不同方案的防屈曲支撑框架的地震反应对比分析
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
使用防屈曲支撑替换钢支撑钢框架结构中的中心支撑,按等刚度替换方法和减刚度替换方法设计三种不同的替换方案,采用振型分解反应谱法和静力弹塑性分析法对比分析钢框架结构、钢支撑框架结构和防屈曲支撑钢框架结构的地震反应。结果表明:多遇地震下,中心钢支撑和防屈曲支撑都能为结构提供抗侧刚度,减小框架柱承担的剪力和倾覆弯矩,减小结构的层间位移;而在罕遇地震下,中心钢支撑发生屈曲,结构的刚度退化严重,结构的抗侧能力较差,而防屈曲支撑屈服不屈曲,结构的刚度减小,但不会产生严重退化,结构的抗侧能力较好。当采用等刚度法将普通支撑替换为防屈曲支撑后,结构中梁铰和柱铰的个数均减少,框架梁的损伤较轻,但首层与支撑相连的柱损伤较严重;当采用减刚度法将普通支撑替换为防屈曲支撑后,结构中柱铰的个数减少,而梁铰的个数增加,与等刚度替换的情况相比,首层与支撑相连的损伤较轻,防屈曲支撑的耗能能力发挥得更加充分。
Ordinary concentrically braces(OCB) in steel concentrically braced frames was replaced by buckling restrained braces(BRB),three schemes were designed according to two principles, seismic response analysis of different structures has been carried out The analysis reveals that, ordinary concentrically braces and buckling restrained brace can augment the frame stiffness,decrease the shears and overturning moment of column as well as the story drift in the frequently earthquake, yet in rare earthquake, the frame stiffness decreased largely on account of the ordinary concentrically braces were buckling. By contrast, the buckling restrained brace was yielding instead of buckling, the frame stiffness decrease slightly. When OCB was replaced by BRB in according to equal-stiffness principle, the number of the beam plastic hinge and column plastic hinge were reduced, and the plasticity extent of the beams were reduced, but the plasticity extent of the column attached to BRB were increased When OCB was replaced by BRB in according to lessen-stiffness principle, the number of the column plastic hinge and the plasticity extent of the column attached to BRB were reduced, the number of the beam plastic hinge were increased, the energy-dissipating capacity of BRB can be used more fully.
引文
[1]JGJ 99—98高层民用建筑钢结构技术规程[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1998(JGJ 99—98 Technical specifi cation for steel structure of tall buildings[S].Beijing:China Architecture and Building Press,1998(in Chinese))
    [2]连尉安,张耀春.钢支撑及框架-中心支撑双重抗侧力体系研究现状、不足及改进[J].地震工程与工程振动,2005,25(3):67-75(LianWeian,Zhang Yaochun.Present research,problems and improvements on steel braces and dual systems of concentrically braced frames[J].Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,2005,25(3):67-75(in Chinese))
    [3]周云.防屈曲耗能支撑结构设计与应用[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2007
    [4]周云,钱洪涛,褚洪民,等.新型防屈曲耗能支撑设计原理与性能研究[J].土木工程学报,2009,42(4):64-71(Zhou Yun,Qian Hongtao,Chu Hongmin,et al.A study on the design principle and performance of a new type of Buckling-Resistant Brace[J].China Civil EngineeringJournal,2009,42(4):64-71(in Chinese))
    [5]程绍革,罗开海,孔祥雄.含有屈曲约束支撑框架的振动台试验研究[J].建筑结构,2010,40(10):11-14(Cheng Shaoge,Luo Kaihai,Kong Xiangxiong.Experiment study on shaking table test of steel frame with buckling restrained braces[J].Building Structure,2010,40(10):11-14(in Chinese))
    [6]李培彬,娄宇,赵广鹏,等.屈曲约束支撑在北京银泰中心结构抗震设计中的应用[J].建筑结构,2007,37(11):5-7(Li Peibin,Lou Yu,Zhao Guangpeng,et al.Using unbonded braces in aseismatic design for steel tower of Beijing Yintai Center[J].Building Structure,2007,37(11):5-7(in Chinese))
    [7]芮明倬,李立树,贺军利,等.屈曲约束支撑在古北财富中心高层钢结构中的应用研究[J].建筑结构,2007,37(5):25-28(Rui Mingzhuo,Li Lishu,He Junli,et al.Study and design of high-rise steel structure offi ce building with unbonded braces[J].Building Structure,2007,37(5):25-28(in Chinese))
    [8]任重翠,徐自国,肖从真,等.防屈曲支撑在超高层建筑结构伸臂桁架中的应用[J].建筑结构,2013,43(5):54-59(Ren Chongcui,Xu Ziguo,Xiao Congzhen,et al.Application of unbonded brace in super high-rise structure with cantilever truss[J].Building Structure,2013,43(5):54-59(in Chinese))
    [9]高向宇,张腾龙,黄海涛,等.用防屈曲支撑改进钢框架-支撑结构抗震性能的设计方法[J].北京工业大学学报,2010,36(9):1206-1214(Gao Xiangyu,Zhang Tenglong,Huang Haitao,et al.The design method for improving the aseismatic performance of concentrically braced steel frames with buckling-restrained brace[J].Journal of Beijing University of Technology,2010,36(9):1206-1214(in Chinese))
    [10]GB50011—2010建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010(GB50011—2010 Code for seismic design of buildings[S].Beijing:China Architecture and Building Press,2010(in Chinese))

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心