地震后灾区中学生创伤后应激障碍变化趋势及相关因素分析
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
目的探讨"5.12"汶川地震后灾区中学生创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)阳性率的变化趋势及其影响因素,为灾区青少年心理干预策略和措施提供科学依据。方法采用方便抽样方法,选取"5.12"汶川地震灾区3所中学1 966名中学生,使用创伤后应激障碍症状清单平民版(PCL-C)和领悟社会支持量表(PSSS)进行3次自填式问卷随访调查。结果中学生PTSD筛查阳性率和严重程度变化(2χ=65.440,48.368,P值均<0.01)均呈下降趋势。多元Logistic回归分析显示,女性(OR=1.46)、居住地为农村(OR=1.28)、本人受伤(OR=2.46)、房屋财产损失(OR=1.67)是PTSD发生的危险因素;汉族(OR=0.66)、灾后时间越久(OR=0.73)、领悟社会支持越高(OR=0.97)是PTSD的保护因素。结论随着时间推移,灾区中学生的PTSD阳性率逐渐降低。应加强灾区学生尤其是PTSD高危人群和阳性人群的关注,增加其各方面社会支持。
Objective To explore the trajectory and related factors of post-traumatic stress disorder(PTSD) for secondary school students in Wenchuan after 5.12 earthquake.Methods A total of 1 966 students from three secondary schools of Wenchuan was evaluated by PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version(PCL-C) and Perceived Social Support Scale(PSSS) in 4,7,10 months after 5.12 earthquake,respectively.Results In the three surveys,the incidence rate(χ2=65.440,P<0.001) and severity(χ2=48.368,P<0.01) of PTSD were both showed a decreasing tendency.Logistic regression analysis showed that female(OR=1.46),come from rural(OR=1.28),be injured(OR =2.46),housing property damage(OR=1.67) were the risk factors of PTSD;Han nationality(OR=0.66),longer time interval(OR=0.73),higher perceived social support(OR=0.97) were protective factors for PTSD.Conclusion The positive rate of PTSD among secondary school students over time gradually decreased.Local government should pay more attention to the high-risk students and those with PTSD positive symptoms.
引文
[1]JORDANNN,HOGE CW,TOBLER SK,et al.Mental Health impact of9/11 Pentagon attack:Validation of a rapid assessment tool.Am J PrevMed,2004,26(4):284-293.
    [2]姜乾金.领悟社会支持量表.中国行为医学科学,2001,10(10):41-43.
    [3]American Psychiatric Association(1994).Diagnostic and statisticalmanual of mental disorders.IV Edition,Washington:APA,1994:427-429.
    [4]RODRIGUEZ N,STEINBERG AS,SALTZMAN WS,et al.PTSD in-dex:Psychometric analyses of the adolescent version.Symposium con-ducted at the Annual Meeting of the International Society for TraumaticStress Studies.LA:New Orleans,2001:6-9.
    [5]侯彩兰,李凌江,张燕,等.矿难后2个月和10个月创伤后应激障碍的发生率及相关因素.中南大学学报:医学版,2008,33(4):279-283.
    [6]JOHN PB,RUSSELL S,RUSSELL PS.The prevalence of posttrau-matic stress disorder among children and adolescents affected by tsuna-mi disaster in Tamil Nadu.J Disaster Manage Resp,2007,5(1):3-7.
    [7]王相兰,陶炯,温盛霖,等.汶川地震灾民的心理健康状况及影响因素.中山大学学报:医学科学版,2008,29(4):367-371.
    [8]赵高锋,杨彦春,张强,等.汶川地震极重灾区社区居民创伤后应激障碍发生率及影响因素.中国心理卫生杂志,2009,23(7):145-147.
    [9]LAMBERG L.Psychiatrists explore legacy of traumatic stress in earlylife.JAMA,2001,286(5):523-526.
    [10]KUO HW,WUSJ,MATC,et al.Posttraumatic symptoms were worstamong quake victims with injuries following the Chi-Chi quake in Tai-wan.J Psychosom Res,2007,62(4):495-500.
    [11]刘贵浩,郭丽.地震后儿童创伤后应激障碍的症状及其治疗.中山大学学报:医学科学版,2008,29(6):649-653.
    [12]ZOHAR J,JUVEN WA,MYERS V,et al.Posttraumatic stress disor-der:Facts and fiction.Curr Opin Psychiatry,2008,21(1):74-77.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心