2013年甘肃岷县漳县M_S6.6地震及其余震序列重定位
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
使用甘东南地区三维速度模型,利用三维网格搜索法和双差地震定位法对2013年7月22日甘肃岷县漳县MS6.6地震及其震后三天的余震序列进行了精确定位,结合地质构造资料对本次地震的发震构造进行了初步研究。其结果显示:主震的震中位置为34.54°N,104.189°E,震源深度13.5km;余震震中呈NW或NWW方向分布,与临潭-宕昌断裂的走向基本吻合,主要分布于5~20km的深度,震中在深度剖面上呈SW向;发震断裂为倾向SW的隐伏断层,位于临潭-宕昌断裂NE方向,距临潭-宕昌断裂约20km。
A 3-D velocity model of the southeast Gansu Province region,including the 3-D grid searching algorithm and double difference method,was used to examine the relocation the Minxian-Zhangxian MS6.6 earthquake occurring on July 22,2013,and its aftershocks from July 22to July 25.The grid search method was used to determine earthquake location and the S-P arrival time of 400seismic events,which agreed with data detected by at least three stations.Of these events,336were used to calculate double-difference location,and 261were used to obtain the relocation results.After relocation,the average estimation errors of the source location were 1498m in the E-W direction,1385.2min the N-S direction,and 2 492.3min the vertical direction.On the basis of these calculation results,the seismogenic structure was compared with the data of geological structure,and the results showed that the mainshock was relocated to 34.54°N,104.189°E,with a focal depth of 13.5km.The aftershocks were distributed mainly between the Lintan-Tanchang fault and the northern edge of the West Qinling fault;several were distributed in the southwestern region of the Lintan fault.The distribution of the aftershocks was in the NW or NWW direction,which is essentially consistent with the strike of Lintan-Tanchang fault,although the dominant distribution was not obvious.Therefore,we examined the A-A′profile perpendicular to the direction to research the relationship between the distribution of earthquakes and fracture structure and determined that this profile crosscuts the Lintan-Tanchang fault.We obtained similar results using the 3-D grid searching algorithm and the double difference method,which revealed that the focus depths are mainly distributed in 0~10km before relocation,and the average depth was 6km.In contrast,the focus depths of the aftershocks were distributed mainly in 5~20km after relocation,which indicates that the aftershock sequence occurred mainly in the upper and lower crust.The distribution of the earthquake was in the SW direction,thus,we speculate that the dip direction of the seismogenic fault was SW,and the deep distribution is deeper.The focus depths determined by the 3-D grid-searching algorithm can reach to 25km,whereas those determined by the double difference method were deeper at a maximum of 30km.The Lintan-Tanchang fault,with a NW-NWW strike and a SW dip of 50°-70°,is in closest proximity to the earthquake swarm and is located between the East Kunlun fault and the northern edge of West Qinling fault.The transition fracture of the structural change and the geologic structure of the transition zone are complex and provide the regional geological background.The seismic profile A-A′shows that the basic characteristics of the seismogenic fault,with a SW dip direction,differ from those of the Lintan-Tanchang fault such that their exposures at the surface are 20km apart.Therefore,we believe that Fault F3is a seismogenic fault.However,other characteristics of Fault F3are unclear and need to be developed through active fault detection research.
引文
[1]Pavlis G L.Appraising Earthquake Hypocenter Location Errors:A Complete,Practical Approach for Single-event Locations[J].Bull.Seism.Soc.Am.,1986,76:1699-1717.
    [2]Gomberg J S,K M Shedlock,S W Roecker.The Effect of Swave Arrival Times on the Accuracy of Hypocenter Estimation[J].Bull.Seism.Soc.Am.,1990,80:1605-1628.
    [3]郑文俊,刘小凤,赵广堃,等.2003年11月13日甘肃岷县MS5.2地震基本特征[J].西北地震学报,2006,27(1):61-65.Zheng W J,Liu X F,Zhao G K,et al.Principal features of Minxian MS5.2Earthquake in Gansu Province,on Nov.13,2003[J].Northwestern Seismological Journal,2005,27(1):61-65.(in Chinese)
    [4]何文贵,周志宇,马尔曼,等.岷县—卓尼5.0级地震的基本特征和地质背景研究[J].西北地震学报,2006,29(4):50-55.He W G,Zhou Z Y,Ma E M,et al.Basic Features and Geological Background of the Minxian-Zhuoni M5.0Earthquake on Sep.7,2004[J].Northwestern Seismological Journal,2006,29(4):50-55.(in Chinese)
    [5]高见,张元生,郭飚等.甘东南流动台阵微震监测结果[J].地震工程学报,2013,35(1):177-182.Gao J,Zhang Y S,Guo B.et al.Microearthquake Location Determined by Portable Seismic Array Data in southeast Gansu Province[J].China Earthquake Engineering Journal,2013,35(1):177-182.(in Chinese)
    [6]Waldhauser F,Ellsworth W L.A Double-difference Earthquake Location Algorithm:Method and Application to the Northern Hayward Fault,California[J].Bull.Seism.Socl.Am.,2000,90(6):1353-1368.
    [7]张元生,李清河,徐果明.联合利用走时与波形反演技术研究地壳三维速度结构(I)一理论与方法[J].西北地震学报,l998,20(2):8-15.Zhang Y S,Li Q H,Xu G M.Combined Inversion Technique to Study 3 Crustal Velocity Structure by Using Seismic Wave Travel Time and Wave Form(I)Theory and Method[J].Northwestern Seismological Journal(in Chinese),1998,20(2):8-15.(in Chinese)
    [8]张元生,李清河,刘耀炜等.地震层析成像软件[J].西北地震学报,2003,25(2):170-174.Zhang Y S,Li Q H,Liu Y W,et al.The Seismic Tomography Software[J].Northwestern Seismological Journal(in Chinese),2003,25(2):170-174.(in Chinese)
    [9]张元生,周民都,荣代潞等.祁连山中东段地区三维速度结构研究[J].地震学报,2003,26(2):247-255.Zhang Y S,Zhou M D,Rong D L,et al.3DVelocity Structure in the Central Eastern Part of Qilinshan[J].Acta Seismologica Sinica,2003,26(2):247-255.(in Chinese)
    [10]李清河,张元生,So Gu Kim.朝鲜半岛南部三维地壳速度结构成像[J].地球物理学报,2007,50(4):1073-1081.Li Q H,Zhang Y S,So Gu Kim.3-D Crustal Velocity Tomography in the Southern Korean Peninsula[J].Chinese J.Geophys.,2007,50(4):1073-1081.(in Chinese)
    [11]张辉,王熠熙,冯建刚.甘东南地区地壳介质各向异性特征[J].西北地震学报,2011,33(2):111-116.Zhang H,Wang Y X,Feng J G.Seismic Anisotropy in the Crust in Southeastern Area of Gansu Province[J].Northwestern Seismological Journal,2011,33(2):111-116.(in Chinese)
    [12]惠少兴,张元生,李顺成.t-D地震定位方法研究[J].西北地震学报,2012,34(1):10-13.Hui S X,Zhang Y S,Li S C.Study on the t-DEarthquake Location Method[J].Northwestern Seismological Journal.2011,33(2):111-116.(in Chinese)

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心