地震灾区居民健康素养干预效果评估
|
摘要
目的调查2008年"5.12"汶川大地震后,汶川、北川、绵竹3个极重灾区群众健康素养状况在开展行为干预活动2年后的效果,对干预活动进行评估。方法采用问卷调查方法,于干预活动开展的前后分别调查了360名居民的健康相关知识、健康相关行为等内容。结果灾区居民健康素养基本知识知晓率于干预前后分别为57.1%和83.2%;健康行为形成率于干预前后分别为41.2%和68.5%。知晓率和形成率的提高均有统计学意义(χ2=46.1,P<0.01;χ2=29.3,P<0.01)。结论经过2年的行为干预活动,地震极重灾区的健康教育工作已取得一定成绩,但仍需不断深入开展有针对性地开展健康素养的宣传和普及。
Objective To investigate the effect of the health literacy intervention in earth quake area including of Wenchuan,Beichuan,Mianzhu after 2 years' implemention,and evaluate the intervention activity.Methods Questionaire survey was used to investigate the health related knowledge and behaviors among 360 residents before and after intervention activities for two years respectively.Results The awareness rate of health knowledge increased from 57.1% to 83.2%,and the formation rate of health behaviors increased from 41.2% to 68.5%,with the differences statistically significant(χ2=46.1,P<0.01;χ2=29.3,P<0.01).Conclusion After two years of behavioral interventions,the health educationn in most earthquake-hit areas has made some achievements,but further targeted promotion and popularization of health literacy are still needed.
Objective To investigate the effect of the health literacy intervention in earth quake area including of Wenchuan,Beichuan,Mianzhu after 2 years' implemention,and evaluate the intervention activity.Methods Questionaire survey was used to investigate the health related knowledge and behaviors among 360 residents before and after intervention activities for two years respectively.Results The awareness rate of health knowledge increased from 57.1% to 83.2%,and the formation rate of health behaviors increased from 41.2% to 68.5%,with the differences statistically significant(χ2=46.1,P<0.01;χ2=29.3,P<0.01).Conclusion After two years of behavioral interventions,the health educationn in most earthquake-hit areas has made some achievements,but further targeted promotion and popularization of health literacy are still needed.
引文
[1]沃林斯基著.孙牧虹,等译.健康社会学[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,1993:151-159.
[2]中华人民共和国卫生部.健康66条-中国公民健康素养读本[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:3-5.
[3]Winkleby MA,Jatulis DE,Frank E.Socioeconomic status and health:bow education,income,and occupation contribute to risk factors forcardiovascular disease[J].American Journal of Public Health,1992,82(6):816-820.
[4]Ross CE,Wu C.The links between education and health[J].Ameri-can Sociological Review,1995,60:719-745.
[5]Lynn Nielsen Bohlman.A1lison M.Panzer.Health literacy:a prescrip-tion to end confusion[M].Washington DC:T'he National Academiespress,2004:21-58.
[6]张春娟,卢愿清,赵海燕.农村改厕障碍因素的文化分析[J].中国公共卫生管理,2008,24(1):22-23.
[7]曹德全,张荣.农村改水改厕干预措施控制腹泻病效果的调查[J].中国农村卫生事业管理,2007,27(6):466-467.
[8]Parker RM,Ratzan SC,Lurie N.Health literacy:a policy challenge foradvancing high-quality health re[J].Health-Aff-(Millwood),2003,22(4):147-153.
[9]马晓.健康教育学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:130.
[2]中华人民共和国卫生部.健康66条-中国公民健康素养读本[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:3-5.
[3]Winkleby MA,Jatulis DE,Frank E.Socioeconomic status and health:bow education,income,and occupation contribute to risk factors forcardiovascular disease[J].American Journal of Public Health,1992,82(6):816-820.
[4]Ross CE,Wu C.The links between education and health[J].Ameri-can Sociological Review,1995,60:719-745.
[5]Lynn Nielsen Bohlman.A1lison M.Panzer.Health literacy:a prescrip-tion to end confusion[M].Washington DC:T'he National Academiespress,2004:21-58.
[6]张春娟,卢愿清,赵海燕.农村改厕障碍因素的文化分析[J].中国公共卫生管理,2008,24(1):22-23.
[7]曹德全,张荣.农村改水改厕干预措施控制腹泻病效果的调查[J].中国农村卫生事业管理,2007,27(6):466-467.
[8]Parker RM,Ratzan SC,Lurie N.Health literacy:a policy challenge foradvancing high-quality health re[J].Health-Aff-(Millwood),2003,22(4):147-153.
[9]马晓.健康教育学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:130.
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心