拟动力试验的位移控制技术及误差分析

详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文

英文篇名：Displacement control technique for pseudo-dynamic test and error analysis 中文刊名：哈尔滨工业大学学报 英文刊名：Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology 作者：李玉顺 ; 沈世钊 英文作者：LI Yu-shun1 ; SHEN Shi-zhao2(1.Faculty of Architectural Civil Engineering and Enviroment ; Ningbo University ; Ningbo 315211 ; China ; 2.School of Civil Engineering ; Harbin Institute of Technology ; Harbin 150090 ; China) 中文关键词：拟动力试验 ; 位移控制 ; 下冲误差 ; 过冲误差 英文关键词：pseudo-dynamic test ; displacement control ; undershooting error ; overshooting error 出版日期：2007-06-15 机构：宁波大学建筑工程与环境学院,哈尔滨工业大学土木工程学院 浙江宁波315211,哈尔滨150090 年：2007 期：06 出版单位：哈尔滨工业大学学报

摘要

介绍了拟动力试验的几种位移控制方法,并对位移控制过程中产生的误差进行了分析.位移控制误差有下冲误差和过冲误差之分,对拟动力试验过程中的下冲误差和过冲误差的产生机理及各自对弹性体系的不同影响进行了探讨.分析结果表明,下冲误差减少系统阻尼,增加系统能量,使结构的地震反应增大;而过冲误差则相反.另外,弹性体系试验精度对位移控制误差的敏感程度明显高于弹塑性体系,并通过对某一地震观测用的结构输入其实测地震波所进行的拟动力试验结果得到了验证.
Some displacement control methods were presented,and the error caused by displacement control was analyzed.There are undershooting and overshooting errors in displacement control error.The development mechanisms of undershooting and overshooting errors and their differential effects on elastic systems were investigated.It was found out that the undershooting error reduces system damping,increases system energy and seismic response,on the other hand the overshooting error has the opposite action.In addition,elastic system is more sensitive than inelastic system in displacement control error that affecting the testing accuracy,which was demonstrated by the pseudo-tests based on a frame model that was constructed for earthquake monitoring,and used the recorded earthquake inputs.

引文

[1]高梨晃一,大井謙一,高小航.鉄骨造建物の地震?答観測(その1)[J].日本建築学会大会学術講演梗概集.関東,1984:1407-1408.
    [2]大井謙一,林(光,高梨晃一.曲げせんだん型鉄骨柔架構のための部分構造オンライン実験スキ?ム[J].日本建築学会構造系論文集.2001,540(2):49-55.
    [3]李玉顺,大井谦一,沈世钊.极低屈服点软钢阻尼器恢复力模型的研究[J].地震工程与工程振动.2004,24(6):142-145.
    [4]李玉顺,大井谦一,沈世钊.钢框架结构软钢阻尼器振动控制的试验及理论研究[J].建筑结构学报,2004,25(2):1-7.