基础提离对核电站结构地震响应的影响分析
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
当地震足够大时结构基础将会与下卧地基土发生分离,即所谓的基础提离现象。但该现象在常规的土-结构相互用(SSI)的地震响应分析中常常被忽视。核电站结构(NPP)由于特殊性,其设计地震强度一般较大,因而有可能发生基础提离现象。基于某简化核电站结构,利用大型通用软件ANSYS的接触面功能和弹簧单元,分别进行了四种工况的计算:1基础固定;2考虑基础提离,不考虑土-结构动力相互作用效应;3不考虑基础提离,但考虑土-结构动力相互作用效应;4同时考虑基础分离和土-结构动力相互作用效应。通过对比分析,确定合适的土-结构动力相互作用计算方法以及基础提离对核电站结构地震响应的影响。计算分析表明:1土-结构相互作用对核电站结构地震响应的影响不容忽视;2基础提离主要影响核电站结构竖向地震响应,而对结构水平向地震响应的影响较小。本文研究成果可为核电站结构的抗震分析提供参考。
The structure foundation may be separated from the supporting soil if the earthquake is strong enough,which is the so called phenomenon of foundation uplift. This phenomenon,unfortunately,is always neglected in seismic response analysis of soil-structure interaction( SSI) system. The designed seismic level for nuclear power plant( NPP) is usually very high because of its specificity,therefore,the foundation of nuclear power plant will probably be separated from the supporting soil. Based on a simplified NPP calculation model and by employing the contact function and spring element in the software ANSYS,four cases were considered: 1 foundation is fixed; 2 foundation uplift is considered and SSI effect is not considered; 3 SSI effect is considered and foundation uplift is not considered; 4 both foundation uplift and SSI effect are considered. The influences of SSI and foundation uplift on structural seismic response were analyzed by comparing the computation results. It is shown from the computation results that the influence of SSI on structural seismic response can not be neglected; foundation uplift influences structural vertical response mainly,and has a very little influence on structural horizontal response. The results provide some references to seismic design of NPP.
引文
[1]Chopra A K,Yim C S.Simplified earthquake analysis of structures with foundation uplift[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,1985,111(4):906-930.
    [2]Psycharis I N,Jennings P C.Rocking of slender rigid bodies allowed to uplift[J].Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamic,1982,11(1):57-76.
    [3]Housner G W.The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquake[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,1963,53(2):403-447.
    [4]Yim C S,Chopra A K.Earthquake response of structures with partial uplift on Winkler foundation[J].Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamic,1984,12(2):263-281.
    [5]Yim C S,Chopra A K.Dynamics of structures on two-spring foundation allowed to uplift[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics,1984,110(7):1124-1146.
    [6]Song Y H,Lee D G.An improved two-spring model for foundation uplift analysis[J].Computers and Structures,1993,46(5):791-805.
    [7]俞载道,职洪涛,曹国敖.基础提离、滑移对结构地震反应影响的探讨[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),1997,25(2):141-146.YU Zai-dao,ZHI Hong-tao,CAO Guo-ao.Study on the effect of base uplifting and sliding on earthquake response of structures[J].Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science Edition),1997,25(2):141-146.
    [8]Naohiro N,Susumu I,Osamu K,et al.An estimation method for basemat uplift behavior of NPP buildings[C].18th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology(SMiRT18),Beijing,1995.
    [9]Richart F E,Hall J R,Woods R D.Vibrations of soils and foundations[M].Englewood cliffs,New Jersey,Prentice Hall Inc.1970.
    [10]Veletsos A S,Verbic B.Vibration of viscoelastic foundations[J].Earthquake Engineering and Structure Dynamics,1973,2:87-102.
    [11]Dobry R,Gazetas G.Dynamic response of arbitrary shaped foundations[J].Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,1984,112(2):109-135.
    [12]Gazetas G.Formulas and charts for impedances of surface and embedded foundations[J].Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,1991,117(9):1363-1381.
    [13]ASCE Standard 4-98,Seismic analysis of safety-related nuclear structures and commentary[S].ASCE,1999.
    [14]Sung G C,Yong I L,Jae S K,et al.A study on the criterion of fixed base condition in soil-structure interaction analysis of nuclear power plant structure[C].18th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology(SMiRT18),Toronto,2007.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心