弹性与非线性状态下层状岩石高温热应力场数值对比分析
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
在考虑层状岩石热力学参数随温度变化以及温度作用下岩石的热弹塑性本构方程的基础下,利用有限元软件ANSYS对煤炭地下气化高温作用下煤层顶底板的温度场和应力场进行了研究,对比了弹性状态和弹塑性状态下的岩石的应力场分布情况。通过对比分析发现,当温度达到300℃以上时,线弹性状态与弹塑性状态下得到热应力之间的误差为30%,1000℃以上误差接近100%。这充分说明在高温情况下不能忽略岩石的非线性特性,否则温度的升高会使地下工程中岩石计算应力与实际情况产生很大差异。
Considering the variation of thermodynamic parameters of stratified rock with variation of temperature and its thermo-elastic-plastic constitutive equation,the finite element analysis software ANSYS was used to study the temperature field and stress field in coal seam roof and floor under high temperature caused by underground coal gasification.The stress fields in the stratified rock under elastic state and elastic-plastic state were compared.By comparative analysis,it was found that,the deviation of the stress fields in the two states was 30%when the temperature reached 300℃ over,the deviation approached 100%when the temperature reached 1000℃ over.This showed that the nonlinear character of rock under high temperature is not to be ignored,otherwise the calculated result of rock stress is quite different from actual situation because of a rise in temperature.
引文
[1]刘淑琴,梁杰,余力.煤炭地下气化中CO2化学反应特性及影响因素[J].中国矿业大学学报,2000,29(6):606-609.
    [2]杨兰和,梁杰.煤炭地下气化燃空区范围TEM勘测方法[J]南京理工大学学报,2001,25(2):200-204.
    [3]王在泉,华安增.煤炭地下气化空间扩展规律及控制方法研究综述[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2001,20(3):379-381.
    [4]Zhou Hongwei,Xie Heping,Zuo Jianping.Developments in re-searches on mechanical behaviors of rocks under the confining ofhigh ground pressure in the depths[J].Advances in Mechanics,2005,35(1):91-99.
    [5]章熙民.传热学[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1998.
    [6]康健,梁冰.随机介质热弹性力学模型球坐标问题的解析解[J].水文地质工程地质,2005,(6).
    [7]蔡美峰.岩石力学与工程[M].北京:科学出版社,2005.
    [8]贺永德.现代煤化技术手册[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2002.
    [9]林睦曾.岩石热物理学及其工程应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2000.
    [10]安欧.构造应力场[M].北京:地震出版社,1992.
    [11]王忠昶.矿井底板岩层阻水性能的研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2003.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心