晋城矿区煤体结构及其测井响应特征研究
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
煤体结构是影响煤层气开发效果的重要因素,准确评价煤体结构是煤层气勘探开发研究的一个关键问题。根据煤体破裂的程度,参照《防治煤与瓦斯突出细则》中煤的破坏类型划分方案,将煤体结构划分为完整结构、块裂结构、碎裂结构、碎粒结构和糜棱结构,前两者为原生结构煤;后三者为构造煤。以沁水盆地南部晋城矿区典型矿井为对象,分析了不同煤体结构的测井响应特征。研究发现:随着煤体破碎程度的增高,井径、声波时差、补偿中子、自然电位值和自然伽马响应逐渐增强,电阻率、密度响应逐渐减弱;原生结构煤的自然伽马、自然电位、补偿中子、井径和声波时响应较弱,电阻率和密度响应较强,构造煤反之。
The coalbody structure would be an important factor affected to coalbed methane development effect and an accurate evaluation of the coalbody structure would be a key issue of the study on the coalbed methane exploration and development. According to the coal breaking degree and based on the coal failure type division plan stipulated in Regulations on Coal and Gas Outburst Prevention,the coalbody structure was divided to a completed structure,a block breaking structure,a broken structure,broken partical structure and mylonite structure.The first two structures would be primary structure coal and late three structures would be structure coal.Based on a typical mine in Jincheng Mining Area at the south part of Qinshui Basin as an object,the paper analyzed the logging response features of different coal structure.The study showed that with coal broken degree increased,well diameter,acoustic time difference,compensated neutron,natural potential value and natural gamma response would steadily increased and electrical resistivity and density response would be steadily reduced.The natural gamma,natural potential value,compensated neutron,well diameter and acoustic time difference response of the primary structure coal were quite weak,the electrical resistivity and density response would be quite high and the structural coal was on the contrary.
引文
[1]孟召平,田永东,李国富.煤层气开发地质学理论与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
    [2]Hou Q,Li H,Fan J,et al.Structure and coalbed methane occurrence in tectonically deformed coals[J].Science China Earth Sciences,2012,55(11):1755-1763.
    [3]于不凡.煤和瓦斯突出机理[M].北京:煤炭工业出版社,1985.
    [4]Dashtian Hassan,Jafari G Reza,Sahimi Muhammad,et al.Scaling,multifractality,and long-range correlations in well log data of large-scale porous media[J].Physica A:Statistical Mechanics and its Applications,2011,390:2096-2111.
    [5]陈勇,关达,陈洪德,等.地震属性技术在煤层及煤层气储层预测中的应用[J].石油天然气学报,2014,36(7):65-69
    [6]孟召平,郭彦省,张纪星.基于测井参数的煤层含气量预测模型与应用[J].煤炭科学技术,2014,42(6):25-30.
    [7]金泽亮,薛海飞,高海滨,等.煤层气储层测井评价技术及应用[J].煤田地质与勘探,2013,41(2):42-45.
    [8]侯俊胜.煤层气储层测井评价方法及其应用[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,2000.
    [9]Mullen M J.Log Evaluation in Well Drilled for Coalbed Methane[J].Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists,1989,38:113-124.
    [10]陆国桢,张凤威,傅雪海.测井解释煤层甲烷含量与煤层结构的研究[J].煤田地质与勘探,1997,25(6):54-57.
    [11]傅雪海,陆国桢,秦杰,等.测井响应值进行煤层气含量拟合和煤体结构划分[J].测井技术,1999,23(2):112-115.
    [12]陈健杰,江林华,张玉贵.不同煤体结构类型煤的导电性质研究[J].煤炭科学技术,2011,39(7):90-104.
    [13]谢学恒,樊明珠.基于测井响应的煤体结构定量判识方法[J].中国煤层气,2013,10(5):27-33.
    [14]李涛,李辉,王福忠.基于BP神经网络的煤体结构类型判识模型研究[J].煤矿安全,2011,42(11):19-22.
    [15]陈跃,汤达祯,许浩,等.基于测井信息的韩城地区煤体结构的分布规律[J].煤炭学报,2013,38(8):1435-1442.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心