钢管混凝土减震框架与钢管混凝土框架-剪力墙结构的对比试验研究
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
设计两榀比例为1:4、梁柱构件尺寸相同的试件:一榀为设置新型三重钢管防屈曲支撑的钢管混凝土减震框架,一榀为普通钢管混凝土框架-剪力墙结构。对两个试件进行反复荷载作用下的抗震性能试验,对比分析两种结构的破坏特征、滞回性能、骨架曲线、强度和刚度退化、耗能能力和关键点应变等抗震性能指标。试验结果表明:钢管混凝土减震框架结构具有与钢管混凝土框架-剪力墙结构相当的承载力,并在变形能力、延性和耗能能力等方面均有明显的提高,对刚度退化和强度退化也有明显的缓解,具有更合理的受力性能和破坏机制,新型三重钢管防屈曲支撑起到良好的耗能减震作用,有效地改善钢管混凝土框架的抗震性能。
Two specimens with the same scale of about 1/4 and the same dimension of beam-column were designed.One specimen is a concrete filled steel tube(CFST) frame structure with new triple-steel tube buckling-resistant brace(BRB),and the other specimen is a CFST frame-RC shear wall structure.The seismic behavior of the specimens was studied by testing under combined axial constant compression and lateral cyclic load.The failure characteristics,hysteretic behavior,skeleton curve,strength degradation,stiffness degradation,energy dissipation capacity and strain of these two structures were analyzed.The results shows that the CFST frame with BRB has the same excellent bearing capacity as the CFST frame-RC shear wall structure,and the CFST frame structure with BRB was significantly improved in the aspects of deformation capacity,ductility and energy dissipation,with the strength and stiffness degradation reduced.The CFST frame with BRB has more reasonable mechanical behavior and failure mode.The seismic performance of the CFST frame structure was effectively improved by the new triple-steel tube BRB.
引文
[1]钟善桐.钢管混凝土统一理论:应用与研究[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2006
    [2]钟善桐.高层钢-混凝土组合结构[M].广州:华南理工大学出版社,2003
    [3]韩林海,陶忠,王文达.现代组合结构和混合结构——试验、理论和方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2009(HanLinhai,Tao Zhong,Wang Wenda.Advanced compositeand mixed structures—testing,theory and design approach[M].Beijing:Science Press,2009(in Chinese))
    [4]Kim Y J,Kim M H,Jung I Y,et al.Experimentalinvestigation of the cyclic behavior of nodes in diagridstructures[J].Engineering Structures,2011,33(7):2134-2144
    [5]Bradford M A,Pi Y L,Qu W L.Time-dependent in-planebehaviour and buckling of concrete-filled steel tubulararches[J].Engineering Structures,2011,33(5):1781-1795
    [6]童根树,米旭峰.钢支撑设计方法对多层框架实际抗震性能的影响[J].工程力学,2008,25(6):107-115(Tong Genshu,Mi Xufeng.Aseismic behavior of multistoryframes based on different braces design methods[J].Engineering Mechanics,2008,25(6):107-115(inChinese))
    [7]Astanch-Ash A,Zhao Q H.Cyclic behavior of steel shearwall systems[C]//Proceedings of 2002 Annual StabilityConference.Seattle:Structural Stability Research Council,2002
    [8]Liao F Y,Han L H,Tao Z.Seismic behaviour of circularCFST columns and RC shear wall mixed structures:experiments[J].Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2009,65(8):1582-1596
    [9]GB50011—2010建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010(GB50011—2010Code for seismicdesign of buildings[S].Beijing:China Architecture&Building Press,2010(in Chinese))
    [10]中国建筑标准设计研究院.建筑结构消能减震(振)设计[M].北京:中国计划出版社,2009
    [11]邓雪松,邹征敏,周云.开槽式三重钢管防屈曲耗能支撑试验研究与有限元模拟[J].土木工程学报,2010,43(12):41-49(Deng Xuesong,Zou Zhengmin,Zhou Yun.Experimental and finite-element studies of notched triple-steel tube buckling-resistant brace[J].China CivilEngineering Journal,2010,43(12):41-49(in Chinese))
    [12]JGJ101—1996建筑抗震试验方法规程[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1997(JGJ101—1996Specification oftesting methods for earthquake resistant building[S].Beijing:China Architecture&Building Press,1997(inChinese))
    [13]朱伯龙.结构抗震试验[M].北京:地震出版社,1989

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心