关于“弘治中兴”之评价问题

英文篇名：On the Evalulation of "Hong Zhi Resurgence"
中文刊名：河西学院学报
英文刊名：Journal of Hexi University
作者：赵永翔
英文作者：Zhao Yong-xiang(History and Cultwle School ; Lanzhou university ; Lanzhou ; Gansu ; 730020)
中文关键词：弘治中兴 ; 明孝宗 ; 评价
英文关键词：Resurgence of Hong Zhi ; Emperor Zhu Yongtang of the Ming Dynasty ; Evalulation
出版日期：2009-02-25
机构：兰州大学历史文化学院;
年：2009
期：01
出版单位：河西学院学报

摘要

明孝宗朱佑樘的"弘治中兴"自明清以来就是一个为学者所争论不休的话题,褒扬者有之,怀疑者亦有之。文章分析了弘治朝的功过是非,认为所谓的"弘治中兴"名不副实,它只是一个短暂、勉强的"治世"。尽管存在诸多弊政,但是明孝宗宽厚仁和的政治品行、弘治朝君子众多、君臣关系融洽等政治特色却为这一朝带来了美誉。
As a controversial topic,the emperor Zhu Youtang's "resurgence of HongZhi" in the Ming Dynasty had been eulogized by some scholars and suspected by other scholars since Ming and Qing dynasties.After analyzing the merits and demerits of Hong Zhi period,this paper argues that the so-called" resurgence of Hong Zhi "was unworthy of the name,but only a temporary and debilitated "peaceful times".Although it had many political maladies,emperor zhu Yongtang's benevolent behaviors,numerous honest statesmen,the harmonious relationship between the emperor and subordinates and many other distinctive political Characterics,had brought good reputation to this period.

引文

[1]明孝宗实录[M].台北:中央研究院历史语言所校印本,1983.
    [2]谈迁.国榷[M].北京:中华书局,1958.
    [3]张廷玉.明史[M].北京:中华书局,1974.
    [4]王其榘.明代内阁制度史[M].北京:中华书局,1981.
    [5]刘婧,赵中男.一身功过,重予评说——《弘治皇帝大传》读后[J].兰州:西北师大学报(社会科学版),1995(5).
    [6]焦竑.玉堂丛语[M].北京:中华书局,1981.
    [7]沈德符.万历野获编[M].北京:中华书局,1959.
    [8]夏燮.明通鉴[M].北京:北京中华书局,1959.
    [9]陈子龙.明经世文编[M].北京:中华书局,1962.
    [10]王世世.世世堂世世[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
    [11]查继佐,罪惟录.第二册[M].杭州:浙江古籍出版社,1986.
    [12]李洵.明史食货志校注[M].北京:中华书局,1982.
    [13]郭厚安.明实录经济资料选编[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1989.
    [14]白寿彝.中国通史.第九卷(上册)[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2004.
    [15]陈洪谟.治世余闻[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
    [16]郑晓.今言[M].北京:中华书局,1984.
    [17]余继登.典故纪闻[M].北京:中华书局,1981.
    [18]谷应泰.明史记事本末[M].北京:中华书局,1977.
    [19]张居正.张太岳世[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1984.
    ①李绍强.试论明孝宗的赋税政策[J].北方论丛,1992.5;张宏斌.论弘治时的皇权与内官干涉[J].渭南师专学报,1999(3).
    ②高文学.中国自然灾害史[M].北京:地震出版社,1997.