桩-土-结构相互作用下网壳结构简化计算方法
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
基于桩-土相互作用中地基土的离散模型和有限元模型,采用空间S-R模型和整体有限元法分别建立桩-土-单层柱面网壳结构相互作用的简化模型和一体化模型,简化模型中将地基土以离散的弹簧单元模拟,通过与一体化模型的对比分析,探究空间S-R模型分析桩-土-结构相互作用下大跨空间结构的适用性和精确度。研究表明:采用空间S-R模型建立的简化模型能够较好地模拟网壳结构自振特性和网壳屋盖地震响应,便于工程应用。简化模型得到的网壳屋盖第一阶自振频率与一体化模型的计算误差在10%之内,在不同地震作用下,简化模型得到的网壳屋盖节点加速度峰值与一体化模型结果的最大误差为13.05%,位移最大值的最大误差为7.20%,杆件内力最大误差为9.59%。
Based on the finite element model and discrete model of soil surrounding pile,the space S- R model and finite element method were adopted to establish a simplified model and an integrative model,which contains a singlelayer cylindrical latticed shell,pile and its foundation soil. The soil was replaced with spring in the simplified model,and it was compared with the integrative model. The applicability and accuracy of the space S- R model for analyzing the large span space structure considering pile-soil-structure interaction( PSSI) were studied. The results showed that the simplified model could simulate natural vibration characteristic and seismic response of the shell fairly well,and it is convenient to be used in engineering. The error of the first order vibration frequency of the shell calculated by the simplified model was less than 10% compared with the results of the integrative model. The maximal error of the peak acceleration of node was 13. 05% when it subjected to earthquake loads. The maximal error of the nodal displacement was 7. 20%,and the maximal error of the internal force of the members was 9. 59%.
引文
[1]Zeevaert L.Seismosoil Dynamics of Foundation in Mexico City Earthquake,September 19,1985[J].Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,1991(3):376-428.
    [2]冯远,刘宜丰,肖克艰.来自汶川地震亲历的第一手资料——结构工程师的视野和思考[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2009.
    [3]彭艳菊,唐荣余,吕悦军.天津滨海场地土类别特征及其对地震动影响[J].地震工程与工程振动,2004(2):46-52.
    [4]张之颖,吕西林,曹文清.软基上土-结构相互作用体系的一个广义简化动力计算模型[J].土木工程学报,2004,37(5):70-77.
    [5]张玉梅,宋玉普,张晓东.多向地震耦合作用下高耸结构土-结构动力相互研究[J].工程力学,2008,25(2):154-159.
    [6]徐鹏举,唐亮,凌贤长,等.液化场地桩-土-桥梁结构地震相互作用简化分析方法[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2010,40(5):1121-1127.
    [7]贺广零,周勇,李杰.风力发电高塔系统地震动力响应分析[J].工程力学,2009,26(7):72-77.
    [8]董石麟.中国空间结构的发展与展望[J].建筑结构学报,2010,31(6):38-51.
    [9]薛素铎,孙艳坤,栾小兵,等.考虑土-基础-结构相互作用的网架结构地震响应分析[J].建筑结构学报,2010(S2):34-38.
    [10]王国华,薛素铎,李雄彦,等.考虑土-结构相互作用的单层球面网壳动力稳定性研究[J].工业建筑,2011,41(S2):499-506.
    [11]Luan X B,Xue S D.The Effect of Soil Structure Interaction on the Seismic Response of Spatial Structure Subjected to the Near Fault Excitation[J].Applied Mechanics and Materials,2011,94(96):877-882.
    [12]楼梦麟,邸龙.考虑土-结构相互作用双层柱面网壳在多点输入下的地震反应[J].地震工程与工程振动,2006,26(3):228-231.
    [13]唐敢,陈少林,王法武,等.空间结构-地基动力相互作用的三维时域数值分析方法[J].工程力学,2009,26(8):143-149.
    [14]Inoue Y,Osawa Y,Matushima Y,et al.A Proposal for Seismic Design Procedure of Apartment Houses Including Soil-Structure Interaction Effect[C]∥Proceedings of Ninth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering.Tokyo-Kyoto,Japan:1988:365-370.
    [15]王松涛,曹资.现代抗震设计方法[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1997.
    [16]贺向丽,李同春.重力坝地震波动的时域数值分析[J].河海大学学报,2007,35(1):5-9.
    [17]刘晶波,吕彦东.结构-地基动力相互作用问题分析的一种直接方法[J].土木工程学报,1998,31(3):55-64.
    [18]Liu J B,Li B.A Unified Viscous-Spring Artificial Boundary for3-D Static and Dynamic Applications[J].Engineering and Materials Science,2005,48(5):570-584.
    [19]徐海滨,杜修力,赵密,等.地震波斜入射对高拱坝地震反应的影响[J].水力发电学报,2011(6):159-165.
    [20]刘毅,薛素铎,李雄彦.土-结构动力相互作用下网架结构动力性能研究[J].振动与冲击,2014,33(10):23-30.
    [21]卢华喜,梁平英,尚守平.成层地基-桩基-结构动力相互作用体系的计算分析[J].岩土力学学报,2007,29(5):705-711.
    [22]Yang D B,Zhang Y G,Wu J Z.Computation of Rayleigh Damping Coefficients in Seismic Time-History Analysis of Spatial Structures[J].Journal of International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures,2010,51(164):125-136.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心