汶川地震后基层医务人员应对方式和心理健康状况的相关研究
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
目的探讨地震后基层医务人员应对方式、心理健康状况及相关因素。方法对随机抽样的122例三台县基层医务人员分别采用一般情况调查表、团体用心理社会应激调查表(PSSG)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、自评抑郁量表(SDS)进行测量。结果(1)三台县基层医务人员积极情绪体验、消极情绪体验、积极应对和应激总分均大于常模(P<0.05);而消极应对方式总分则小于常模(P<0.05);(2)消极应对与应激总分(r=0.29,P<0.05)、生活事件(r=0.29,P<0.05)、文化程度成正相关(r=0.08,P<0.05),与年龄成负相关(r=-0.21,P<0.05);(3)三台县基层医务人员,抑郁与焦虑标准分远远大于常模组(P<0.05);(4)SDS标准分与应激总分呈正相关(r=0.21,P<0.05);SAS标准分与应激总分(r=0.38,P<0.05)、积极应对成呈正相关(r=0.43,P<0.05)。结论三台县基层医务人员心理状况与常模的健康人群比较,抑郁、焦虑情绪更加明显,多采用积极应对;消极应对受应激总分、生活事件、文化程度及年龄影响;SDS标准分与应激总分有关,SAS标准分与应激总分及积极应对有关。
Objective To investigate the coping styles,status of mental and the correlationship factors among the medical staff in the basic level.Methods 122 basic medical staff in the Santan County were investigated by questionnaires,including Questionnaires of General Status,Psychosocial Stress for Groups(PSSG),Self-Rating Anxiety Scale(SAS),and Self-Rating Depression scales(SDS).Results(1)The scores of positive emotion,negative emotion,positive coping and the total score of stress in basic medical staff in Santan were more than the norm(P<0.05),but the scores of negative coping were lower than the norm(P<0.05);(2)The negative coping were in a remarkably positive correlation with the total stress(r=0.29,P<0.05),the life-events(r=0.29,P<0.05)and the education(r=0.08,P<0.05),and in a negative correlation with the age(r=-0.21,P<0.05);(3)The scores of anxiety and depression were also higher than that of the norm(P<0.05);and(4)The SDS scores were in a in remarkably positive correlation with the total stress-related(r=0.21,P<0.05),the SAS scores were in remarkably positive correlation with the total stress-related(r=0.38,P<0.05),and the positive coping(r=0.43,P<0.05).Conclusions The mental health status of basic medical staff in the Santan County were much more worse than the norm of the healthy people,the depression and anxiety of the medical staff were even more apparent,but most of them used more positive coping.Negative coping was influenced by the total stress-related,life-events,educational level and age.The SDS scores was influenced by the total stress-related,and the SAS scores was influenced by the total stress-related and the positive coping.
引文
[1]CarrVJ,Lewin TJ,Webster R A,et al.Psychosocial sequel-ae of the1989castle Earthquake:II.Exposure and morbidity profiles during the first2years post-disaster[J].Psycho-logical Medicine,1997,27(1):167-178.
    [2]Norris F H,Friedman MJ,Watson PJ,et al.60000Disaster victims speak:Part1.An empirical reviewof the empirical lit-erature,1981-2001[J].Psychiatry,2002,65(3):207-239.
    [3]汪向东,赵承智,新福尚隆,等.地震后创伤性应激障碍的发生率及影响因素[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1999,13(1):28-30.
    [4]Folkman S,Lazarus RS,Dunkel-Schetter C,et al.Dynamics of a stressful encounter:cognitive appraisal,coping and en-counter outcomes[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psy-chology,1986,50(5):992-1003.
    [5]姜乾金.心理社会应激因素的综合评估初探[J].中国行为医学科学,1998,7(3):182-184.
    [6]沈峥嵘,陈龙.应对方式对医务人员心理健康的影响[J].工业卫生与职业病,2005,31(3):143-145.
    [7]马煊,成龙.应对方式、人格特征与应激水平的关系[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2004,12(1):48-49.
    [8]王丽杰,徐承金,严进,等.357名军队医务人员心理防御方式和应对方式调查分析[J].解放军预防医学杂志,2008,6(26):202-203.
    [9]钟霞,姜乾金,吴志霞,等.生活事件社会支持压力反应对医务人员应对方式的影响[J].中国行为医学科学,2004,13(5):560-562.
    [10]任凯,彭龙颜,邢济春,等.什邡地震灾区984名灾民心理健康调查[J].中国公共卫生管理,2008,24(3):243-245.
    [11]马晓丹.乡镇卫生院医护人员职业应激与压力及其影响因素的研究.中国优秀博硕士学位论文全文数据库(硕士),2006.
    [12]钟霞,姜乾金,吴志霞,等.医务人员压力反应与社会支持生活时间应对方式的相关研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(1):70-72.
    [13]Navia Carmen Elvira,Ossa Marcela.Family functioning,cop-ing,and psychological adjust ment in victims and their families following kidnapping[J].J Journal of traumatic stress,2003,16(1):107-110.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心