两类地震风险评估模型的对比与讨论

英文篇名：COMPARISON OF TWO MODELS FOR SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT
中文刊名：北京师范大学学报(自然科学版)
英文刊名：Journal of Beijing Normal University(Natural Science)
作者：杨文涛 ; 汪明 ; 史培军
英文作者：YANG Wentao1 ; 2 ; 3) WANG Ming1 ; 2) SHI Peijun1 ; 2)(1)State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology ; Beijing Normal University ; 100875 ; Beijing ; China ; 2) Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management ; Ministry of Civil Affairs & Ministry of Education ; Beijing Normal University ; 100875 ; Beijing ; China ; 3) College of Earth and Environmental Sciences ; Lanzhou University ; 730000 ; Lanzhou ; China)
中文关键词：地震风险模型 ; 概率分析方法 ; 离散事件仿真
英文关键词：seismic risk analysis ; probability based ; discrete event-based simulation
出版日期：2011-10-15
机构：北京师范大学地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室;民政部-教育部减灾与应急管理研究院;兰州大学资源环境学院;
年：2011
期：05
出版单位：北京师范大学学报(自然科学版)

摘要

回顾了传统的地震危险性评估的方法,介绍了基于离散事件仿真的地震风险评估方法,并以云南省永胜县为例,运用2类不同的方法对永胜县面临的地震风险进行了计算,得到了永胜县的地震烈度超越概率曲线.结果显示2类不同评估方法的结果有着很高的吻合度;结合保险行业地震风险管理的实际需求进一步讨论了基于离散事件的地震模型的优点及其合理性.
This paper reviewed traditional method of seismic risk analysis,then introduced a discrete event-based simulation method.Yongsheng County in Yunnan Province was chosen as a case for study.These two methods were tested by calculating seismic hazard risks in Yongsheng and a comparison was made of the results in the form of exceeding probability(EP) curves.Data showed that these two methods generated relatively consistent EP curves.The paper considered the practical needs of insurance industry,then discussed advantages and rationality of event-based simulation method.

引文

[1]Patricia G,Paul K,Howard K.The impact ofuncertainty in managing seismic risk:the case study ofearthquake frequency and structural vulnerability[EB/OL].[2010-12-25].http:∥fic.wharton.upenn.edu/fic/papers/99/9923.pdf
    [2]Jens U K.Seismic hazard analysis-quo vadis?[J].Earth-Science Review,2008(88):1
    [3]Senior Seismic Hazard Analysis Committee(SSHAC).Recommendations for probabilistic seismic hazardanalysis:guidance on uncertainty and use of experts[R].Washington:US Nuclear Regulatory Commission,1997
    [4]Allin Cornell C.Engineering seismic risk analysis[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,1968,58(5):1583
    [5]Edward H F,Thomas H J.OpenSHA:a developingcommunity-modeling environment for seismic-hazardanalysis[J].Seism Res Lett,2003,74:406
    [6]胡聿贤.地震安全性评价技术教程[M].北京:地震出版社,1999
    [7]王瑛,王阳.城乡承载体差异对地震灾情的影响:以包头地震和姚安地震为例[J].灾害学,2009,24(1):122
    [8]王瑛,史培军,王敬爱.云南省农村乡镇地震灾害房屋损失评估[J].地震学报,2005,27(5):551
    [9]虢顺民,向宏发,张靖,等.1515年云南永胜县地震形变带和震级讨论[J].地震研究,1988,11(2):153
    [10]周庆,虢顺民,向宏发.滇西北地区潜在震源区的划分原则和方法[J].地震地质,2004,26(4):761
    [11]汪素云,俞言祥,高阿甲,等.中国分区地震衰减关系的确定[J].中国地震,2000,16(2):99