屋顶钢塔TMD和塔底隔震双重减震性能研究
|
摘要
本文利用有限元软件SAP2000建立了某四层钢框架模型,对其未设置屋顶钢塔、仅设置屋顶钢塔及设置屋顶钢塔和TMD三种模型进行了不同地震波下的时程分析和比较。结果表明,未设置屋顶钢塔时,主体结构在地震作用下反应最强烈;仅设置屋顶钢塔时主体结构反应相对较弱,钢塔在鞭梢效应下反应最为强烈;设置屋顶钢塔和TMD时主体与钢塔结构的反应同时达到最弱。研究表明屋顶钢塔和TMD能够同时有效的减小主体结构与屋顶钢塔的地震反应,避免了屋顶钢塔的鞭梢效应,达到了较好的减震效果。
In this paper,one four-floor steel frame mode was built by huge general use finite element software SAP 2000.Under the different earthquake waves had time history analysis and comparison with three modes: the mode without steel tower atop building,the mode only with the steel tower atop building and with a TMD system of the steel tower atop building.The analysis results show: under the condition of without steel tower atop building,the main structure has the most obvious response;under the condition of steel tower atop building the response is relatively weak and the steel tower atop building has the most great reaction under the whiplash effect;while with the TMD of the steel tower atop building,the reaction of the main structure and steel tower decline to their lowest point.The research suggests that the TMD of the steel tower on the top of the building can reduce the earthquake response of main structure and steel tower effectively,and simultaneously,avoid the whiplash effect and get a better damping shake effect.
In this paper,one four-floor steel frame mode was built by huge general use finite element software SAP 2000.Under the different earthquake waves had time history analysis and comparison with three modes: the mode without steel tower atop building,the mode only with the steel tower atop building and with a TMD system of the steel tower atop building.The analysis results show: under the condition of without steel tower atop building,the main structure has the most obvious response;under the condition of steel tower atop building the response is relatively weak and the steel tower atop building has the most great reaction under the whiplash effect;while with the TMD of the steel tower atop building,the reaction of the main structure and steel tower decline to their lowest point.The research suggests that the TMD of the steel tower on the top of the building can reduce the earthquake response of main structure and steel tower effectively,and simultaneously,avoid the whiplash effect and get a better damping shake effect.
引文
[1]Soong T T,Dargush G F.结构工程中的被动消能系统[M].董平译.北京:科学出版社,2005.
[2]施卫星,李正升.建筑结构基础隔震系统的发展及应用[J].结构工程师,1997,(1):14-18.
[3]苏经宇,曾德民.我国建筑结构隔震技术的研究与应用[J].地震工程与工程振动,2001,21(4):94-101.
[4]北京金土木软件技术有限公司,中国建筑标准设计研究院.SAP2000中文版使用指南[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2006.
[5]王优龙.隔震技术的研究与应用[M].北京:地震出版社,1991.
[6]周福霖.工程结构减震控制[M].北京:地震出版社,1997.
[7]GB 50011-2001,建筑抗震设计规范[S].
[8]吴波,李慧.建筑结构被动控制的理论与应用[M].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学出版社,1997.
[9]曲淑英,王心健,初明进,等.高层结构的鞭梢效应分析[J].工业建筑,2001,31(10):28-30.
[10]何益斌.屋顶增设铁塔后原有结构抗震性能分析[J].建筑结构,1999,(3):49-51.
[11]程季达,俞嘉声,瞿伟廉.高层建筑顶部突出物的地震反应分析[J].防灾减灾工程学报,1987,(1):26-32.
[2]施卫星,李正升.建筑结构基础隔震系统的发展及应用[J].结构工程师,1997,(1):14-18.
[3]苏经宇,曾德民.我国建筑结构隔震技术的研究与应用[J].地震工程与工程振动,2001,21(4):94-101.
[4]北京金土木软件技术有限公司,中国建筑标准设计研究院.SAP2000中文版使用指南[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2006.
[5]王优龙.隔震技术的研究与应用[M].北京:地震出版社,1991.
[6]周福霖.工程结构减震控制[M].北京:地震出版社,1997.
[7]GB 50011-2001,建筑抗震设计规范[S].
[8]吴波,李慧.建筑结构被动控制的理论与应用[M].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学出版社,1997.
[9]曲淑英,王心健,初明进,等.高层结构的鞭梢效应分析[J].工业建筑,2001,31(10):28-30.
[10]何益斌.屋顶增设铁塔后原有结构抗震性能分析[J].建筑结构,1999,(3):49-51.
[11]程季达,俞嘉声,瞿伟廉.高层建筑顶部突出物的地震反应分析[J].防灾减灾工程学报,1987,(1):26-32.
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心