《建筑抗震设计规范》(GB50011-2010)中液化判别公式改进思路解析

英文篇名：Improvement of liquefaction criterion in Code for Seismic Design of Buildings(GB50011-2010)
中文刊名：工程勘察
英文刊名：Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying
作者：韩铮
英文作者：Han Zheng(BGI Engineering Consultants LTD. ; Beijing 100038 ; China)
中文关键词：液化判别概率法 ; 人工网络模型 ; 可靠度理论 ; 规范对比
英文关键词：liquefaction probability method ; artificial neural network(ANN) ; reliability theory ; specification comparison
出版日期：2011-06-01
机构：北京市勘察设计研究院有限公司;
年：2011
期：06
出版单位：工程勘察

摘要

本文通过对近年来国内外地震砂土液化判别概率方法的发展介绍,阐明了《建筑抗震设计规范》(GB50011-2001)中的液化判别公式需要改进的主要问题;并着重分析介绍了《建筑抗震设计规范》(GB50011-2010)建立液化判别公式中所采用的人工网络模型、可靠度理论等新思路和新方法;进而通过对2010版规范与2001版规范液化判别公式的计算对比,分析说明了2001版规范液化公式无论形式上还是理论深度上,在与2001版规范保持最大限度的一致性和延续性的同时,也进行了更为科学、合理的改进,保证了国家标准的前瞻性、科学性和权威性。
Based on the introduction about the development of probabilistic methods for soil liquefaction evaluation in recent years at home and abroad,the paper explains the main problems existing in the liquefaction formula of Code for Seismic Design of Buildings(GB50011-2001).And it emphatically analyzes the ANN model and reliability theory applied in Code for Seismic Design of Buildings(GB50011-2010).Through the comparison,it can be found that the formula of 2010 version not only maintains consistency and continuity with 2001 version as far as possible,regardless of in form or in depth,but also makes some more scientific and reasonable improvements.As a result,it ensures that the national standard keeps its foresight,scientificity,and authority.

引文

[1]Seed H B,Tokimatsu H,Harder L F,Chung R M.Influence ofSPT procedure in seismic liquefaction resistance evaluations[J].J.Geotech.Engrg.,ASCE.1985,111(12):1425～1445.
    [2]Liao S C,Veneziano D,Whitman R V.Regression models forevaluating liquefaction probability[J].J.Geotech.Engrg.,ASCE.1988,114(4):389～411.
    [3]Juang C H,Rosowsky D V,Tang W H.Reliability-basedmethod for assessing liquefaction potential of soils[J].J.Geotech.Engrg.,ASCE.1999,125(8):684～689.
    [4]Juang C H,Chen J,Tao J,Andrus R D.Risk-basedliquefaction potential evaluation using standard penetration tests[J].J.Can.Geotech.2000,37(6):1195～1208.
    [5]Juang C H,Chen C J,.Jiang T.Probabilistic framwork forliquefaction potential by shear wave velocity[J].J.Geotech.Engrg.,ASCE.2001,127(8):670～678.
    [6]Juang C H,Yuan H,Lee D H,Lin P S.Simplified conepenetration test-based method for evaluating liquefaction resistance of soils[J].J.Geotech.Engrg.,ASCE.2003,129(1):66～80.
    [7]Cetin K O,Seed R B.Standard penetration test-basedprohabillstic and deterministic assessment of seismic soilliquefaction pomtial[J].J.Geotech.Geoenviron.Eng.,ASCE,2004,130(12):1314～1340.
    [8]符圣聪,江静贝.从卫民.液化势的概率估计和判别标准[J].建筑科学,2004,20(5):49～55.
    [9]符圣聪,江静贝.关于建立新的液化判别标准的建议[J].工程抗震与加固改造,2005,27(2):61～66.
    [10]符圣聪,江静贝,从卫民.地震时饱和砂土的失效概率[J].工程抗震与加固改造,2004,26(6):51～57.
    [11]中华人民共和国国家标准.建筑抗震设计规范(GB50011-2001)[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001.
    [12]中华人民共和国国家标准.建筑抗震设计规范(GB50011-2010)[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
    [13]陈祥光,裴旭东.人工神经网络技术及应用[M].北京:中国电力出版社,2003.
    [14]符圣聪,江静贝.简化的液化概率判别法[J].工程抗震与加固改造,2008,30(3):93～98.