北京金融街F7/9大厦空间张弦梁结构设计研究
|
摘要
以北京金融街F7/9工程中厅空间张弦梁结构为分析实例,重点分析结构矢跨比、预应力度对结构静力性能、整体稳定性能的影响,分析表明矢跨比对结构稳定性能和结构位移影响较大,而预应力度影响较小,且随着矢跨比增大,整体稳定对预应力敏感度降低。四种不同计算模型对比分析表明,屋面檩条的存在与否及其连接刚度对整体稳定具有显著影响,檩条和交叉索的设置大大提高了结构整体稳定性。最后通过罕遇地震作用下弹塑性时程分析,得出了结构体系在大震下的响应特性。
For the spatial beam string structure of Beijing Finance Center F7/9,the impact of the ratio of rise to span and the pre-stressing ratio on the structural static behavior and the structural overall stability is analyzed.The results show that the ratio of rise to span has an apparent impact of the structural overall stability and the structural displacement,while the prestressing ratio plays few impact.As the ratio of rise to span increases,the sensibility of the prestressing ratio on the overall stability drops.The existence of the purlin and its connection rigidity take an explicit effect on the overall stability,and the arrangement of the purlin and the diagonal cable largely raises the overall stability,by analyzing and comparing four different calculation models.The structural seismic response performance under rare earthquake is obtained by the elastic-plastic time-history analysis.
For the spatial beam string structure of Beijing Finance Center F7/9,the impact of the ratio of rise to span and the pre-stressing ratio on the structural static behavior and the structural overall stability is analyzed.The results show that the ratio of rise to span has an apparent impact of the structural overall stability and the structural displacement,while the prestressing ratio plays few impact.As the ratio of rise to span increases,the sensibility of the prestressing ratio on the overall stability drops.The existence of the purlin and its connection rigidity take an explicit effect on the overall stability,and the arrangement of the purlin and the diagonal cable largely raises the overall stability,by analyzing and comparing four different calculation models.The structural seismic response performance under rare earthquake is obtained by the elastic-plastic time-history analysis.
引文
[1]葛家琪,张国军,等.2008奥运会大跨度钢结构整体稳定性能分析研究[J].建筑结构学报,2007(6):22-30.
[2]葛家琪,王树,等.河南艺术中心艺术墙共享大厅结构体系稳定性分析[J].建筑结构,2008,38(12):11-13.
[3]沈士钊,陈昕.网壳结构稳定性[M].北京:科学出版社,1999.
[4]JGJ61—2003网壳结构技术规程[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2003.
[5]GB50017—2003钢结构设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2003.
[6]GB50011—2001建筑抗震设计规范(2008版)[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2008.
[7]陈绍蕃.钢结构设计原理[M].北京:科学出版社,2001.
[8]JGJ 102—2003玻璃幕墙工程技术规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2003.
[9]谢礼立,翟长海.最不利设计地震动研究[J].地震学报,2003,25(3):250-261.
[2]葛家琪,王树,等.河南艺术中心艺术墙共享大厅结构体系稳定性分析[J].建筑结构,2008,38(12):11-13.
[3]沈士钊,陈昕.网壳结构稳定性[M].北京:科学出版社,1999.
[4]JGJ61—2003网壳结构技术规程[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2003.
[5]GB50017—2003钢结构设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2003.
[6]GB50011—2001建筑抗震设计规范(2008版)[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2008.
[7]陈绍蕃.钢结构设计原理[M].北京:科学出版社,2001.
[8]JGJ 102—2003玻璃幕墙工程技术规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2003.
[9]谢礼立,翟长海.最不利设计地震动研究[J].地震学报,2003,25(3):250-261.
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心