behavior and dynamic properties of loessial(silty)soils[D].Mo.U.S:University of Missouri-Rolla.1984.
    [6]王兰民等.饱和黄土液化机理与特性的试验研究.岩土工程学报.2000.第22卷第1期:89-94
    [7]刘公社,巫志辉.动荷载下饱和黄土的孔压演化规律及其在地基动力分析中的应用[J].工业建筑.1994(3):40-44.
    [8]刘汉龙,余跃心,王兰民.强夯黄土地基液化试验研究[A].土动力学与岩土地震工程[c].北京:中国建筑工业出版社.2002.218-223.
    [9]孙海妹,王兰民,刘红玫,王平.原状黄土的反压饱和法试验研究.防灾减灾工程学报.2010.30(1):98-102.
    [10]BSI,Shear strength tests[S]:BS1377:Part8,1990
    [11]ASTM,Annual Book of ASTM Standards[S].ASTM D4767-95:850-859.
    [12]金艳丽,戴福初.饱和黄土的静态液化特性试验研究[J].岩土力学.2008.29(12):113-124.