以剪切波速与地表峰值加速度为依据的地震液化确定性及概率判别法
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
剪切波速作为土性的基本参数,为评价土体抵抗地震液化的能力提供了一种方法。回顾了以剪切波速和地表峰值加速度为依据的场地地震液化判别方法的演化历史,依据他人收集的现场液化资料,合计49次地震、618例液化/不液化场地数据,提出了确定液化临界曲线的基本原则,给出了基于修正剪切波速与地表峰值加速度的液化临界曲线,验证了液化临界曲线的位置对细粒含量、有效上覆压力、震级等因素取值变化的合理性,分析了估计土层循环应力比CSR的剪应力折减系数、震级标定系数、有效上覆压力修正系数等因素的不确定性对液化临界曲线的敏感性。结果表明:液化临界曲线对各种影响因素具有很好的适用性。利用Monte Carlo模拟、加权最大似然法和加权经验概率法,给出了建议的液化临界曲线的名义抗液化安全系数与液化概率的经验关系式及概率等值线,并对核电厂Ⅰ类、Ⅱ类和Ⅲ类抗震物项地基,分别建议了相应的液化临界曲线。该方法以丰富的现场液化数据为依据,具有广泛的应用前景。
As a fundamental parameter of soil, the shear wave velocity(denoted VS)offers a means to determine the seismic resistance of soil to liquefaction. The historical developments of VS and peak ground acceleration(denoted PGA) — — based assessment method of soil liquefaction potential is reviewed. The basic principle to determine liquefaction triggering curve is given.The corresponding liquefaction triggering curve is proposed based on the database used by Kayen, Andrus, Saygili and Chu for a total of 49 earthquakes, 618 case histories. The position of liquefaction triggering curve is verified with respect to various factors based on the case history database, such as fines content, overburden stress and magnitude scales. In addition, the sensitivity of the database's interpretation to a number of aspects and components of the analysis framework is examined, such as the shear stress reduction factor that accounts for the dynamic response of the soil profile, the magnitude scaling factor, the overburden correction factor for cyclic stress ratio. And the results show these factors have slight effects on the position of the proposed liquefaction triggering curve. At last, the relationship between nominal safety factor and probability of liquefaction as well as the probabilistic contours for the proposed liquefaction triggering curve are given based on Monte Carlo simulation, the weighted maximum likelihood method and weighted empirical probability data. The soil liquefaction triggering curves are proposed for the seismic design category Ⅰ 、 Ⅱ and Ⅲ of the structure, system and component of nuclear power plants, respectively. The presented assessment is provided with wide application prospects.
引文
[1]陈国兴,孔梦云,李小军,等.以标贯试验与地表峰值加速度为依据的砂土液化确定性及概率判别法[J].岩土力学,2015,36(1):9-27.CHEN Guo-xing,KONG Meng-yun,LI Xiao-jun,et al.Deterministic and probabilistic triggering correlations for assessment of seismic soil liquefaction at nuclear power plant[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2015,36(1):9-27.
    [2]IDRISS I M,BOULANGER R W.Semi-empirical procedures for evaluating liquefaction potential during earthquakes[C]//Proceedings of the 11th ICSDEE&3rd ICEGE,2004.Davis:Department of Civil&Environmental Engineering University of California,2004.
    [3]IDRISS I M,BOULANGER R W.SPT-based liquefaction triggering procedures(Rep.UCD/CGM-10/02)[R].Davis:Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California,2010.
    [4]KAYEN R,MOSS R E S,THOMPSON E M,et al.Shear-wave velocity–based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2013,139(3):407-419.
    [5]ANDRUS R D,STOKOE K H I I,CHUNG R M.Draft guidelines for evaluating liquefaction resistance using shear wave velocity measurements and simplified procedures[M].Maryland:US Department of Commerce,Technology Administration,National Institute of Standards and Technology,1999.
    [6]SAYGILI G.Liquefaction potential assessment in soil deposits using artificial neural networks[D].Montreal:Concordia University,2005.
    [7]CHU B L,HSU S C,CHANG Y M.Ground behavior and liquefaction analyses in central Taiwan-Wufeng[J].Engineering Geology,2004,71(1):119-139.
    [8]DOBRY R,POWELL D J,YOKEL F Y,et al.Liquefaction potential of saturated sand—the stiffness method[C]//Proceedings of 7th World Conference on Earthquake Engineeing.New York:American Society of Civil Engineers,1980:25-32.
    [9]DOBRY R,STOKOE K H I I,LADD R S,et al.Liquefaction susceptibility from S-wave velocity[C]//Situ Test to Evaluate Liquefaction Susceptibily,Proceedings,ASCE National Convention.St.Louis:American Society of Civil Engineers,1981:81-544.
    [10]SEED H B,IDRISS I M,ARANGO I.Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data[J].Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,1983,109(3):458-482.
    [11]TOKIMASTU K,UCHIDA A.Correlation between liquefaction resistance and shear wave velocity[J].Soils and Foundations,Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering,1990,30(2):33-42.
    [12]KAYEN R E,MITCHELL J K,SEED R B,et al.Evaluation of SPT-,CPT-,and shear wave-based methods for liquefaction potential assessment using Loma Prieta data[C]//Fourth Japan-U.S.Workshop on Earthquake Resistant Design of Lifeline Facilities and Countermeasures for Soil Liquefaction,Honolulu,Hawaii.Buffalo:National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research,1992,1(92?0019):177-204.
    [13]LODGE A L.Shear wave velocity measurements for subsurface characterization[D].Berkeley:University of California,1994.
    [14]SEED H B,IDRISS I M.Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential[J].Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Divisions,American Society of Civil Engineers,1971,97(SM9):1249-1273.
    [15]ANDRUS R D,STOKOE K H.Liquefaction resistance based on shear wave velocity[C]//NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils,Salt Lake City,Utah,Technical Report NCEER-97-0022.New York:National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research,1997,97:89-128.
    [16]ANDRUS R D,STOKOE K H.Liquefaction resistance of soils from shear-wave velocity[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,ASCE,2000,126(11):1015-1025.
    [17]YOUD T L,IDRISS I M.Proceedings of the NCEER workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils[M].New York:State University of New York,1997.
    [18]YOUD T L,IDRISS I M,ANDRUS R D,et al.Liquefaction resistance of soils:summary report from the1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2001,127(10):817-833.
    [19]JUANG C H,CHEN C J,JIANG T.Probabilistic framework for liquefaction potential by shear wave velocity[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,ASCE,2001,127(8):670-678.
    [20]JUANG C H,JIANG T,ANDRUS R D.Assessing probability-based methods for liquefaction potential evaluation[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,ASCE,2002,128(7):580-589.
    [21]ZHOU Y G,CHEN Y M.Laboratory investigation on assessing liquefaction resistance of sandy soils by shear wave velocity[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2007,133(8):959-972.
    [22]CETIN K O,SEED R B,KIUREGHIAN A D,et al.Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,ASCE,2004,130(12):1314-340.
    [23]MOH.Site investigation of liquefied soil at Nantou and Wufeng Areas[M].Tai Wan:Ya Xin Engineering,2000.
    [24]HUANG Y T,HUANG A B,KUO Y C,et al.A laboratory study on the undrained strength of a silty sand from Central Western Taiwan[J].Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2004,24(9):733-743.
    [25]DABIRI R,ASKARI F,SHAFIEE A,et al.Shear wave velocity-based liquefaction resistance of sand-silt mixtures:determinstic versus probabilistic approach[J].Iranian Journal of Science and TechnologyTransastions of Civil Engineering,2011,35(C2):199-215.
    [26]LIU N,MITCHELL J K.Influence of nonplastic fines on shear wave velocity-based assessment of liquefaction[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2006,132(8):1091-1097.
    [27]KISHIDA T,BOULANGER R W,ABRAHAMSON N A,et al.Site effects for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta[J].Earthquake Spectra,2009,25(2):301-322.
    [28]SEED H B,IDRISS I M.Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes[M].Berkeley:Earthquake Engineering Research Institute,1982.
    [29]曹振中.汶川地震液化特征及砂砾土液化预测方法研究[D].哈尔滨:中国地震局工程力学研究所,2010.
    [30]KOKUSHO T,YOSHIDA Y,TANAKA Y.Shear wave velocity in gravelly soils with different particle gradings[C]//Static and Dynamic Properties of Gravelly Soils.Buffalo:[s.n.],1995:92-106.
    [31]LIN P S,CHANG C W,CHANG W J.Characterization of liquefaction resistance in gravelly soil:Large hammer penetration test and shear wave velocity approach[J].Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2004,24(9):675-687.
    [32]IYISAN R.Correlations between shear wave velocity and In-Situ penetration test results[J].Teknik Dergi,1996,7(2):1187-1199.
    [33]陈国兴,李方明.基于径向基函数神经网络模型的砂土液化概率判别方法[J].岩土工程学报,2006,28(3):301-305.CHEN Guo-xing,LI Fang-ming.Probabilistic estimation of sand liquefaction based on neural network model of radial basis function[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2006,28(3):301-305.
    [34]CETIN K O,KIUREGHIAN A D,SEED R B.Probabilistic models for the initiation of seismic soil liquefaction[J].Structural Safety,2002,24(1):67-82.
    [35]MOSS R E,SEED R B,KAYEN R E,et al.CPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of in situ seismic soil liquefaction potential[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,ASCE,2006,132(8):1032-1051.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心