成都市抗震救灾健康教育策略选择及效果评价
|
摘要
目的了解评估成都市"5.12"地震灾区抗震救灾中健康教育工作的策略和效果。方法采用随机抽样和回顾调查的方式,于地震发生1年后,调查600名灾区群众相关卫生知识知晓、健康行为形成及获得卫生知识的渠道等方面的情况,并与地震前进行对比研究。结果灾区群众相关卫生知识平均知识知晓率为89.80%,比地震前高出20.92%;平均健康行为形成率为82.96%,比地震前高出19.71%;获得卫生知识的途径和顺位构成与震前有较大差异。结论成都市地震灾区健康教育策略是行之有效的。
Objective To summary the development of health education strategies and evaluate their effects after the ‘May 12 earthquake’. Methods In May 2009, 600 people selected by random sampling in quake-hit areas received questionnaire survey on the awareness of health knowledge, the health behaviors and the channel to learn health knowledge. The findings were compared with those of pre-quake period. Results The average rate of awareness of health knowledge was 89.80%, 20.92% higher than that before the earthquake; the average rate of health behavior was 82.96, 19.71% higher than that before the earthquake; the channel to learn health knowledge and their ranks differed greatly compared with the period before the earthquake. Conclusion The health education strategies were effective during the earthquake disaster relief in Chengdu. Integrated application of various measures is essential for health education in emergency.
Objective To summary the development of health education strategies and evaluate their effects after the ‘May 12 earthquake’. Methods In May 2009, 600 people selected by random sampling in quake-hit areas received questionnaire survey on the awareness of health knowledge, the health behaviors and the channel to learn health knowledge. The findings were compared with those of pre-quake period. Results The average rate of awareness of health knowledge was 89.80%, 20.92% higher than that before the earthquake; the average rate of health behavior was 82.96, 19.71% higher than that before the earthquake; the channel to learn health knowledge and their ranks differed greatly compared with the period before the earthquake. Conclusion The health education strategies were effective during the earthquake disaster relief in Chengdu. Integrated application of various measures is essential for health education in emergency.
引文
[1]曹广文.灾后防疫非朝夕之功,科学防疫是重中之重[J].第二军医大学学报,2008,29(7):720-724.
[2]戚中田.地震灾后常见的病原体与疫病防控[J].第二军医大学学报,2008,29(6):590-593.
[3]朱建平,郭俊香,张新卫,等.SARS防制应急健康教育传播材料制作实践[J].中国预防医学杂志,2004,5(6):505-507.
[4]郭-.我国重大疾病预防控制核心信息健康传播特性探讨[J].中国健康教育,2008,24(5):395-396.
[5]周时锋,尚美斯,孙建飞,等.大众传媒在开展健康教育工作中的重要作用[J].中国初级卫生保健,2008,22(7):47-48.
[6]李英华,钱玲,马昱,等.四川省绵阳市地震灾区居民临时安置点卫生状况及灾区居民健康教育需求调查[J].中国健康教育,2008,24(11):813-816,832.
[7]全国爱国卫生运动委员会办公室.国家卫生城市标准指导手册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:18.
[8]埘鹏,孙建平,顺萍,等.健康传播方式对居民营养知行的影响[J].中国健康教育,2007,23(11):834-835,864.
[2]戚中田.地震灾后常见的病原体与疫病防控[J].第二军医大学学报,2008,29(6):590-593.
[3]朱建平,郭俊香,张新卫,等.SARS防制应急健康教育传播材料制作实践[J].中国预防医学杂志,2004,5(6):505-507.
[4]郭-.我国重大疾病预防控制核心信息健康传播特性探讨[J].中国健康教育,2008,24(5):395-396.
[5]周时锋,尚美斯,孙建飞,等.大众传媒在开展健康教育工作中的重要作用[J].中国初级卫生保健,2008,22(7):47-48.
[6]李英华,钱玲,马昱,等.四川省绵阳市地震灾区居民临时安置点卫生状况及灾区居民健康教育需求调查[J].中国健康教育,2008,24(11):813-816,832.
[7]全国爱国卫生运动委员会办公室.国家卫生城市标准指导手册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:18.
[8]埘鹏,孙建平,顺萍,等.健康传播方式对居民营养知行的影响[J].中国健康教育,2007,23(11):834-835,864.
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心