浅硬场地剪切波速测试标准差对地震动影响初探
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
采用Shake 2000程序,以Turkey Flat试验场地为模型,通过输入不同类型下多种强度的地震波,计算研究多工况下剪切波速测试标准差对地表加速度反应谱和峰值加速度的影响。结论为:(1)浅硬场地上剪切波速测试标准差对地震动的影响很大,影响程度与输入地震波的强度和频率以及场地剪切波速计算值有关;(2)如果将反应谱残差大于20%或加速度峰值差别大于20%定义为统计意义上的不可忽略,那么剪切波速测试标准差对计算结果的影响在大多数情况下均不可忽略;(3)当输入波的卓越周期与场地特征周期接近时,浅硬场地上剪切波速测试标准差引起的反应谱变化非常显著;(4)只有当输入波的卓越周期与场地特征周期相差较大且输入波强度偏小时,剪切波速测试标准差引起的反应谱变化才可略去;(5)当浅硬场地上剪切波速实测结果低于统计均值时,地震动计算结果的偏差一般明显大于剪切波速实测结果,高于统计均值时引起的偏差,且地震输入越强表现越明显。
This study addressed the influence of the shear-wave velocity test standard deviation on ground motion.The Shake 2000 program and site model of Turkey Flat were used to analyze the response spectrum of ground and peak acceleration under a variety of engineering conditions by inputting different types of multi-intensity seismic waves.The study concluded the following:(1)the impact of the shear wave velocity test standard deviation on ground motion in the shallow stiff soil site is related to the intensity and frequency of the input seismic waves,and the calculated value of shear wave velocity;(2)if the response spectrum residuals or peak acceleration D-value exceed 20%,the effects of the velocity test standard deviation cannot be ignored in most situations;(3)when the predominant period of the input ground motion is similar to the characteristic site period,the changes of the response spectrum caused by the shear wave velocity test standard deviation in the shallow stiff soil site is significant;(4)only when the predominant period of the input ground motion with weak intensity and the characteristic site period are largely different,can the changes in the response spectrum caused by the test standard deviation be omitted;and(5)if the shear wave velocity in the shallow stiff soil is lower than the statistical mean value,the calculated value deviation of ground motion is larger than the measured value of shear wave velocity which is higher than the calculated mean value,and the ground response is more obvious with higher intensity of the input ground motion.
引文
[1]中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB 17741-2005工程场地地震安全性评价[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2005:16-47.Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China.GB17741-2005Evaluation of Seicmic Safety for Engineering Sites[S].Beijing:Standards Press of China,2005:16-47.(in Chinese)
    [2]中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.GB 50011-2010建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010:15-40.Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the Peopl’s Republic of China.GB50011-2010Seismic Design Code[S].Beijing:China Architecture&Building Press,2010:15-40.((in Chinese)
    [3]工程地质手册编委会.工程地质手册[M].4版.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2007.The Editorial Board of the Handbook of the Engineering Geology.The Handbook of the Engineering Geology[M].4th ed.Beijing:China Architecture&Building Press,2007.(in Chinese)
    [4]Annie O L Kwok,Jonathan P Stewart,Youssef M A.Hashash,Nonlinear Ground-Response Analysis of Turkey Flat Shallow Stiff-soil Site to Strong Ground Motion[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,February,2008,98:331-343.
    [5]中华人民共和国建设部.GB50021-2001岩土工程勘察规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2001.Ministry of Construction of PRC.GB50021-2001Code for Investigation of Geotechnical Engineering[S].Beijing:China Architecture&Building Press,2001.(in Chinese)
    [6]刘红帅,郑桐,薄景山,等.粘性土剪切波速不确定性的统计分析[J].世界地震工程,2010,26(增刊):99-103.LIU Hong-shuai,ZHENG Tong,BO Jing-shan,et al.Statistical Analysis of Uncertainty for Shear Wave Velocities of Cohesive Soils[J].World Earthquake Engineering,2010,26(Supl):99-103.(in Chinese)
    [7]王广军,苏经宇.剪切波速度统计结果及其在场地分类中的应用[J].建筑科学,1986(1):69-76.WANG Guang-jun,SU Jing-yu.Some Statistical Analytical Results of Shear Wave Velocity and its Application in the Site Classification[J].Building Science,1986(1):69-76.(in Chinese)
    [8]高玉峰,刘汉龙.合肥膨胀土剪切波速的特征分析[J].岩土工程学报,2003,25(3):371-373.GAO Yu-feng,LIU Han-long.Study on Shear Wave Velocities in Expansive Soils of Hefei[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2003,25(3):371-373.(in Chinese)
    [9]齐文浩,刘德东,兰景岩,等.西安阎良区土层剪切波速统计分析[J].防灾科技学院学报,2008,10(4):10-12.QI Wen-hao,LIU De-dong,LAN Jing-yan,et al.Statistical Analysis of Soil Layers’Shear Wave in Yanliang,Xi’an[J].Journal of Institute of Disaster-Prevention Science and Technology,2008,10(4):10-12.(in Chinese)
    [10]刘红帅,薄景山,吴兆营,等.土体参数对地表加速度峰值和反应谱的影响[J].地震研究,2005,28(2):167-171.LIU Hong-shuai,BO Jing-shan,WU Zhao-ying,et al.Effects of Soil Parameters on Ground Surface Acceleration Peak and Response Spectra[J].Journal of Seismological Research,2005,28(2):167-171.(in Chinese)
    [11]李平,薄景山,孙有为.剪切波速差异性对地震反应的影响[J].世界地震工程,2010,26(增刊):133-137.LI Ping,BO Jing-shan,SUN You-wei.Shear Wave Velocity Diversity Influence on the Seismic Response[J].World Earthquake Engineering,2010,26(Supl):133-137.(in Chinese)
    [12]高玉峰,刘汉龙,朱伟.剪切波速对砂土层地震反应的影响[J].工程勘察,2001(1):39-42.GAO Yu-feng,LIU Han-long,ZHU Wei.Effect of Shear Wave Velocity on the Seismic Response of Sand Ground[J].Geotechnical Investigation&Surveying,2001(1):39-42.(in Chinese)
    [13]陈国兴,刘雪珠,王炳辉.土动力参数变异性对深软场地地表地震动参数的影响[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2007,27(1):1-10.CHEN Guo-xing,LIU Xue-zhu,WANG Bing-hui.Effect of Variability of Soil Dynamic Parameters on Ground Motion Parameters for Deep Soft Sites[J].Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering,2007,27(1):1-10.(in Chinese)
    [14]Real C R.Turkey Flat,USA Site Effects Test Area:Report2,Site Characterization[R].Calif Div of Mines and Geology Tech Rept,1988,88-2.
    [15]吕红山,赵凤新.适用于中国场地分类的地震动反应谱放大系数[J].地震学报,2007,29(1):67-77.LV Hong-shan,ZHAO Feng-xin.Site Coefficients Suitable to China Site Category[J].Acta Seismologica Sinica,2007,29(1):67-77.(in Chinese)

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心