汶川5.12大地震地表次生灾害评价与分析

英文篇名：Assessment and Analysis of the Secondary Geological Disasters Induced by the 5.12 Wenchuan Earthquake
中文刊名：地质学报
英文刊名：Acta Geologica Sinica
作者：孙晓宇 ; 周成虎 ; 郭兆成 ; 张俊 ; 苏奋振 ; 仉天宇 ; 张丹丹 ; 吕婷婷
英文作者：SUN Xiaoyu1 ; 2) ; ZHOU Chenghu1) ; GUO Zhaocheng1) ; ZHANG Jun1) ; SU Fenzhen1) ; ZHANG Tianyu2) ; ZHANG Dandan1) ; L Tingting1 ; 3)1) Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research ; CAS ; Beijing ; 100101 ; 2) National Marine Environmental Forecasting Center ; Beijing ; 100081 ; 3) College of Resources Science and Technology ; Beijing Normal University ; Beijing ; 100875
中文关键词：地震 ; 汶川 ; 次生地质灾害 ; 缓冲区 ; 空间分析
英文关键词：earthquake ; Wenchuan ; secondary geological disaster ; buffer ; spatial analysis
出版日期：2010-09-15
机构：中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所;国家海洋局海洋环境预报中心;北京师范大学资源学院;
年：2010
期：09
出版单位：地质学报

摘要

针对汶川5.12大地震,对由地震引起的地质次生灾害发生的坡度和坡向进行了统计,分析了地表破坏的易发坡度、坡向及其与震中的关系等。另外,分别以不同震中距为缓冲区、以平行中央断裂带的各级缓冲区、以等烈度区为缓冲区对地震引起的地表破坏的空间分布以及发生地表破坏的坡度在各级缓冲区中的变化进行了分析。结果表明:①地震引发的滑坡及滑坡群共5093个,总面积大约958km2;②在30°～44°坡度区间地表破坏发生的数量最大,42°坡度为地表破坏发生概率的拐点。主要的地表破坏发生在迎着地震波传播的坡向上;③随着震中距的增加,地表破坏的发生概率逐渐减小,震中距40km以内的速度减小非常迅速,40km以外则整体上缓慢减少,局部略有起伏。各缓冲区中发生地表破坏的平均坡度比缓冲区内的地形平均坡度大4°左右。④地震引发的地表破坏主要受到断裂带的控制,有64.17%的地表破坏发生在中央断裂带两侧10km范围内。⑤高地震烈度区域引发的地表破坏率远远大于低烈度区域,在烈度为Ⅺ度的区域内发生地表破坏率达到14.5%,而Ⅶ度烈度带上引发地表破坏率仅为0.01%。
The devastating Ms8.0 earthquake struck Wenchuan,China on 12 May 2008. It caused considerable damage and lots of secondary geological hazards such as landslides,collapses,mud-rock flows etc. Based on the interpretation of remote sensing images,this study built the geological hazards database. The areas in different slopes and aspects vulnerable by geological hazards were calculated using GIS tools,and the relationship between the ground damage induced by 5.12 Wenchuan earthquake and slopes was also analyzed. In addition,three kinds of buffer analysis methods were employed in this paper in order to identify the spatial distribution patterns of the ground damage. The results shows that:① the number of the secondary geological hazards interpreted by RS images in the study area was more than 5093 and the total area of ground damage induced by the Wenchuan earthquake was more than 958 sq. km. ② Most of the ground destruction occurred in the slope gradient ranging from 30° to 44°. Geological hazards distribution also shows a correlation with the orientation of mountain slopes,the geological hazards mainly happened at the aspects that faced the seismic wave. ③ With the increasing of epicenter distance,the probability of occurrence of geological hazards decreased gradually. The percentage of geological hazards within the 40km epicenter distance deceased greatly,and the average slope of geological hazards in every buffer was about 4 larger than the average slope of the buffer they located. ④ The geological hazards were distributed mainly around the seismic faults,and about 64.17% of them was distributed within the 10km range around the main seismic fault zone. ⑤ The geological hazards happened most frequently in the regions with high seismic intensity than in regions with low seismic intensity. The percentage of geological hazard was happened in region with Ⅺ degree of intensity was about 14.5% while it was only about 0.01% in region with Ⅶ degree of intensity.

引文

邓志辉,杨主恩,孙昭民,陈桂华,马文涛,孙谦.2008.四川汶川Ms8.0级地震北川-映秀地表破裂的复杂现象.科学通报,53(20):2509～2513.
    周荣军,黄润秋,雷建成,何玉林,黎小刚,王世元,叶友清,刘玉法,亢川川,梁明剑,戈天勇,何强,黄伟.2008.四川汶川8.0级地震地表破裂与震害特点.岩石力学与工程学报,27(11):2173～2183.
    李海兵,付小方,Jérome VAN DER WOERD,司家亮,王宗秀,侯立玮,邱祝礼,李宁,吴富峣,许志琴,Paul TAPPONNIER.2008.汶川地震(MS8.0)地表破裂及其同震右旋斜向逆冲作用.地质学报,82(12):1623～1642.
    黄润秋,李为乐.2008.“5.12”汶川大地震触发地质灾害的发育分布规律研究.岩石力学与工程学报,27(12):2585～2592.
    郭华东.2008.汶川地震灾害遥感图集.北京:科学出版社.
    吴珍汉,张作辰.2008.汶川8级地震地质灾害的类型及实例.地质学报,82(12):1747～1757.
    王振荣,兰江华.2008.四川汶川大地震的构造分析.矿物岩石,28(2):1～5.
    乔彦肖,马中社,吕凤军.2009.汶川地震地质灾害发育特点及动因机制分析.中国地质,36(3):736～741.
    张国民,邵志刚,刘桂萍,马宏生.2009.汶川8.0级地震构造动力成因分析.地震,29(1):164～173.
    李勇,黄润秋,周荣军,Alexander L.DENSMORE.2009.龙门山地震带的地质背景与汶川地震的地表破裂.工程地质学报,17(1):3～16.
    乔建平,蒲晓虹,王萌,田宏岭,杨宗佶,石莉莉.2009.大地震诱发滑坡的分布特点及危险性区划研究.灾害学,24(2):25～29.
    谢洪,王士革,孔纪名.2008.“5.12”汶川地震次生山地灾害的分布与特点.山地学报,26(4):396～401.
    姚文波,刘文兆,侯甬坚.2008.汶川大地震陇东黄土高原崩塌滑坡的调查分析.生态学报,28(12):5917～5926.
    许冲,戴福初,姚鑫汶.2009.汶川地震诱发滑坡灾害的数量与面积.科技导报,27(11):79～81.
    王智,庄亚芳,蒋明康,徐网谷.2009.汶川地震对自然保护区的生态影响评估及对策.四川环境,28(3):46～49.
    刘汉湖,黄润秋.2009.汶川桃关震区生态景观格局时空变化分析与生态地质环境评价.地质灾害与环境保护,20(2):104～111.
    李树德,任秀生,岳升阳,徐海鹏.2001.地震滑坡研究.水土保持学报,8(2):24～25.
    张永双,雷伟志,石菊松,吴树仁,王献.2008.四川5.12地震次生地质灾害的基本特征初析.地质力学学报,14(2):109～116.
    中华人民共和国国土资源部网,2008.http://www.mlr.gov.cn/zwgk/zqyj/201003/t20100325_142666.ht m.
    王运生,罗永红,吉峰,霍俊杰,吴峻峰,徐鸿彪.2008.汶川大地震山地灾害发育的控制因素分析.工程地质学报,16(6):759～763.
    许志琴,李海兵,吴忠良.2008.汶川地震和科学钻探.地质学报,82(12):1613～1622.
    张培震,徐锡伟,闻学泽,冉永康.2008.2008年汶川8.0级地震发震断裂的滑动速率、复发周期和构造成因.地球物理学报,51(4):1066～1073.
    李忠生.2003.国内外地震滑坡灾害研究综述.灾害学,18(4):64～70.
    中国国家地震局网,2008.http://www.cea.gov.cn/manage/ht ml/8a8587881632fa5c0116674a018300cf/sc/index.ht ml.
    Wu Zhenhan,Dong Shuwen,Patrick J.Barosh,Zhang Zuochengand Liao Huanjun.2009.Dextral-slip thrust faulting andseismic events of the Ms8.0Wenchuan earthquake inLongmenshan Mountains,eastern margin of the TibetanPlateau.Acta Geolologica Sinica,83(4),685～693.
    Chen Jianping,Li Jianfeng,Qin Xuwen,Dong Qingji,Sun Yan.2009.RS and GIS-based Statistical Analysis of Secondary GeologicalDisasters after the2008Wenchuan Earthquake.Acta GeologicaSinica,83(4):776～785.