底框架剪力墙砌体结构数值模拟分析
|
摘要
底框架剪力墙-上部砌体结构由于底部较柔,上部结构刚度较大,具有一定的耗能能力,在数值模拟时结构建模繁琐.通过对底框架剪力墙-上部砌体结构采用ANSYS有限元软件进行数值模拟分析,分别选用shell63单元和solid65单元模拟砌体结构,两种方法模拟的结构振型相似,自振频率的变化规律和墙体的厚度一致,即厚度小、频率高,厚度大,频率就小,结构受力和变形也和理论值一致;但solid65单元模拟的结构比shell63单元模拟的结构周期偏长,受力增大,塑性分析时,solid65单元不易收敛.通过比较发现,地震谱分析时,用shell63单元模拟能够得到理想的结果,方法简单.
The composite structure of shear-wall bottom and masonry frame is advantageous in energy dissipation with its flexible in the bottom and rigid in the upper body.However,it is difficult to simulate the structure due to the complex numerical algorithm.The ANSYS software was employed to analyze this composite structure.Shell63element and solid65element were adopted to model masonry structure respectively.It is found that two results have similar mode shapes;the natural frequencies are changed regularly with the thick of the wall,the frequency is high when the thickness of the wall is small,and it is low when the thickness is big;the stress and deformation of the structure is consistent with the theoretical results as well.The structure simulated with solid65element has a higher vibration period and greater stress than that with shell63element.But solid65element is converged slowly by plastic analysis.By comparative analysis,it is found that shell63element contributes better results and performs easily using the seismic response spectrum analysis.
The composite structure of shear-wall bottom and masonry frame is advantageous in energy dissipation with its flexible in the bottom and rigid in the upper body.However,it is difficult to simulate the structure due to the complex numerical algorithm.The ANSYS software was employed to analyze this composite structure.Shell63element and solid65element were adopted to model masonry structure respectively.It is found that two results have similar mode shapes;the natural frequencies are changed regularly with the thick of the wall,the frequency is high when the thickness of the wall is small,and it is low when the thickness is big;the stress and deformation of the structure is consistent with the theoretical results as well.The structure simulated with solid65element has a higher vibration period and greater stress than that with shell63element.But solid65element is converged slowly by plastic analysis.By comparative analysis,it is found that shell63element contributes better results and performs easily using the seismic response spectrum analysis.
引文
[1]李琪,顾荣蓉,杨鼎,等.底部框架-抗震墙砌体结构静力弹塑性分析[J].河海大学学报:自然科学版,2007,45(1):51-54.
[2]郑山锁,杨勇,赵鸿铁.底部框剪砌体房屋抗震性能的试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2004,37(5):23-32.
[3]郭猛,姚谦峰.框架-稀疏框格复合墙抗剪承载力计算方法研究[J].四川大学学报:工程科学版,2010,42(5):237-242.
[4]郑山锁,薛建阳,王斌.砌体结构抗震[M].北京:中国建材工业出版社,2008.
[5]何本国,陈天宇,王洋.ANSYS土木工程应用实例[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2011.
[6]GB50010-2010混凝土结构设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011.
[7]张琦彬.ANSYS在框架-砖混组合结构转换梁损伤分析中的运用[G].2004ANSYS中国用户论文集.
[8]GB50003-2001砌体结构设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2002.
[9]GB50011-2010建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011.
[2]郑山锁,杨勇,赵鸿铁.底部框剪砌体房屋抗震性能的试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2004,37(5):23-32.
[3]郭猛,姚谦峰.框架-稀疏框格复合墙抗剪承载力计算方法研究[J].四川大学学报:工程科学版,2010,42(5):237-242.
[4]郑山锁,薛建阳,王斌.砌体结构抗震[M].北京:中国建材工业出版社,2008.
[5]何本国,陈天宇,王洋.ANSYS土木工程应用实例[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2011.
[6]GB50010-2010混凝土结构设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011.
[7]张琦彬.ANSYS在框架-砖混组合结构转换梁损伤分析中的运用[G].2004ANSYS中国用户论文集.
[8]GB50003-2001砌体结构设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2002.
[9]GB50011-2010建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011.
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心