储层条件下致密砂岩动静态弹性力学参数实验研究
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
岩石动、静态弹性参数之间存在差异,开展储层条件下岩石动、静态弹性参数实验,确定动、静态弹性参数转换关系,对储层压裂改造有重要的实际意义。利用NER公司的Auto Lab 1500对苏里格气田致密砂岩进行模拟储层条件(包括地层温度、压力)下的岩石力学性质测试。结果表明:(1)同一批岩样,相同测量条件下测量得到的动态杨氏模量大于静态杨氏模量,且动态杨氏模量与静态杨氏模量有较好的线性关系,动态泊松比大于静态泊松比,但无明显相关性。(2)同一块岩芯,纵、横波速度随围压增大而增大,随温度升高而减小;动、静态杨氏模量随压力的增大而增大,动态杨氏模量随温度增大而减小,静态杨氏模量随温度升高而增大;动态泊松比随围压增大而减小,随温度升高略微减小,静态泊松比随围压增大而增大,随温度升高减小明显。对产生这种现象的机制进行分析,并确定在不同温度、压力条件下动、静态弹性参数之间的转换关系,为苏里格地区致密砂岩储层地层条件下岩石力学性质的研究提供了基本参数,对制定油气层的压裂施工方案提供参考依据。
Differences existed in dynamic and static elastic parameters. In order to obtain the transformation functions between dynamic and static elastic parameters,experiments were done under reservoir conditions,which had important practical significance for fracturing in reservoirs. Rock mechanical properties of tight sandstones under reservoir conditions(including formation temperature and pressure) in Sulige gas field were obtained using the Auto Lab 1500 machine made by the New England Research Company. The results demonstrated that dynamic Young's modulus was greater than the static Young's modulus,and there was a liner relationship between them in the same core samples under the same experimental conditions. The dynamic Poisson's ratio was higher than the static Poisson's ratio,but there was no obvious relationship between them. The compressional velocity and shear velocity would both increase when confining pressure increases or temperature decreases in one core sample. The dynamic Young's modulus of one core sample would increase when confining pressure increases or temperature decreases. However,the static Young's modulus of one core sample would increase when confining pressure increases or temperature increases. The dynamic Poisson's ratio of one core sample would decrease but the static one would increase when confining pressure increases. The dynamic Poisson's ratio of one core sample would decrease but the static one would decrease obviously when temperature increases. The mechanism for this phenomenon was analyzed,and the transformation functions between the dynamic and static elastic parameters under different temperature or pressure were obtained. Basic parameters were offered for rock mechanical property researches under reservoir conditions in tight sandstones in Sulige gas field,which provide foundation for the development of oil layer fracturing program.
引文
[1]张浩,康毅力,陈景山,等.变围压条件下致密砂岩力学性质实验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(增2):4 227–4 231.(ZHANG Hao,KANG Yili,CHEN Jingshan,et al.Experimental study on mechanical properties of dense sandstone under different cinfining pressures[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2007,26(Supp.2):4 227–4 231.(in Chinese))
    [2]葛洪魁,黄荣樽,庄锦江,等.三轴应力下饱和水砂岩动静态弹性参数的试验研究[J].石油大学学报,1994,18(3):41–47.(GE Hongkui,HUANG Rongzun,ZHANG Jinjiang,et al.Experimental study on dynamic and static elastic parameters of water-saturated sands under triaxial stresses[J].Journal of the University of Petroleum,1994,18(3):41–47.(in Chinese))
    [3]林英松,葛洪魁,王顺昌.岩石动静力学参数的试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1998,17(2):216–222.(LIN Yingsong,GE Hongkui,WANG Shunchang.Testing study on dynamic and static elastic parametersof rocks[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,1998,17(2):216–222.(in Chinese))
    [4]王振涛,董月昌,王玉梅.孤南地区浅层稠油弹性参数敏感性分析及应用[J].石油物探,2014,53(3):360–366.(WANG Zhentao,DONG Yuechang,WANG Yumei.Sensitivity analyis of elastic paraeter for heavy oil reservoir and its application in Gunan area[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum,2014,53(3):360–366.(in Chinese))
    [5]刘江平,罗银河,张英德.黏土动、静弹性模量相关性试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(2):427–432.(LIU Jiangping,LUO Yinhe,ZHANG Yingde.Test research on relativity between dynamic and static elastic modulus of clay[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2007,26(2):427–432.(in Chinese))
    [6]王少鹤.利用阵列声波测井资料预测静态压裂参数[J].测井技术,2011,35(3):270–274.(WANG Shaohe.On static fracturing parameters prediction with multiple array log data[J].Well Logging Technology,2011,35(3):270–274.(in Chinese))
    [7]ZISMAN W A.Comparison of the statically and seismologically determined elastic constants of rocks[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,1933,19(7):680–686.
    [8]WARPINSKI N R,PETERSON R E,BRANAGAN P T,et al.In situ stress and moduli:comparison of values derived from multiple techniques[C]//SPE Annual Technical Conference.New Orleans:ETATS-UNIS,1998:569–583.
    [9]葛洪魁,陈颙,林英松.岩石动态与静态弹性参数差别的微观机理[J].石油大学学报,2001,25(4):34–36.(GE Hongkui,CHEN Yong,LIN Yingsong.Microscopic mechanism of difference between static and dynamic elastic parameters of rock[J].Journal of the University of Petroleum,2001,25(4):34–36.(in Chinese))
    [10]席道瑛,谢端,易良坤,等.温度对岩石模量和波速的影响[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1998,17(增):802–807.(XI Daoying,XIE Duan,YI Liangkun,et al.Effects of temperature on rock’s modulus and wave velocity[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,1998,17(Supp.):802–807.(in Chinese))
    [11]云美厚,管志宁.储层条件下砂岩纵波和横波速度的理论计算[J].石油物探,2002,41(3):289–292.(YUN Meihou,GUAN Zhining.The estimation of P and S-wave velocities in sandstone under in-situ conditions[J].Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum,2002,41(3):289–292.(in Chinese))
    [12]GREGORY A R.Shear wave velocity measurements of sedimentary rock samples under compression[J].Rock Mechanics,1963:439–471.
    [13]JIZBA D,NUR A.Static and dynamic moduli of tight gas sandstones and their relation to formation properties[C]//SPWLA 31st Annual Logging Symposium.Lafayette,Louisiana:[s.n.],1990:1–21.
    [14]WINKLER K W,NUR A.Friction and seismic attenuation in rocks[J].Nature,1979,277:528–531.
    [15]WINKLER K W,NUR A.Seismic attenuation:effects of pore fluids and frictional-sliding[J].Geophysics,1982,47(1):1–15.
    [16]DVORKIN J,NUR A.Dynamic poroelasticity:a unified model with the squirt and the Biot mechanisms[J].Geophysics,1993,58(4):524–533.
    [17]ASHBY M F.The failure of brittle solids containing small cracks under compressive stress states[J].Acta Metallurgica,1986,34(3):497–510.
    [18]杨秀娟,张敏,闫相祯.基于声波测井信息的岩石弹性力学参数研究[J].石油地质与工程,2008,22(4):39–42.(YANG Xiujuan,ZHANG Min,YAN Xiangzhen.Study on acoustic logging-based rock elasticity parameters[J].Petroleum Geology and Engineering,2008,22(4):39–42.(in Chinese))
    [19]GORDON R B,DAVIS L A.Velocity and attenuation of seismic waves in imperfectly elastic rock[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1968,73(12):3 917–3 935.
    [20]KERN H.P-and S-wave velocities in crustal and mantle rocks under the simultaneous action of high confining pressure and high temperature and the effect of the rock microstructure[C]//Highpressure Researches in Geoscience.Stuttgart:Schweizerbartsche Verlafsbuchhandlung,1982:15–45.
    [21]杨秀娟,张敏,闫相祯.基于声波测井信息的岩石弹性力学参数研究[J].石油地质与工程,2008,22(4):39–42.(YANG Xiujuan,ZHANG Min,YAN Xianzhen.Study on acoustic logging-based rock elasticity parameters[J].Petroleum Geology and Engineering,2008,22(4):39–42.(in Chinese))
    [22]葛洪魁.多相岩石弹性特征的试验研究及其在地层评价中的一些应用[博士学位论文][D].北京:中国地震局地球物理研究所,2000.(GE Hongkui.Experimental study of muliphase rock elastic behavior and some application to formation evaluation[Ph.D.Thesis][D].Beijing:Institute of Geophysics,China Earthquake Administration,2000.(in Chinese))
    [23]李智武,罗玉宏,刘树根,等.川东北地区地层条件下致密储层力学性质实验分析[J].矿物岩石,2006,25(4):52–60.(LI Zhiwu,LUO Yuhong,LIU Shugen,et al.The experimental analysis of mechanical properties of compact reservoir rock under formation conditions,northeast of Sichuan Basin,China[J].Journal of Mineralogy and Petrology,2006,25(4):52–60.(in Chinese))
    [24]施行觉,吴永钢.储层条件下波速的变化规律及其影响因素的实验研究[J].地球物理学报,1998,41(2):234–241.(SHI Xingjue,WU Yonggang.The laboratory study on wave velocity under reservoir condition and its affection factors[J].Aata Geophysica Sinica,1998,41(2):234–241.(in Chinese))
    [25]刘斌,KERN H,POPP T.不同围压下孔隙度不同的干燥及水饱和岩样中的纵横波速度及衰减[J].地球物理学报,1998,41(4):537–546.(LIU Bin,KERN H,POPP T.velocities and attenuation of P-and S-waves in dry and wet rocks with different porosities under different confining pressures[J].Aata Geophysica Sinica,1998,41(4):537–546.(in Chinese))

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心