Pushover分析中侧向力分布模式对结果的影响

英文篇名：The Influences of Lateral Load Patterns on Result of Pushover Analysis
中文刊名：佳木斯大学学报(自然科学版)
英文刊名：Journal of Jiamusi University(Natural Science Edition)
作者：席攀 ; 沈之容
英文作者：XI Pan ; SHEN Zhi-rong(Department of Building Engineering ; Tongji University ; Shanghai 200092 ; China)
中文关键词：框架结构 ; 侧向力 ; 静力弹塑性 ; 塑性铰
英文关键词：frame structures ; lateral load ; pushover ; plastic hinge
出版日期：2013-03-15
机构：同济大学建筑工程系;
年：2013
期：02
出版单位：佳木斯大学学报(自然科学版)

摘要

在框架结构的静力弹塑性分析中,侧向力分布模式对其结果有一定的影响.本文以三种不同高度的钢筋混凝土框架结构为研究对象,采用三种常见的侧向力加载模式进行静力弹塑性分析,对其基底剪力、位移和塑性铰分布进行了对比.结果表明:随着结构高度增加,结构的高阶振型对性能点位移影响加大,且倒三角分布模式下塑性铰开展要快于其它两种分布力模式.
The lateral load patterns have some influences on the results of Pushover analysis for frame structures.In this paper,three lateral load patterns were applied to three reinforced concrete frame structures of different height.The results,including base shear,displacement and plastic hinges distribution,were compared.It is demonstrated that the influences of higher modes on the displacement increases with the structural height and plastic hinges develop more quickly under the inverted triangular distribution mode.

引文

[1]ATC-40.Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings[R].Applied Technology Council,Red Wood City,California,1996.
    [2]FEMA-273.NEHRP Commentary on the Guidelines for theSeismic Rehabilitation of Buildings[R].Washington D C.:Federal Emergency Management Agency,1996.
    [3]Krawinklar H,Seneviratna G D P K.Pros and Cons of a Push-over Analysis of Seismic Performance Evaluation[J].EngineeringStrctures,1998,20:452-464.
    [4]陆新征,叶列平,缪志伟,等.建筑抗震弹塑性分析—原理、模型与在ABAQUS,MSC.MARC和SAP2000上的实践[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2009.
    [5]侯爽,欧进萍.结构Pushover分析的侧向力分布及高阶振型影响[J].地震工程与工程振动,2004,24(3):89-97.
    [6]北京金土木软件技术有限公司.ETABS中文版使用指南[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2004.
    [7]熊向阳,戚震华.侧向荷载分布方式对静力弹塑性分析结果的影响[J].建筑科学,2001,17(5):8-13.