欧亚地震带现代构造应力场及其分区特征
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
利用美国哈佛大学矩心矩张量目录中的2818个地震的震源机制解资料,分析了欧亚地震带及其5个分区现代构造应力场的基本特征,给出了5个分区的震源机制主压应力方向分布图。结果表明:①欧亚地震带以逆断型和走滑型断层活动为主;②地中海地震区以走滑断层活动为主,主压应力方向为SSW向;③伊朗—阿富汗—巴基斯坦地震区以逆断型断层活动为主,主压应力优势方向为NNE—NS向;④喜马拉雅地震以逆断型为主,主压应力优势方向为NS和NE向;⑤川—滇—缅地震区以走滑断层活动为主,主应力场方向为NNE向;⑥印度尼西亚地震区以逆断型断层活动为主,主压应力优势方向为NE—SSW向。各分区的主压应力方向明显受其所在区域板块运动的影响,由此推测板块运动可能是产生欧亚地震带构造应力的主要力源。
According to the focal mechanism solutions of 2 818 earthquakes from the Harvard CMT catalogue, we analyze the basic characteristics of the tectonic stress fields in the Eurasian earthquake zone and its five subareas, and compile the tectonic stress maps for the five subareas. The results indicate: (1) most earthquakes in the Eurasian zone have thrust faulting and strike-slip faulting mechanisms;(2) in the Mediterranean area, the focal mechanisms are mainly strike-slip faulting,the principal compressive stress are mostly in SSW direction;(3) in the Iran-Afghanistan-Pakistan area, the focal mechanisms are mainly thrust faulting,the principal compressive stress are usually in NNE-NS direction;(4) in the Himalaya region, the focal mechanisms are also thrust faulting, the principal compressive stress are mostly in NE and NS directions;(5) in the Sichuan-Yunnan-Burma area, the focal mechanisms are mainly strike-slip faulting, the principal compressive stress are mostly in NNE direction;(6) in Indonesia, the focal mechanisms are mainly thrust faulting, the principal compressive stress are mostly in NE-SSW direction. Because the orientations of the principal compressive stresses are obvious effected by the plate movement, it is inferred that the plate movement may be the primary force source of the tectonic stress field in the Eurasian zone.
引文
[1]苏有锦,李忠华,蔡民军,等.1997.云南区域构造地球动力学与地震活动性研究.
    程万正,刁桂苓,吕弋培,等.2003.川滇地块的震源力学机制、运动速率和活动方式[J].地震地质,25(1):71-87.
    崔效锋,谢富仁.1999.利用震源机制解对中国西南及邻区进行应力分区的初步研究[J].地震学报,21(5):513-522.
    邓起东,张裕明,许桂林,等.1979.中国构造应力场特征及其与板块构造运动的关系[J].地震地质,1(1):17-21.
    杜兴信,邵辉成.1999.由震源机制解反演中国大陆现代构造应力场[J].地震学报,21(4):492-501.
    高国英,戈澍谟.1997.帕米尔地区地震活动性和震源机制的分布特征[J].内陆地震,11(4):302-308.
    戈澎谟.1983.中亚地区大陆碰撞的影响和作用力[J].科学通报,28(7):423-425.
    金双根,朱耀文.2003.GPS监测全球板块构造运动的研究[D].博士研究生论文.上海:中国科学院上海天文台.
    阚荣举.1977.我国西南地区现代构造应力场与现代构造活动特征的探讨[J].地球物理学报,20(2):96-107.
    李鸿吉,秦建业.1994.缅甸弧及其周围地区的震源机制和现代应力场[J].地震学报,16(4):463-469.
    马宗晋,杜品仁,洪汉净.2003.地球构造与动力学[M].广州:广东科技出版社:223-269.
    孙建中,杨少敏.2005.用GPS资料揭示现今中国大陆构造运动[J].大地测量与地球动力学,25(3):75-80.
    王辉,张国民,马宏生,等.2005.利用哈佛CMT目录研究全球I级构造系统的地震活动[J].地震地质,27(1):44-54.
    魏柏林.1994.震原机制变化的机理———转换应力场[M].北京:地震出版社:83-109.
    谢富仁,崔效锋,赵建涛.2003.全球应力场与构造分析[J].地学前缘,23(10):22-30.
    徐杰,高祥林.2005.2004年12月26日印度尼西亚8.7级大震构造背景的初步分析[J].地震地质,27(2):324-331.
    许忠淮.2001.东亚地区现今构造应力图的编制[J].地震学报,23(5):492-501.
    章杰,臧绍先.1986.中、滇、印地区的地震分布特征及震源机制解的研究[J].地震学报,8(3):240-300.
    Helffrich G R.1997.Howgood are routinely determined focal mechanisms?Empirical statistics based on a comparison of Harvard,USGS and ERImoment tensors[J].Geophys Jour Int,(131):741-750.
    Turcotte D L,Schubert G.2002.Geody namics[M].Second edition.Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press,339-368.
    Zhang Yuming.Wang Liang mou,Dong Ruishu.1984.The seismicityand plate tectonics in Eurasia[J].Journal of Seismological Re-search.7(2):239-252.
    Zoback ML.1992.First-and second-order patterns of stress in the litho-sphere:The world stress map project[J].Geophysics Research,97(138):11703-11728.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心