包头现代中学教学楼框架抗连续倒塌分析

英文篇名：Analysis on the progressive collapse resistance of a RC-frame teaching building in Baotou
中文刊名：内蒙古科技大学学报
英文刊名：Journal of Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology
作者：郝润霞 ; 赵锦绣 ; 刘英达
英文作者：ZHAO Jin-xiu ; HAO Run-xia ; LIU Ying-da ; Architecture and Civil Engineering School ; Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology ; Baotou Architectural Design Institute Co. ; Ltd.
中文关键词：钢筋混凝土框架结构 ; 抗连续性倒塌 ; 线性静力拆除构件法
英文关键词：Reinforced concrete frame structure ; progressive collapse resistance ; Linear static demolition component method
出版日期：2015-03-15
机构：内蒙古科技大学建筑与土木工程学院;包头市建筑设计研究院有限责任公司;
年：2015
期：01
出版单位：内蒙古科技大学学报

摘要

本文分别根据GSA(General Services Administration)2003规范和我国《高层建筑混凝土结构技术规程》JGJ3-2010规范下的线性静力拆除构件分析方法对包头市某框架结构教学楼进行了抗连续倒塌对比分析,由于两种方法的加载模式和评估指标均不相同,所以不能由理论计算比较两种方法的分析结果.本文通过具体对一栋结构的抗连续性倒塌分析得到:我国规范的线性拆除构件法对结构的抗连续性倒塌分析要比GSA规范下的分析方法得到的结果更保守.
The continuous collapse resistance of a frame structure in Baotou was analyzed using the linear static demolition component methods according to the GSA(General Services Administration) 2003 specification and the Technical specification for concrete structures of tall building JGJ3-2010 specification in our country.Due to the difference in the load model and the evaluation index between the two methods,the results of the analysis with the two methods should not be compared by theoretical calculation.Through analyzing the progressive collapse resistance of a concrete structure,the conclusion is drawn that the linear static demolition component method of China for the analysis result of resisting progressive collapse is more conservative than the analytical method based on GSA specification.

引文

[1]JGJ3-2010,高层建筑混凝土结构技术规程[S].
    [2]Progressive collapse analysis and design guidelines for new federal office buildings and major modernization Projects.U.S.General Service Administration[S].
    [3]张鹏,陈宝旭.基于GSA指南的RC框架抗连续倒塌的线性静力分析[J].四川建筑科学研究,2014,21(12):2-5.
    [4]叶列平,曲哲,陆新征,等.提高建筑结构抗地震倒塌能力的设计思想与方法[J].建筑结构学报,2008,29(4):42-50.