用户名: 密码: 验证码:
猫儿山小鲵(Hynobius maoershanensis)繁殖期生境选择
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Habitat selection by Hynobius maoershanensis during its breeding period
  • 作者:黄华苑 ; 卜荣平 ; 谢海 ; 侯绍兵 ; 武正军
  • 英文作者:HUANG Huayuan;BU Rongping;XIE Hai;HOU Shaobing;WU Zhengjun;Key Laboratory of Rare and Endangered Animal and Plant Ecology and Environmental Protection, Ministry of Education, Guangxi Normal University;Guangxi Key Laboratory of Rare and Endangered Animal Ecology, Guangxi Normal University;
  • 关键词:猫儿山小鲵 ; 繁殖期 ; 生境选择 ; 生境特征
  • 英文关键词:Hynobius maoershanensis;;breeding season;;habitat selection;;habitat characteristic
  • 中文刊名:生态学报
  • 英文刊名:Acta Ecologica Sinica
  • 机构:珍稀濒危动植物生态与环境保护教育部重点实验室广西师范大学;广西珍稀濒危动物生态学重点实验室广西师范大学;
  • 出版日期:2019-05-31 16:54
  • 出版单位:生态学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:17
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金项目(31860609);; 广西自然科学基金(2015GXNSFAA139066,2018GXNSFAA138114);; 广西师范大学博士科研启动基金(2016BQ001)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:261-269
  • 页数:9
  • CN:11-2031/Q
  • ISSN:1000-0933
  • 分类号:Q958
摘要
在广西猫儿山自然保护区的山顶湖、三江源、野人湖等地区,基于植被类型、水体类型、岸边条件、卵袋悬挂物、水中覆盖物、人为干扰程度等20种生境因子,通过61个样方(26个选择样方和35个对照样方),对猫儿山小鲵繁殖期的生境选择做进行了研究,并得出以下4个主要结论:(1)在基于描述型生态因子的研究中,结果显示选择样方与对照样方在水体类型、岸边条件、水中覆盖物3种因子上差异显著,而植被类型、卵袋悬挂物、人为干扰程度3种生态因子对其生境选择无显著影响。(2)基于14种数值型生态因子的研究结果显示,选择样方和对照样方间的植被盖度、水体面积、水体流速和水底泥沙比方面具有显著差异。植被盖度较低、水体面积较大的水域、水体流速低和水底泥沙比较低的水域是猫儿山小鲵的优选繁殖地。(3)基于14种数值型生态因子的逐步判别表明,通过植被盖度和水底泥沙比2个生态因子可分辨选择样方和对照样方,正确判别率达80.3%,且对于检验也具有最大的贡献值,分别为0.840和0.622。(4)对猫儿山小鲵卵袋对数和14种数值型生态因子的逐步回归分析结果显示猫儿山小鲵在繁殖期生境选择与地表湿度显著正相关,与植被盖度呈显著负相关,高地表湿度和低植被盖度对猫儿山小鲵的产卵量起促进作用。猫儿山小鲵繁殖期间偏好的微生境为较低植被盖度、较大面积水体和较低流速、低水底泥沙、多水中覆盖物、复杂岸边条件的静水型水塘,与选择偏好的微生境相关的生态因子是猫儿山小鲵繁殖期生境选择的主要因子。
        Habitat selection by Hynobius maoershanensis was performed during the reproductive period in Maoershan Natural Reserve in Guangxi, including Peak Lake, Three Rivers, and Savage Lake. Sixty-one plots were randomly set up, with egg bags for the selected plots and no egg bags for the control plots, to survey 20 types of habitat factors(e.g., temperature and humidity, vegetation type, vegetation coverage, water area, water depth, water type, bottom sand ratio, and human disturbance).(1) The results of 6 descriptive ecological factors revealed significant differences among 3 factors(shore condition, water cover, and water body) for selecting quadrats and control plots and no significant differences in the other 3 ecological factors(vegetation type, degree of human disturbance, and egg bag suspension).(2) The results of 9 factors with abnormal distribution showed that vegetation coverage, water-sediment ratio, water flow rate, and water area were significantly different between the selected quadrats and control plots, indicating that H. maoershanensis favored lower vegetation cover, lower water sediment, lower water velocity, and larger water body area to lay eggs.(3) The stepwise discrimination of 14 numerical ecological factors showed that the correct discrimination rate for the selected quadrats and control plots by vegetation coverage(largest contribution, 0.840) and sediment concentration(second largest contribution, 0.622) was 80.3%.(4) Stepwise regression analysis of the number of egg bags and 14 types of ecological factors showed a significant positive correlation between the selected habitat and surface humidity for H. maoershanensis and a significant negative correlation with vegetation cover. The high surface humidity and low vegetation coverage promoted the spawning capacity of H. maoershanensis. In conclusion, the micro-habitat preferred by H. maoershanensis is a hydrostatic pond with low water velocity, low vegetation coverage, large amount of water cover, relatively low sediment concentration, complex shore condition, and large water area, which act as the main factors for habitat selection during the breeding period of H. maoershanensis.
引文
[1] 颜忠诚,陈永林.动物的生境选择.生态学杂志,1998,17(2):43- 49.
    [2] 魏辅文,冯祚建,王祖望.野生动物对生境选择的研究概况.动物学杂志,1998,33(4):48- 52.
    [3] Hutto R L.Habitat selection by nonbreeding,migratory land birds//Cody M L,ed.Habitat Selection in Birds.London:Academic Press,1985:455- 476.
    [4] Johnson D H.The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference.Ecology,1980,61(1):65- 71.
    [5] MacArthur R,Recher H,Cody M.On the relation between habitat selection and species diversity.The American Naturalist,1966,100(913):319- 332.
    [6] Rosenzweig M L.On the evolution of habitat selection.Proc Int Congr Ecol 1st,1974:401- 404.
    [7] Holt R D.Population dynamics in two-patch environments:some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution.Theoretical Population Biology,1985,28(2):181- 208.
    [8] Lawlor L R,Smith J M.The coevolution and stability of competing species.The American Naturalist,1976,110(971):79- 99.
    [9] 冯骏,张继辉,疏义林,姚龙,唐鑫生,吴海龙.皖南凹耳臭蛙地理分布格局与生境选择.生态学报,2015,35(17):5638- 5647.
    [10] Sebastiano S,Antonio R,Fabrizio O,Dario O,Roberta M.Different season,different strategies:feeding ecology of two syntopic forest-dwelling salamanders.Acta Oecologica,2012,43:42- 50.
    [11] 肖玥,赵晨皓,刘伟,吴永杰,冉江洪.若尔盖湿地骨顶鸡的繁殖生态及适应性探讨.四川动物,2017,36(2):217- 222.
    [12] 刘鹏,张微微.官山自然保护区白颈长尾雉季节性生境选择.生态学报,2017,37(18):6005- 6013.
    [13] 陈乐勇,张立世,吴慧,秦博,李时,姜云垒.放牧干扰对栗斑腹鹀繁殖的影响.东北林业大学学报,2017,45(5):96- 100.
    [14] 丁虎林,张航,陈旭才,刘伟,李凯,石永志,唐思贤.浙江天童三种鹎科鸟类栖息地利用和季节变化.复旦学报:自然科学版,2013,(6),737- 745.
    [15] 葛小芳,孟凡露,王朋,盛岩,王卫平,冯金朝,薛达元,孟秀祥.大兴安岭驯鹿(Rangifer tarandus)的春季生境选择.生态学报,2015,35(15):5000- 5008.
    [16] 李路云,杨会涛,滕丽微,刘振生.张广才岭藏獾洞穴生境选择.生态学报,2015,35(14):4836- 4842.
    [17] Wilen B O,Frayer W E.Status and trends of U.S.wetlands and deepwater habitats.Forest Ecology and Management,1990,33- 34:181- 192.
    [18] Hitchings S P,Beebee T J C.Loss of genetic diversity and fitness in common toad (Bufo bufo) populations isolated by inimical habitat.Journal of Evolutionary Biology,1998,11(3):269- 283.
    [19] 周洲,谢锋,江建平,郑中华.两栖动物种群衰退研究进展.应用与环境生物学报,2004,10(1):128- 132.
    [20] 周立志,宋榆钧,田蕴.长春市南湖公园两栖类的生境选择和营养生态的初步研究.淮北煤师院学报,1998,19(1):64- 70.
    [21] Anderson A M,Haukos D A,Anderson J T.Habitat use by anurans emerging and breeding in Playa Wetlands.Wildlife Society Bulletin,1999,27(3):759- 769.
    [22] Parris K M.Distribution,habitat requirements and conservation of the cascade treefrog (Litoria pearsoniana,Anura:Hylidae).Biological Conservation,2001,99(3):285- 292.
    [23] 周伟,李明会.鮡科鱼类多样性与栖境的关系.云南农业大学学报,2006,21(6):811- 815,830- 830.
    [24] 戴建洪,戴强,张明,张晋东,李成,刘兵,刘志军,王跃招.若尔盖湿地国家自然保护区三种无尾两栖类夏秋季生境选择.动物学研究,2005,26(3):263- 271.
    [25] 罗玉梅,朴正吉,王卓聪,王超,睢亚橙.长白山两栖类繁殖期路域水生境选择性分析.四川动物,2015,34(4):559- 564.
    [26] 吴迪,岳峰,罗祖奎,王天厚.上海大莲湖湖泊湿地两栖动物群落分布及生境选择模式.复旦学报:自然科学版,2011,50(3):268- 273.
    [27] 周绍春,孟根同,尹远新,杨娇,于洪伟,任梦飞,刘浩.完达山东部林区生境特征对东北林蛙产卵的影响.生态学报,2016,36(9):2521- 2527.
    [28] Keating K A,Cherry S.Use and interpretation of logistic regression in habitat-selection studies.Journal of Wildlife Management,2004,68(4):774- 789.
    [29] Garnham J I,Stockwell M P,Pollard C J,et al.Winter microhabitat selection of a threatened pond amphibian in constructed urban wetlands.Austral Ecology,2015,40(7):816- 826.
    [30] Sanuy D,Joly P.Olfactory cues and breeding habitat selection in the natterjack toad,Bufo calamita.Amphibia-Reptilia,2009,30(4):555- 559.
    [31] Burger R M,Boylan J,Aucone B M.The effects of phototaxis and thigmotaxis on microhabitat selection by a caecilian amphibian (genus Ichthyophis).The Herpetological Journal,2007,17(1):19- 23.
    [32] 庾太林,张良建,刘晓辉,吴云韩.广西北部湾海陆交错带两栖动物对生境的选择.四川动物,2013,32(6):883- 888.
    [33] Hairston N G.An experimental test of a guild:salamander competition.Ecology,1981,62(1):65- 72.
    [34] Keen W H.Habitat selection and interspecific competition in two species of plethodontid salamanders.Ecology,1982,63(1):94- 102.
    [35] 叶林骏.安吉小鲵生存现状及其繁殖期生境特征研究[D].金华:浙江师范大学,2012.
    [36] 齐银,Felix Z,戴强,王勇,杨勇,王波,王跃招.若尔盖高寒湿地高原林蛙繁殖后期运动、家域和微生境选择.动物学报,2007,53(6):974- 981.
    [37] 鲍方印,高国富,王松,崔峰,康健.鹞落坪自然保护区文县疣螈的生境选择和食性分析.华中师范大学学报:自然科学版,2012,46(2):208- 213.
    [38] 王松,鲍方印,戚永跃,徐景霞.鹞落坪自然保护区商城肥鲵的资源分布及生境选择.氨基酸和生物资源,2009,31(1):4- 7,12- 12.
    [39] 费冬波.湖南莽山国家级自然保护区宜章臭蛙与花臭蛙繁殖期的生境选择与种群动态研究[D].长沙:中南林业科技大学,2010.
    [40] 郭克疾.挂榜山小鲵的繁殖生态学研究[D].长沙:湖南师范大学,2006.
    [41] 姜雅风,王丽文,阎学林,卜宁.千山地区东北小鲵的生态资料.四川动物,1987,6(3):32- 34.
    [42] 王宏元,柴丽红,李忻怡,张育辉.中国11种有尾两栖动物生存状况的统计评估.陕西师范大学学报:自然科学版,2010,38(2):73- 75,82- 82.
    [43] 周放,蒋爱伍,蒋得斌.中国两栖类一新种(有尾目,小鲵科).动物分类学报,2006,31(3):670- 674.
    [44] 江建平,谢锋,臧春鑫,蔡蕾,李成,王斌,李家堂,王杰,胡军华,王燕,刘炯宇.中国两栖动物受威胁现状评估.生物多样性,2016,24(5):588- 597.
    [45] 费梁,叶昌媛,江建平.中国两栖动物及其分布彩色图鉴.四川科学技术出版社,2012.
    [46] 卜荣平.猫儿山小鲵(Hynobius maoershanensis)繁殖行为和繁殖期生境选择研究[D].桂林:广西师范大学,2017.
    [47] 武正军,戴冬亮,宁加佳,黄乘明,于海.广东罗坑自然保护区鳄蜥生境选择的季节性差异.生态学报,2012,32(15):4691- 4699.
    [48] 石玉帛.崇明地区无尾两栖类现状分析[D].上海:华东师范大学,2018.
    [49] Pilliod D S,Peterson C R.Local and landscape effects of introduced trout on amphibians in historically fishless watersheds.Ecosystems,2001,4(4):322- 333.
    [50] 张迎梅,阮禄章,董元华,龚钟明,李运东,王辉,Mauro F.无锡太湖地区夜鹭及白鹭繁殖生物学研究.动物学研究,2000,21(4):275- 278.
    [51] Alford R A,Richards S J.Global amphibian declines:a problem in applied ecology.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1999,30:133- 165.
    [52] 余志伟,邓其祥,吴毅,周材权,李操,陈秀眉,苏舟,陈德川,刘继东.二滩水电站的兴建对陆生脊椎动物的影响及对策.四川师范学院学报:自然科学版,1998,19(1):129- 134.
    [53] Karsen S J,Lau M W N,Bogadek A.Hong Kong Amphibians and Reptiles.2nd ed.Hong Kong,China:Provisional Urban Council,1998.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700