地壳形变短临异常与地下水位短临异常关系及识别方法的初步研究
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
对1976以来华北地区MS≥5.0地震前的地壳形变和地下水位资料进行了系统整理,分析研究了地壳形变短临异常与地下水位短临异常间的关系。假如把相距不超过70 km的一组形变与水位异常称为一个异常对次,则有:①临震异常对次远远小于短期异常对次;无论是短期异常还是临震异常,形变异常开始时间大部分早于水位异常开始时间;②在短期异常过程中,变形压或压缩与水位升、变形张或膨胀与水位升的异常对次所占比例不高;变形压或压缩与水位降、变形张或膨胀与水位降的异常对次所占比例较高,且变形张或膨胀与水位降占优。在临震异常过程中,变形压或压缩与水位升的异常对次所占比例远远大于变形张或膨胀与水位升的;③地壳形变短临异常与地下水位短临异常的关系可表示为y=a0x+a1,其中y和x分别为地下水位和地壳形变短临异常观测值。最后提出了判断短临前兆异常的新方法,即异常放大法。
Through analyzing the crustal deformation and groundwater level data in North China before M_S≥5.0 earthquakes since 1976,we study the relation of short-term and impending-earthquake anomalies between crustal deformation and groundwater level.If we regard the deformation and water level anomalies that appear less than 70 km apart early or later as a pair of anomalies,the result shows: (1) The number of impending-earthquake anomaly pairs is far less than that of short-term anomaly pairs;most deformation anomalies appear earlier than groundwater level anomalies.(2) During the periods of short-term anomalies,the compressive-deformation and water-level-rising anomalies as well as expansion-deformation and water-level-rising anomalies take a low proportion of the total anomalies,however,the compressive-deformation and water-level-dropping anomalies and expansion-deformation and water-level-dropping anomalies take a high proportion relatively,and expansion-deformation and water-level-dropping anomaly pairs are more of them.In the impending-earthquake anomaly periods,the proportion of compressive-deformation and water-level-rising anomalies is far more than that of expansion-deformation and water-level-rising anomalies.(3) The relation of short-term and impending-earthquake anomalies between crustal deformation and groundwater level is y=a_0x+a_1,where y and x are the observed values of groundwater level and crustal deformation in short-term and impending-earthquake periods respectively,a_0 is the coefficient and a_0 is the constant.Meanwhile,we put forward a new method identifying short-term and impending-earthquake anomaly—Anomaly amplification method.
引文
[1]K ing C Y,Azuma S,Igarash i G,et al.Earthquake-related water-level changes at 16 closely clustered wells in Tono,central Japan[J].JGR,1999,104(B6):13073-13082.
    [2]牛安福.地壳形变的突变性与地震短期预报[D].北京:中国地震局地球物理研究所,2000.
    [3]陆明勇,黄辅琼,刘善华,等.地壳变形与地下水相互作用及其异常关系初探[J].地震,2005,25(1):67-73.
    [4]焦明若,张国民.地震前兆复杂性成因机理研究的讨论(一)──地震前兆复杂性的表现形式[J].地震,1998,18(1):14-19.
    [5]陆明勇,牛安福,鲁德顺,等.地壳形变与地下水动态异常特征研究进展[J].西北地震学报,2005,27(1):89-95.
    [6]Ge S,Stover S C.Hydrodynam ic response to strike-and d ip-slipfau lting in a half-space[J].JGR,2000,105(B11):25513-25524.
    [7]车用太,刘五洲,鱼金子,等.板内强震的中地壳硬夹层孕震与流体促震假设[J].地震学报,2000,22(1):93-101.
    [8]王吉易,宋贯一,曹志成,等.地下水诱发的浅层前兆异常及其机理与有关的地震预报问题[J].华北地震科学,2002,20(2):28-41,20(3):1-13,2003,21(1):1-10.
    [9]张肈诚,罗兰格,李海华,等.中国震例(1976-1980)[M].北京:地震出版社,1990.
    [10]张肈诚,罗兰格,李海华,等.中国震例(1981-1985)[M].北京:地震出版社,1990.
    [11]张肈诚,郑大林,徐京华,等.中国震例(1986-1988)[M].北京:地震出版社,1999.
    [12]张肈诚,郑大林,徐京华,等.中国震例(1989-1991)[M].北京:地震出版社,2000.
    [13]陈棋福,郑大林,车时.中国震例(1992-1994)[M].北京:地震出版社,2002.
    [14]陈棋福,郑大林,刘桂萍,等.中国震例(1995-1996)[M].北京:地震出版社,2002.
    [15]陈棋福,郑大林,高荣胜.中国震例(1997-1999)[M].北京:地震出版社,2003.
    [16]国家地震局《一九七六年唐山地震》编辑组.一九七六年唐山地震[M].北京:地震出版社,1982.
    [17]国家地震局科研处.唐山地震考察与研究[M].北京:地震出版社,1981.
    [18]国家地震局科技监测司.大同—阳高地震研究[M].北京:地震出版社,1993.
    [19]中国地震局监测预报司.一九九八年张北地震[M].北京:地震出版社,1999.
    [20]车用太,王基华,林元武,等.张北—尚义地震前的地下流体异常及其跟踪预报[J].地震地质,1998,20(2):99-104.
    [21]汪成民,车用太,万迪堃,等.地下水微动态研究[M].北京:地震出版社,1988.
    ①震例研究和报告编写规范,关于印发《震例研究和报告编写规范》及第三批中国大陆震例研究项目工作安排的通知(中震测[2000]068号),2000.
    ①唐山地震地形变资料汇编组.1976年唐山7.8级地震观测资料汇编(地形变部分).1980
    ②唐山地震地下水位资料汇编组.1976年唐山7.8级地震观测资料汇编(地下水位部分).1981.
    ①唐山地震地形变资料汇编组.1976年唐山7.8级地震观测资料汇编(地形变部分).1980.
    ②唐山地震地下水位资料汇编组.1976年唐山7.8级地震观测资料汇编(地下水位部分).1981.
    ①首都圈地区震情短临跟踪判定组,中国地震局地震预测研究所,河北省地震局,中国地震局地壳应力研究所,张家口中心台,赤城地震台.河北赤城台水位、倾斜、水温异常落实报告.2004年10月10日.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心