双江口水电站坝体材料及覆盖层坝基动力变形特性研究
|
摘要
筑坝材料的动力变形特性是进行大坝动力反应分析的基本依据之一,采用等效粘弹性模型计算时主要包括最大动剪模量Gmax与平均有效主应力的关系,动剪模量比G/Gmax与动剪应变幅γd的关系以及阻尼比λ与动剪应变幅γd的关系等。这些关系反映了在动荷载作用下土的应力应变关系的非线性与粘滞性特征。双江口水电站坝体材料及覆盖层坝基动力特性试验由两种试验方法同时进行,本文通过对比综合两种方法的试验参数。结果表明两种方法在不同的动应变区间有差异,应根据不同的计算模型选择使用。
The dynamic deformation characteristics of dam materials is one of the bases of analyzing the dynamic response of the dam.The calculation with equivalent viscoelastic model includes the relationships between the maximum dynamic shear modulus Gmax and average effective principal stress,between the dynamic shear modulus ratio G/Gmax and dynamic shear strain amplitude γd,between the damping ratio λ and dynamic shear strain amplitude γd and so on.These relationships reflect the nonlinear and viscous characteristics of stress-strain relationship of the soil under dynamic loading.The tests of dynamic deformation characteristics of the dam materials of Shuangjiangkou Hydropower Station are conducted by using two test methods at the same time.The parameters of the two test methods are compared here,the results show that the dynamic strain area is different in these two methods,which should be chosen based on different calculation models.
The dynamic deformation characteristics of dam materials is one of the bases of analyzing the dynamic response of the dam.The calculation with equivalent viscoelastic model includes the relationships between the maximum dynamic shear modulus Gmax and average effective principal stress,between the dynamic shear modulus ratio G/Gmax and dynamic shear strain amplitude γd,between the damping ratio λ and dynamic shear strain amplitude γd and so on.These relationships reflect the nonlinear and viscous characteristics of stress-strain relationship of the soil under dynamic loading.The tests of dynamic deformation characteristics of the dam materials of Shuangjiangkou Hydropower Station are conducted by using two test methods at the same time.The parameters of the two test methods are compared here,the results show that the dynamic strain area is different in these two methods,which should be chosen based on different calculation models.
引文
[1]刘胜群,陈玉平.饱和软粘土动力特性试验研究[J].铁道建筑,2006,(10):68-70.
[2]周健,屠洪权,安原一哉.动力荷载作用下软粘土的残余变形计算模式[J].岩土力学,1996,17(1):54-58.
[3]何昌荣.动模量和阻尼的动三轴试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,1997,19(2):39-48.
[4]叶银灿,来向华.杭州湾粉质土动强度特性研究[J].海洋科学,2003,23(3):56-58.
[5]黎冰,高玉峰,刘汉龙,等.几个影响室内土动力试验的重要试验参数[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2005,25(4):446-449.
[6]王皆伟,王汝恒.土动力本构模型初探[J].四川建筑科学研究,2005,31(5):84-88.
[7]刘汉龙,余湘娟.土动力学与岩土地震工程研究进展[J].河海大学学报,1999,27(1):6-15.
[8]张建民,王稳祥.振动频率对饱和砂土动力特性的影响[J].岩土工程学报,1990,12(2):92-95.
[9]张文举,何昌荣.宽级配泥石流砾石土的动强度试验研究[J].四川水力发电,2003,22(1):66-68.
[10]张禾.黄泛冲积平原土料的动力试验参数研究[J].人民黄河,2008,30(6):83-84.
[11]朱百里,沈珠江.计算土力学[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1990.
[2]周健,屠洪权,安原一哉.动力荷载作用下软粘土的残余变形计算模式[J].岩土力学,1996,17(1):54-58.
[3]何昌荣.动模量和阻尼的动三轴试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,1997,19(2):39-48.
[4]叶银灿,来向华.杭州湾粉质土动强度特性研究[J].海洋科学,2003,23(3):56-58.
[5]黎冰,高玉峰,刘汉龙,等.几个影响室内土动力试验的重要试验参数[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2005,25(4):446-449.
[6]王皆伟,王汝恒.土动力本构模型初探[J].四川建筑科学研究,2005,31(5):84-88.
[7]刘汉龙,余湘娟.土动力学与岩土地震工程研究进展[J].河海大学学报,1999,27(1):6-15.
[8]张建民,王稳祥.振动频率对饱和砂土动力特性的影响[J].岩土工程学报,1990,12(2):92-95.
[9]张文举,何昌荣.宽级配泥石流砾石土的动强度试验研究[J].四川水力发电,2003,22(1):66-68.
[10]张禾.黄泛冲积平原土料的动力试验参数研究[J].人民黄河,2008,30(6):83-84.
[11]朱百里,沈珠江.计算土力学[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1990.
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心