马边-永善地震带及邻区新构造应力场和现代构造应力场的探讨
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
本文用数学统计方法对马边-永善地震带及邻近地区水系格局的优势方向进行了计算,结合断层滑动参数、原地应力测量、地震震源机制解和三角测量资料进行对比分析认为:构造应力分区与活动的深大断裂围限的褶断隆起区和凹陷区有关,如马边凹陷区构造应力方向为NW向,而雷波-永善褶断隆起区和五莲峰褶断隆起区构造应力方向为NWW-NEE向。该区构造应力场有右旋渐变的特点,自南而北主压应力轴右旋转动约30~40°,并且,全新世以来的现代构造应力场继承了新构造时期构造应力场的特点。
This paper presents a comparison analysis on the drainage pattern, fault slip data, focal mechanism and in-situ stress measurement in the Mabian-Yongshan earthquake belt and its adjacent areas. It is suggested that there are a south and a north area separated by active fault and active tectonics. The directions of principal compression stresses are different, due to the difference of geologic structures. The direction of principal compression stress turned from NEE to NWW then to NW in the southern part of Wulianfeng fault-fold upwarping region and Leibo-Yongshan fault-fold upwarping region to the northern part Mabian downwarping region. The results clearly show that the direction of principal compression stress produce 30°-40° right-turning since late Tertiary period in the areas.
引文
[1]韩德润等,马边-永善地震带构造形式及地震特征,地震地质,Vol.15,No.3,1996。
    [2]侯治华等,曲靖-昭通断裂北段晚第四纪活动特征,地壳构造与地壳应力集(11),北京:地震出版 社,1998。
    [3]尹国康,地貌发育的趋向与变异,地理学报,Vol.41,No.3,1986。
    [4]艾南山等,水系分布方向计算的密集度方法,地理学报,No.1,1985。
    [5]谢富仁等,内昆线天星场至仙水段构造应力场分析,地壳构造与地壳应力集(12),北京:地震出版 社,1999。
    [6]安其美等,金沙江溪洛渡水电站水压致裂法地应力测量研究,中国大陆地壳应力环境研究,北京: 地质出版社,2003。
    [7]刁桂林,永善-大关7.1级地震序列震源区应力场分析,华北地震科学,Vol.13,No.1,1995。
    [8]李天祒,浅析控震构造与发震构造,地震研究,Vol.4,No.3,1981。

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心