高烈度地区框架-核心筒结构中美抗震设计方法对比
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
按照中美相关抗震设计规范分别对位于中国8度抗震设防区和美国典型高烈度区域(旧金山地区)的两栋层高与结构相似的钢筋混凝土框架-核心筒高层建筑结构进行了设计。介绍了抗震设计过程中根据中美相关抗震规范确定的地震作用参数与材料强度,比较了两国混凝土结构尤其是剪力墙结构抗震构造措施的异同。建立了两结构的空间弹性分析模型,采用振型分解反应谱法计算了两结构的弹性地震响应,比较了两结构自振周期、基底剪力、层剪力、结构层间变形、构件尺寸、配筋以及连梁受剪承载力等。计算结果表明:按照两国设计规范分别设计的结构,其设计地震作用水平相当;根据美国规范设计的结构连梁受剪承载力与中国规范设计方案相比偏低,约为中国规范设计方案的0.63~0.95倍;中美两国规范设计的剪力墙约束边缘构件的范围与配筋差异较大,中国规范设计方案剪力墙约束边缘构件内纵筋和箍筋集中在端部固定范围内,美国规范设计的箍筋约束范围大,对应端部固定范围的配筋比中国规范配筋量小。
Two reinforced concrete frame-core wall structures with similar story height and configuration,one located in 8 intensity precautionary zone in China and the other on typical high seismic zone in America( San Francisco) were designed conforming to Chinese and American seismic design codes,respectively. How to determine earthquake ground motion parameters and material strengths according to Chinese and American seismic design codes was introduced,and the differences of detailing requirements of concrete structures especially shear wall structures were compared. Linear seismic responses of two structures were calculated by modal response spectrum method,and the structural periods,base shear force,story shear force,inter-story drift ratio,component dimensions and amount of reinforcement,shear resisting capacity of coupling beams were compared. The predicted results indicate that: the design seismic base shear forces of two structures are close to each other; for the structure designed in conformity with American seismic design guidelines,the shear resisting capacity of coupling beams is 0. 63 ~ 0. 95 times corresponding those with the Chinese seismic design codes; for the structure designed based on Chinese code,the longitudinal and transverse reinforcement of shear wall boundary element concentrate in the edge specified area,for the structure designed based on American code,transverse reinforcement of boundary element confines more area,and longitudinal reinforcement distributes over all the confined area,but the amount of longitudinal reinforcement is less than that of the structure designed based on Chinese code for the same edged area.
引文
[1]罗开海,王亚勇.中美欧抗震设计规范地震动参数换算关系的研究[J].建筑结构,2006,36(8):103-107.(LUO Kaihai,WANG Yayong.Research on conversion relationships among the parameters of ground motions in seismic design codes of China,America and Europe[J].Building Structure,2006,36(8):103-107.(in Chinese))
    [2]朱文静,伋雨林,夏文娟,等.中美抗震规范地震作用计算方法对比分析[J].华中科技大学学报(城市科学版),2009,26(3):79-85.(ZHU Wenjing,JI Yulin,XIA Wenjuan,et al.Comparison of earthquake calculation method in seismic code between China and the United States[J].Journal of Huazhong University Science Technology(Urban Science Edition),2009,26(3):79-85.(in Chinese))
    [3]李赫,罗超英,刘军,等.中美抗震规范的差异对比研究[J].建筑结构,2011,41(9):123-126.(LI He,LUO Chaoying,LIU Jun,et al.Analysis of differences between Chinese code and American code for seimic design[J].Building Structure,2011,41(9):123-126.(in Chinese))
    [4]叶列平,王宇航.中、美规范钢筋混凝土梁斜截面受剪承载力的计算对比[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2008,25(1):88-95.(YE Lieping,WANG Yuhang.Calculation and comparison of shear strength of RC beams between Chinese and American codes[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2008,25(1):88-95.(in Chinese))
    [5]叶列平,宋世研.中、美规范中受压构件的正截面承载力计算[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2008,25(2):56-63.(YE Lieping,SONG Shiyan.Calculations of design methods for flexture and axial strength of RC columns in Chinese and American codes[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2008,25(2):56-63.(in Chinese))
    [6]杨卓兴.中美高地震风险区钢筋混凝土框架结构抗震规定及性能对比研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2010:102-110.(YANG Zhuoxing.The comparison of seismic provisions and performance for Chinese reinforced concrete moment frames with American in high seismic risk zone[D].Chongqing:Chongqing University,2010:102-110.(in Chinese))
    [7]蒋薇.中美钢筋混凝土框架结构抗震破坏模式控制方法对比[D].重庆:重庆大学,2012:35-66.(JIANG Wei.Comparative analysis on control methods of earthquake-induced failure patterns of RC frame structures in China and USA[D].Chongqing:Chongqing University,2012:35-66.(in Chinese))
    [8]ASCE 7-10 Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures[S].Reston,VA:American Society of Civil Engineers/Structural Engineering Institute,2010.
    [9]ACI 318-11 Building code requirements for structural Concrete and commentary[S].Farmington Hills,MI:American Concrete Institute,2011.
    [10]GB 50011—2010建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.(GB 50011—2010 Code for seismic design of buildings[S].Beijing:China Architecture&Building Press,2010.(in Chinese))
    [11]GB 50010—2010混凝土结构设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.(GB 50010—2010Code for design of concrete structures[S].China Architecture&Building Press,2010.(in Chinese))
    [12]Moehle J P,Ghodsi T,Hooper J D,et al.Seismic design of cast-in-place concrete special structural walls and coupling beams:a guide for practicing engineers[M].Redwood City,CA:National Institute of Standards and Technology,2011:13-26.
    [13]中国建筑科学研究院.多层及高层建筑结构空间有限元分析与设计软件(墙元模型)Satwe 2010用户手册及技术条件[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011:78-80.
    [14]北京金土木软件技术有限公司.SAP2000使用指南[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2006:289-309.
    [15]Chadwell C B.XTRACT-cross section analysis software for structural and earthquake engineering[EB/OL].2004-07-02[2014-01-23].http://www.imbsen.com/xtract.htm.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心