紫坪铺面板坝加速度地震反应振动台模型试验研究

英文篇名：The shaking table model test study on acceleration seismic response of Zipingpu CFRD
中文刊名：土木工程学报
英文刊名：China Civil Engineering Journal
作者：周国斌 ; 刘小生 ; 赵剑明 ; 刘启旺 ; 杨玉生 ; 杨正权
英文作者：Zhou Guobin Liu Xiaosheng Zhao Jianming Liu Qiwang Yang Yusheng Yang Zhengquan(Department of Geotechnical Engineering ; China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research ; Beijing 100044 ; China)
中文关键词：振动台模型试验 ; 紫坪埔面板坝 ; 地震动输入 ; 时程曲线
英文关键词：shaking table model test ; Zipingpu CFRD ; input of seismic ground motion ; time hisory curves
出版日期：2012-07-15
机构：中国水利水电科学研究院岩土工程研究所;
年：2012
期：S1
出版单位：土木工程学报

摘要

混凝土面板堆石坝的加速度地震反应是其设计和运行中参考的主要依据之一。由于数值方法难以准确模拟土石填筑材料的复杂特性,振动台模型试验被应用于高面板坝坝体的加速度地震反应研究。本文通过对紫坪铺面板堆石坝的大型振动台三维模型试验,得到不同地震动工况下加速度在坝体中的分布以及加速度放大倍数沿坝高的分布。研究发现,在输入加速度幅值较低时坝体的加速度放大倍数最大值出现在0.8倍坝高左右,放大倍数随着输入地震动幅值的增大而减小,并且放大倍数极值出现位置逐渐上移到坝顶。相同高程测点的加速度反应,下游坡面最大,坝体内部加速度小于坝体表面加速度。
The acceleration seismic response of CFRD is one of the primary basis for the designing and operating.It is difficult to simulate the complex characters of earth-rock material by numerical calculation,So the shaking table model test is used in the study for acceleration seismic response of high CFRD.The 3D shaking model test of Zipingpu CFRD is carried out,and the distribution for the amplification factor of acceleration along the relatively height with different earthquake motions is obtained.It is concluded that the maximum amplification factor is located in the 0.75 times height of the dam.The amplification factor increases with the decrease of acceleration amplitude input,and the maximum factor gradually moved up to the top of dam.Acceleration seismic response of the measurement points with the same elevation in downstream slope is the largest,and the acceleration on the surface is larger than that inside.

引文

[1]韩国城,孔宪京,李俊杰.面板堆石坝动力破坏特性及抗震措施试验研究[J].水利学报,1990(5):61-67(HanGuocheng,Kong Xianjing,Li Junjie.Study on dynamicfailure and earthquake resistant measure of concrete-facedrockfill dam[J].Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,1990(5):61-67(in Chinese))
    [2]杨星,刘汉龙,余挺,等.高土石坝震害与抗震措施评述[J]防灾减灾学报,2009,29(5):583-590(Yang Xing,Liu Hanlong,Yu Ting,et al.Review on seismic disastersand aseismatic measures of high earth and rockfill dams[J].Journal of Disaster Prevention and MitigationEngineering,2009,29(5):583-590(in Chinese))
    [3]刘小生,王钟宁,汪小刚,等.面板坝大型振动台模型试验与动力分析[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2005(Liu Xiaosheng,Wang Zhongning,Wang Xiaogang,et al.Large scale shaking table model test and dynamic analysisof concrete face rockfill dam[M].Beijing:China WaterPower Press,2005(in Chinese))
    [4]陈生水,霍家平,章为民.“5.12”汶川地震对紫坪铺混凝土面板坝的影响及原因分析[J].岩土工程学报,2008,30(6):795-801(Chen Shengshui,Huo Jiaping,Zhang Weimin.Analysis of effects of“5.12”WenchuanEarthquake on Zipingpu concrete face rock-fill dam[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2008,30(6):795-801(in Chinese))
    [5]赵剑明,周国斌,关志诚等.紫坪铺“5.12”震害对面板堆石坝抗震措施的若干启示[J].水电能源科学,2012(1):24-27