Repatriation to referral hospital after reperfusion of STEMI patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights of a Canadian regional STEMI care system

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Rudee Ting ; MBBS^a ; Ambika Tejpal^a ; Laura Finken ; MSc^a ; Mark Fisher ; MD^b ; Charles Lefkowitz ; MD^c ; Harikrishnan Parthasarathy ; MBBS ; MD^a ; Brooks Fallis ; MD^a ; Emil L. Fosbol ; MD ; PhD^d ; Mohammad Al-Shehri ; MD^a ; Michael Kutryk ; MD ; PhD^a ; Christopher E. Buller ; MD^a ; Neil Fam ; MD ; MSc^a ; John J. Graham ; MD^a ; Asim N. Cheema ; MD ; PhD^a ; Akshay Bagai ; MD ; MHS^a ; ^{bagaia@smh.ca" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author}
• 刊名：American Heart Journal
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：July 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：177
• 期：Complete
• 页码：145-152
• 全文大小：219 K

文摘

In regional systems of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care, patients presenting to hospitals without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are transferred to PCI-capable hospitals for primary PCI. Repatriation, a practice whereby such patients are transferred back to non-PCI referral hospitals after reperfusion is prevalent in many jurisdictions, yet little is known of this practice and its safety.

Methods

We studied 979 consecutive STEMI patients transported from the emergency department and catchment area of two non-PCI hospitals in Ontario, Canada to a regional PCI-hospital for primary PCI between January 2008 and June 2014. Logistic regression modeling was performed to determine factors associated with delayed repatriation beyond 24 hours and to evaluate the association between repatriation and index-admission mortality.

Results

Eight hundred and fifteen (83.2%) patients were repatriated with 524 (65.2%) patients repatriated within 24 hours. Factors independently associated with delayed repatriation included systolic blood pressure (OR 1.03 per 5 mmHg decrease, 95% CI 1.01-1.06, P= .04), requirement for mechanical ventilation (OR 24.9, 95% CI 5.4-115.3, P< .0001), ventricular arrhythmia (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.3-6.6, P= .01), infarct-related artery (P= .03), final TIMI flow grade (P= .01) and access-site complications (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.04-5.4, P= .04). After repatriation, 9 (1.3%) patients returned to the PCI-hospital for urgent care, and 16 (2.0%) died during index-admission. After adjustment, repatriation was not associated with increase in index-admission mortality (adjusted OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.16-1.32, P= .15).

Conclusions

In a regional STEMI care system in Ontario, Canada, patients are routinely repatriated to non-PCI hospitals after primary PCI. This practice was associated with very low and acceptable rate of return to the PCI-hospital during index-admission without an adverse impact on short-term outcomes.